The Indian School of Decolonisation: The subaltern in the Greater Mekong Subregion from 1992 to 2022

Main Article Content

Thanachate Wisaijorn

Abstract

This article examines how international cooperation among the riverine nation-states of the Mekong primarily benefits political elites while marginalising the voices of subaltern groups. The study focuses on China, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam, where a colonial legacy of spatial and temporal interpretation—favoured by elites—remains predominant. Despite some states, such as People’s Republic of China and Thailand, claiming to have avoided formal colonisation, they nonetheless adopted Western forms of government. Using the theoretical framework of the Indian School of Decolonisation, which emerged during India’s struggle for independence and emphasises non-Western knowledge systems, this article highlights the importance of amplifying subaltern voices. Currently, scholarship and international politics in the Mekong Subregion are dominated by Western perspectives, leaving the local, non-elite peoples underrepresented. This study employs discourse analysis to examine fourteen international frameworks and regional initiatives established between 1992 and 2022 in the Mekong Subregion. The findings reveal that these initiatives and frameworks, shaped by elite and Western-centric interpretations of space, time, and peoples’ status, largely benefit the political elites, while the subaltern peoples remain marginalised and their concerns unaddressed. This article calls for greater recognition of the subalterns in the Mekong Subregion, advocating for their inclusion in international mechanisms and the promotion of their voices in regional initiatives.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wisaijorn, T. (2025). The Indian School of Decolonisation: The subaltern in the Greater Mekong Subregion from 1992 to 2022. ASIA PARIDARSANA, 45(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14456/ajar.2024.1
Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)
Share |

References

ภาษาอังกฤษ

Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined community: Reflection on the origin and spread of nationalism. London & New York: Verso.

Asian Development Bank. 2021. The Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program strategic framework 2030. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Charoensri, Narut. 2022. “Changing regional dynamics in the Greater Mekong Subregion: The rivalry between Japan China and the US and the impacts to regional connectivity.” Thammasat Review 25 (2): 26-45. Accessed 30 January 2024. https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tureview/article/view/240244/163816

Chatterjee, Partha. 1993. Nationalist thought and a colonial world: A derivative discourse. London: Zen Books Ltd.

Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chattranond, Ome. 2018. “Battery of Asia?: The Rise of Regulatory Regionalism and Transboundary Hydropower Development in Laos” PhD diss., University of Erasmus.

Guha, Ranajit. 1988. “On some aspects of the historiography of Colonial India.” In Selected Subaltern Studies, edited by Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, 37-44. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Diener, Alexander, and Hagen, Joshua. 2012. Borders: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hutchings, Kimberley. 2008. Times and world politics: Thinking the present. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Ivarsson, Søren. 2008. Creating Laos: The making of Lao Space between Indochina and Siam, 1860-1945. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

“Mekong Australia Partnership: Key Result for the Period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022”. 2022. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government, accessed 2 April 2024. https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/southeast-asia/investing-our-southeast-asian-partnerships/mekong-australia-partnership

Ngaosyvathn, Mayoury, and Ngaosyvathn, Pheuiphanh. 1994. Kith and kin politics: The relationship between Laos and Thailand. Manila: Journal of Contemporary Asia Publishers.

Ó Tuathail, Géaroid. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. London: Routledge.

Poonkham, Jittipat. 2022. Power politics and the instutional architecture in the Mekong Subregion: Beyond the geopolitical trap? Journal. International Studies Center, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accessed 2 April 2024. https://isc.mfa.go.th/en/content/power-politics-mekong?cate=5f204a5928600c531517cb75

Ruggie, John, G. 1998. Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalization. London and New York: Routledge.

Said, Edward. 1977. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.

Sankhamanee, Jakkrit. 2012. “Decolonising the river: Transnationalism and the flows of knowledge on Mekong ecology.” In Managing transnational flows in East Asia, edited by Shirlena Huang, Mike Hayes and Sang Kook Lee, 173-186. Seoul: Jimoondang.

Spivak, Gayatri. 1985. “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing historiography.” In Subaltern Studies writing on South Asian history, and Society Vol. IV, edited by Ranajit Guha, 330-363. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing historiography.” In Selected Subaltern Studies, edited by Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, 3-34. Delhi: Oxford University Press

“The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Governments of Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam on the occasion of the First Mekong-U.S. Partnership Ministerial Meeting on September 11, 2020”. 2020. US Mission to ASEAN, accessed 2 April 2024. https://asean.usmission.gov/mekong-u-s-partnership-joint-ministerial-statement/

Walker, Andrew. 2008. “Borders in motion on the upper-Mekong: Siam and France in the 1890s.” New Mandala.accessed 3 September 2019. https://www.newmandala.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/Borders%20in%20motion.pdf

Winichakul, Thongchai. 1994. Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Wolters, Oliver, W. 1999. History, culture and region in Southeast Asian perspectives. New York: Cornell University Press.

ภาษาไทย

“ความร่วมมือประเทศลุ่มน้ำโขงกับเกาหลี (Mekong- ROK Cooperation).” 2555. กรมเศรษฐกิจระหว่างประเทศ, กระทรวงการต่างประเทศ, เข้าถึงเมือ 2 เมษายน 2567. https://business.mfa.go.th/th/content/25432-%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B3%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B5-(mekong-rok-cooperation)?cate=5d73a21d15e39c36a8006c2b

นรุตม์ เจริญศรี. 2553. “บทบาทของธนาคารเพื่อการพัฒนาแห่งเอเชียในโครงการพัฒนาความร่วมมือทางเศรษฐกิจในอนุภูมิภาคลุ่มแม่น้ำโขง.” วิทยานิพนธ์รัฐศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต, จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

นรุตม์ เจริญศรี. 2565. เอกสารประกอบการสอน 12633 อนุภูมิภาคลุ่มน้ำโขงศึกษา. เชียงใหม่. คณะรัฐศาสตร์และรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่.

สุรสม กฤษณะจูฑะ และปิ่นวดี ศรีสุพรรณ. 2562. “วาทกรรมและการสร้างความหมายการพัฒนาเขตพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจพิเศษมุกดาหาร.” วารสารสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร. [ออนไลน์] 15(2): 38-66. เข้าถึงเมื่อ 1 กรกฎาคม 2564. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssnu/article/view/231417