The Consideration of the Efficiencies Arising from Mergers under the Competition Law
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The efficiencies arising from the mergers are one of the critical issues that will make enforcement competition laws meet their objectives because the efficiency resulting from mergers may cause good results to the economy. It has been used as part of considering business mergers according to the competition laws of different countries. Each country's competitive law regulatory authorities set clear criteria for determining efficiencies to consider the mergers specific and in line with the spirit of the competition laws. At the same time, the Trade Competition Act B.E.2560 (2017) has also been set to consider the mergers in Thailand. The Trade Competition Commission must also consider the efficiencies arising from mergers, but there has no criteria and details that have been set in considering such factors, in particular. Therefore, the consideration of the efficiencies will be taken only at the Trade Competition Commission's discretion. Accordingly, to consider the efficiencies resulting from the mergers properly and always in line with the competition law's spirit, the Trade Competition Commission should evidently determine the rules and details of such factors.
Article Details
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to [email protected].
4. Chulalongkorn Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to [email protected].
References
Competition & Consumer Commission Singapore. "The Substantive Assessment of Mergers." December 2016.
Elhauge, E. United States Antitrust Law and Economics. New York: Foundation Press, 2008.
Gore, D., Lewis, S., Lofaro, A., and Dethmers, F. The Economic Assessment of Mergers Under European Competition Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Hawk, B., Stoll, N. R., and Schwartz, K. United States of America. In Edited by Dabbah, M. and QC, P. L., Merger Control Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Hovenkamp, H. Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and its Practice. 5th ed. Minnesota: West Publishing, 2016.
Hovenkamp, H. Principles of Antitrust. Minnesota: West Academic Publishing, 2017.
Japan Fair Trade Commission. "Guidelines to Application of the Antimonopoly Act Concerning Review of Business Combination." 17 December 2019.
Jones, A., Sufrin, B., and Dunne, N. EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Koki Arai. Law and Economics in Japanese Competition Policy. Singapore: Springer, 2019.
Kokkoris, I., and Shelanski, H. EU Merger Control: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Lim Chong Kin, and Cavinder Bull SC. Competition Law and Policy in Singapore. 2nd ed. Singapore: Academy Publishing, 2015.
Lim Chong Kin, and Chew, C. Mergers. In Edited by Cavinder Bull SC and Lim Chong Kin, Competition Law and Policy in Singapore. Singapore: Academy Publishing, 2015.
Masako Wakui. Antimonopoly Law: Competition Law and Policy in Japan. 2nd ed. Nevada: JSPS Kakenhi, 2018.
Niels, G., Jenkins, H., and Kavanagh, J. Economics for Competition Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Renckens, A. Welfare Standards, Substantive Tests, and Efficiency Considerations in Merger Policy: Defining the Efficiency Defense. Journal of Competition Law and Economics 3, 2 (2007): 149 - 179.
Shiau, D., and Chen, E. Merger Control in Singapore: Law and Practice. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2011.
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. "Horizontal Merger Guidelines." 19 August 2010.
Whish, R., and Bailey, D. Competition Law. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
เจมส์ ฟุลเชอร์. ทุนนิยม : ความรู้ฉบับพกพา. กรุงเทพมหานคร: โอเพ่นเวิลด์ส, 2554.
นราทิพย์ ชุติวงศ์. ทฤษฎีเศรษฐศาสตร์จุลภาค. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 11. กรุงเทพมหานคร: คณะเศรษฐศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 2558.
วิไลวรรณ วรรณนิธิกุล. เศรษฐศาสตร์อุตสาหกรรมและทฤษฎีต้นทุน. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, 2538.
ศักดา ธนิตกุล. คำอธิบายและกรณีศึกษาพระราชบัญญัติการแข่งขันทางการค้า พ.ศ. 2542. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2. กรุงเทพมหานคร: วิญญูชน, 2553.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการแข่งขันทางการค้า. ผลคำวินิจฉัยกรณีการขออนุญาตรวมธุรกิจระหว่างบริษัท ซี.พี. รีเทล ดีเวลลอปเม้นท์ จำกัด และบริษัท เทสโก้ สโตร์ส (ประเทศไทย) จำกัด [ออนไลน์]. 2563. แหล่งที่มา: https://otcc.or.th/pronouncement/2020/12/18/cp-tesco-case/ [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 10 มกราคม 2564]
อัญญา ขันธวิทย์. การควบกิจการและการครอบงำกิจการ. กรุงเทพมหานคร: คณะพาณิชยศาสตร์และการบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2540.