Abolition of Criminal Offenses in Case Employers Fail to Pay Money under the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 to Employees
Main Article Content
Abstract
The labor contract, fundamentally a civil law agreement, is governed by Sections 575 to 586 of the Civil and Commercial Code. This contract obligates the employee to work for the employer, who in return agrees to compensate the employee for all hours worked. Compensation may include wages or salaries, as well as overtime, holiday pay, holiday overtime, and other monetary benefits mandated by the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541, which must be paid accurately and punctually. In this article, the compensation received by the employee is referred to as “Compensation for work.” Failure by the employer to pay this remuneration appropriately or on time constitutes a breach of the labor contract. Although this is considered a civil offense, under the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541, it is also subject to criminal penalties including imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand baht, or both. Typically, employees do not seek criminal prosecution of the employer; instead, they prefer to claim their wages as per their legal rights. Even if the employer is subject to criminal penalties, employees must still pursue their claims through conventional processes, such as filing a lawsuit in labor court or submitting a request to the labor inspector – all of these are independent of the criminal proceedings. It is crucial to note that these offenses aim not primarily at imposing punishment or serving as criminal penalties. Furthermore, these practices may contravene the principles of the 2017 Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, potentially leading to an overinflation of criminal law and various adverse outcomes. Therefore, the objective of this article is to propose the abolition of criminal penalties for failing to pay remuneration properly or within the designated timeframe, and to explore alternative methods of addressing such offenses, such as non-criminal (Pinai) fines.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, “Prohibition on imprisonment for inability to fulfil a contract,” [online] Available from : https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/human-rights-scrutiny/public-sector-guidance-sheets/prohibition-imprisonment-inability-fulfil-contract [15 January 2022]
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, “Fines and penalties,” [online] Available from : https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/asic-investigations-and-enforcement/fines-and-penalties/ [30 April 2023]
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, “Penalty unit values : Table 1: Penalty unit values for breaches of Australian Government laws,” [online] Available from : https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/asic-investigations-and-enforcement/fines-and-penalties/ [28 May 2023]
Business Insolvency Helpline, “Wages not paid on time UK : What can I do if I am unable to pay my employees on time?,” [online] Available from : https://business-insolvency-helpline.co.uk/wages-not-paid-on-time/ [23 July 2022]
Casetext, “Cal. Lab. Code § 216: Section 216 - Additional penalties,” [online] Available from : https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-labor-code/division-2-employment-regulation-and-supervision/part-1-compensation/chapter-1-payment-of-wages/article-1-general-occupations/section-216-additional-penalties [2 May 2023]
Douglas Husak, การกำหนดความผิดทางอาญาเกินความจำเป็น : ขอบเขตของกฎหมายอาญา (Overcriminalization : The Limits of the Criminal Law), แปลโดย สำนักกิจการในพระดำริ พระเจ้าหลานเธอ พระองค์เจ้าพัชรกิติยาภา สำนักงานปลัดกระทรวงยุติธรรม กระทรวงยุติธรรม (กรุงเทพมหานคร: กระทรวงยุติธรรม, 2560)
Federal Ministry of Justice, “German Civil Code,” [online] Available from : https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/ [30 January 2022]
Federal Register of Legislation, “Fair Work Act 2009,” [online] Available from : https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2009A00028/2021-09-11/text [30 April 2023]
GORG YOUR BUSINESS LAW FIRM, “€ 40 Penalty for Late Payment of Wages and Salaries by Employers,” [online] Available from : https://www.goerg.de/en/insights/publications/21-03-2017/eu-40-penalty-for-late-payment-of-wages-and-salaries-by-employers [30 January 2022]
HALL PAYNE LAWYERS, “Underpayment of wages : What are the penalties for breaching the award and/or an employment contract?,” [online] Available from : https://www.hallpayne.com.au/blog/2020/march/wages-underpayment/ [30 April 2023]
International Labour Organization, “C095 - Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95),” [online] Available from : https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312240 [23 December 2021]
Legislation.gov.uk, “Employment Rights Act 1996,” [online] Available from : https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/27 [20 July 2022]
Office of the Law Revision Counsel, “The Fair Labor Standards Act,” [online] Available from : https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter8&edition=prelim [15 July 2022]
SHOUSE LABOR LAW GROUP, “California Pay Dates – How Frequently Must Wages Be Paid?,” [online] Available from : https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/labor/pay-periods/#4.1 [2 May 2023]
WORK LAWYERS SERVING CALIFORNIA, “The Law on Late & Unpaid Wage in California,” [online] Available from : https://www.worklawyers.com/late-unpaid-wages-california-law/ [2 May 2023]
WORK LAWYERS SERVING CALIFORNIA, “The Law on Late & Unpaid Wage in California : Chapter 7 Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) Claims,” [online] Available from : https://www.worklawyers.com/late-unpaid-wages-california-law/ [2 May 2023]
กรมสวัสดิการและคุ้มครองแรงงาน กระทรวงแรงงาน (ข้อมูลจากระบบรายงานผลการปฏิบัติงาน (Web Application) ของกรมสวัสดิการและคุ้มครองแรงงาน ข้อมูล ณ วันที่ 16 มกราคม 2564)
ปราโมทย์ เสริมศีลธรรม, หลักเกณฑ์ในการกำหนดโทษทางอาญา ภายใต้โครงการสนับสนุนสารสนเทศเพื่อการทำงานของสมาชิกรัฐสภา, (กรุงเทพมหานคร: สถาบันพระปกเกล้า, 2564)
มาตรา 124 พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองแรงงาน พุทธศักราช 2541
มาตรา 144 พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองแรงงาน พุทธศักราช 2541
มาตรา 2 พระราชบัญญัติว่าด้วยการปรับเป็นพินัย พุทธศักราช 2565
มาตรา 32 พระราชบัญญัติแรงงาน พุทธศักราช 2499
มาตรา 39 พระราชบัญญัติว่าด้วยการปรับเป็นพินัย พุทธศักราช 2565
มาตรา 5 พระราชบัญญัติว่าด้วยการปรับเป็นพินัย พุทธศักราช 2565
มาตรา 575 ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์
มาตรา 70 พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองแรงงาน พุทธศักราช 2541
รายงานการประชุมสภาผู้แทนราษฎร ชุดที่ 1 ครั้งที่ 16 สมัยประชุมสามัญ (วันที่ 13 กันยายน 2499)
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการกฤษฎีกา, แนวความคิดและทฤษฎีเกี่ยวกับกฎหมายอาญา, (เอกสารประกอบการสัมมนาเรื่องหลักเกณฑ์การกำหนดโทษทางอาญาในการตรากฎหมาย ณ โรงแรม เดอะเบอร์เคลีย์ ประตูน้ำ, 13 กันยายน 2560)
หยุด แสงอุทัย, “พระราชบัญญัติแรงงาน พ.ศ. 2499”, รัฐสภาสาร, 5, 13 (มีนาคม 2500): 9.