THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY SYSTEM, NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY OFFICE (NHSO), REGION 1, THAILAND

Authors

  • เกศสุดา สิทธิสันติกุล Faculty of Economics, Maejo University
  • วิรัตน์ คำศรีจันทร์ Faculty of Liberal Arts, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50290
  • บัญจรัตน์ โจลานันท์ Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50300
  • ปรารถนา ยศสุข School of Administration Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50290

Keywords:

evaluation, participation, public hearing, national health security

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate inputs, process, products and contexts, and to analyze preference level of participants under public hearing for national health security system conducted by National Health Security Office (NHSO), Region 1. Qualitative data from document analysis, participatory observation, and 58 interviewees were analyzed for evaluating inputs, process, products and contexts. Quantitative data for analyzing level of preference were also derived by questionnaires with 450 participants. The results indicated that 1) inputs – policy and strategy for development of national health security system, and act of national health security 2006, 2) process – planning, implementation and evaluation, 3) products – outputs: the results of public hearings for policy and implementation ; outcomes: stimulating sense of health care and service 4) contexts – strengths: structural management, networking ; weaknesses: participants, issues of public hearing, communication, lifting opinions to policy ; opportunities: policy, law, networking, public awareness ; threatens: national structure, financial regulations, access to local administrative organization and ethnics 5) preference level –  good level in process, participation, and issues of public hearing being.

References

Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health. (2018). National strategic plan of public health in 20 years, budget year 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from http://bps.moph.go.th. (in Thai)

Chompunth, C. (2013). Good governance and public participation in decision-making process of development project. Journal of environmental management, 9(1): 85-106. (in Thai)

Junsakul, S. (2014). The historical development of evaluation and theorists’ concepts. EAU Heritage Journal Science and Technology, 8(1): 68-79.)

Kokpon, A. (2009). Handbook of public participation for local administrator. Bangkok: Prapokklao Institute. (in Thai)

National Health Security Office. (2015). Splendid 360 angle: public hearing of national health security. Bangkok: NHSO. (in Thai)

Poomsanguan, K. & Bguanboonmark, B. (2017). Health Promotion Program Evaluation Approach. Journal of the Royal Thai Army Nurses18(3): 26-37. (in Thai)

Promjui, S. (2001). Technique of project evaluation. Nonthaburee: Sukothai Thammathirat Publication. (in Thai)

Seasara, W. (2010). Principle and difference between public opinion and public hearing under constitution. Journal of Minutes Law, 7(6): 145-155. (in Thai)

Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Uphoff, N. (1992). Local institutions and participation for sustainable development. Gatekeeper Series No. SA31 New York: International Institute for Environmental.

Yodnin, J., Wongnaya, S. & Poonpan, S. (2010). The assessment of health insurance system or local health insurance of Kamphang Pher Municipality Kamphaneng Phet Province. Research Journal of Sak Thong, 16(2): 131-146. (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

2019-08-15

How to Cite

สิทธิสันติกุล เ. ., คำศรีจันทร์ ว. ., โจลานันท์ บ. ., & ยศสุข ป. . (2019). THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY SYSTEM, NATIONAL HEALTH SECURITY OFFICE (NHSO), REGION 1, THAILAND. Academic Journal Phranakhon Rajabhat University, 11(1), 35–49. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJPU/article/view/181576

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Article)