The Trajectory of a New World Tax Order in the Digital Economy Era
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The disruptive development of digital technology (disruptive technology) has driven the world to enter a full-fledged digital economy era with digital technology at its core. The ubiquity of the digital economy will inevitably consequentially affect the economy and society in a myriad of dimensions, including within the domain of taxation. This raises the issue that the current principles of taxation in various countries, especially the collection of taxes from multinational enterprises, are outdated and unable to adequately cope with the disruptive environment within the digital economy era. Thus, over the past decade, there has been a wave of taxation reforms around the world so that tax collection in the digital economy is more aligned and appropriate. This research therefore aims to study the trend of tax reforms as a result of tax harmonisation. Looking at the changes in taxation at the national, regional, and global levels, it is found that the reform and integration trend has shifted towards a new world tax order which aims to establish global tax norms to support appropriate tax collection in the digital economy era. This research analysed the direction of such changes and contends that although the trend of tax reform and integration is moving towards a new world tax order, it has not yet developed to the unification level where there is a unified set of principles. It remains at the level of intergovernmental cooperation, in both bilateral and multilateral approach, emphasising on the use of both hard and soft laws. However, comparing to the old approach, the new world tax order focuses heavily more on employing multilateral instruments. In addition, this research presents how the shift toward a new world tax order as a result of such tax reform and integration trends has had significant implications for tax jurisdiction as well as national tax sovereignty. This creates both strengths and weaknesses that lead to problems, obstacles and opportunities that differ from country to country.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
Adrian J. Sawyer. Developing a World Tax Organisation: The Way Forward. UK: Fiscal Publications, 2009.
Allison Christians. Hard Law, Soft Law, and International Taxation. 25 (2007) Wisc. Int’l L.J.: 325.
Allison Christians. How Nations Share. Indiana Law Journal: Fall, 87(4) (2012): 1407, 1410.
Angelo G.A. Faria. Tax Coordination and Harmonisation. Parthasarathi Shome (ed). Tax Policy Handbook, Washington: IMF, 1995.
Belisa F. Liotti et al. U.N. Tax Committee Confident It Can Attain Ambitious Mandate. Tax Note International. 109, 13 (February 2023)
Carlo Garbarino. An Evolutionary Approach to Comparative Taxation: Methods and Agenda for Research. American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (2009): 677, 681 & 683-85
Chris Brown, Terry Nardin & Nicholas Rengger. International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Christine M. Chinkin. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law. 38 (1989) Int’l & Comp.L.Q.: 850.
Cristian Óliver Lucas-Mas and Raúl Fêlix Junquera-Varela. Tax Theory Applied to the Digital Economy: A Proposal for a Digital Data Tax and a Global Internet Tax Agency. Washington: World Bank Group, 2021.
David Armstrong. The Evolution of International Society. Baylis, J., Smith, S. & Owens, P. (eds). The Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
David M. Trubek, Patrick Cottrell, Mark Nance. Soft Law, Hard Law, and European Integration. Grainne De Búrca & Joanne Scott (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford: Hart, 2006.
Elly Van de Verde and Francesco Cannas. Harmful Tax Practices within the EU: Definition, Identification and Recommendations, Publication for the subcommittee on Tax Matters, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. Luxembourg: European Parliament, 2021.
European Parliament, Impact of Digitalisation on International Tax Matters: Challenges and Remedies, Study Requested by the TAX3 Committee, February 2019. [online] Available from : https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/161104/ST%20Impact%20of%20Digitalisation%20publication.pdf [8 October 2022]
Fernando Velayos, Alberto Barreix & Luiz Villela. Regional Integration and Tax Harmonisation: Issues and Recent Experiences. Vito Tanzi, Alberto Barreix & Luiz Villela, (eds). Taxation and Latin American Integration. Washington D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank, 2008.
Guglielmo Maisto ed. New Trends in the Definition of Permanent Establishment. Amsterdam: IBFD, 2019
Immanuel Kant. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay. Translated by Mary Campbell Smith. London: Allen & Unwin, 1903.
Inge Kaul. Blending External and Domestic Policy Demands - The Rise of the Intermediary State. Inge Kaul & Pedro Conceicao (eds). The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges. New York: OUP, 2006.
Jan Klabbers. The Redundancy of Soft Law. 65 (1996) Nordic J. Int’l L.: 167.
Jeroen van der Heijden. Selecting Cases and Inferential Types in Comparative Public Policy Research. Engeli, I. and Allison, C.R. (eds). Comparative Policy Studies. Research Methods Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Kal Raustiala. Form and Substance in International Agreements. 99 (2005) Am.J.Int’l L.: 581.
Leo Gross. The Peace of Westphalia. American Journal of International Law 42 (1948): 1, 20-41.
Mindy Herzfeld. The OECD Consults on a New Tax World Order. Tax Notes. (18 February 2019): 730-33.
Nana Ama Sarfo & Stephanie Soong Johnston. A New World Tax Order: The Inclusive Framework and Its Future. Tax Notes International. 104, 29 (November 2021): 976-79.
OECD. Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. [online] Available from : https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264192744-en [7 November 2022]
OECD. Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements: Tax Policy and Compliance Issues. [online] Available from : https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/hybrids_eng_final_october2012.pdf [8 November 2022]
OECD. Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g972ee-en. Article 7, 5.
Pasquale Pistone. Steering the Development of Direct Taxes towards a Fair Mix of Positive and Negative Integration. Michael Lang et al (eds) Horizontal Tax Coordination. Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012.
Sharon Katz-Pearlman. Definitely Not Boring: The U.N. Tax Committee and OECD Collide. Tax Notes International. 109, 6 (February 2023)
Simon James. Can We Harmonise Our Views on European Tax Harmonisation?. Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 54 (2000): 263, 263-269.
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Edited by Gaskin, J.C.A. Oxford World’s Classics. London: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War: A New Translation by Martin Hammond, Rhodes, P.J. (ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
UN Economic and Financial Committee (Second Committee). Promotion of Inclusive and Effective International Tax Cooperation at the United Nations. A/C.2/77/L.11/Rev.1 (16 November 2022)
United Nations. Technology and Innovation Report 2021 - Catching Technological Waves: Innovation with Equality. (UNCTAD/TIR/2020).
United States Mission to the United Nations. Explanation of Position on a Second Committee Resolution on the Promotion of Inclusive and Effective International Tax Cooperation. [online] Available from : https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-position-on-a-second-committee-resolution-on-the-promotion-of-inclusive-and-effective-international-tax-cooperation/ [5 January 2023]
