Legal Challenges in the Concurrent Application of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law to the Conflict in the Southern Border of Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The conflict in the Southern Border Provinces (SBPs) of Thailand has been classified as a Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC) under International Humanitarian Law (IHL). This article reappraises the conflict classification based on situational developments, against the requisite criteria of intensity and organization. The ramifications of the concurrent application of IHL and IHRL to the conflict will then be discussed. It argues that the application of both regimes to this context poses a number of legal challenges to affected persons, i.e., the enjoyment of the right to life, the right to liberty and the right to an effective remedy. Not only does it unnecessarily compromise the protection afforded by IHRL, it adversely affects the conflict as well.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
หนังสือภาษาไทย
ดอน ปาทาน และสุภลักษณ์ กาญจนขุนดี. สันติภาพในเปลวเพลิง. เนชั่นบุ๊คส์, 2004.
หนังสือภาษาต่างประเทศ
Duncan McCargo. Tearing Apart the Land: Islam and Legitimacy in Southern Thailand. Cornell University Press, 2008.
Els Debuf. Captured in War: Lawful Internment in Armed Conflict. Editions Pedone/Hart, 2013.
G.Gaggioli. L’influence mutuelle entre les droits de l’homme et le droit international humanitaire à la lumière du droit à la vie. Editions A. Pedone, 2013.
J-M Henckaerts and L Doswald-Beck. Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Joseph Chinyong Liow and Don Pathan. Confronting Ghosts Thailand’s Shapeless Southern Insurgency. Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2010.
Lawrence Hill-Cawthorne. International Law and the Procedural Regulation of Internment in Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford University, 2014.
Marco Sassòli. International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2019.
Sandesh Sivakumaran. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Tilman Rodenhäuser. Organizing Rebellion: Non-State Armed Groups under International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law, and International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Zachary Abuza. Conspiracy of Silence the Insurgency in Southern Thailand. United States Institutes of Peace Press, 2009.
บทความภาษาต่างประเทศ
Amichai Cohen and Yuval Shany. Beyond the Grave Breaches Regime: The Duty to Investigate Alleged Violations of International Law Governing Armed Conflicts. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, (January 2012). 37-84.
Amy M. L. Tan. The Duty to Investigate Alleged Violations of International Humanitarian Law: Outdated Deference to an Intentional Accountability Problem. International Law and Politics, 49, 181, (2016). 223-238.
Benjamin Zawacki. Politically Inconvenient, Legally Correct: A Non-International Armed Conflict in Southern Thailand. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 18, 1 (April 2013). 151-179.
D. Murray. Relationship between international human rights law and the law of armed conflict. Practitioners’ Guide to Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict, eds D. Akande, C. Garraway, F. Hampson, N. Lubell, and E. Wilmshurst. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Droege Cordula. Elective Affinities? Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross, 90 (2008). 501-548.
Duncan McCargo. Thaksin and the Resurgence of Violence in the Thai South: Network Monarchy Strikes Back?. Critical Asian Studies, 38, 1 (2006). 39-71.
Françoise J. Hampson. The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law from the Perspective of a Human Rights Treaty Body. International Review of the Red Cross, 90, 871 (September 2008). 549-572.
Gabor Rona. Is There a Way Out of the Non-International Armed Conflict Detention Dilemma?. International Law Studies, 91 (2015). 32-59.
Gabriella Venturini. IHL Obligations that Survive an Armed Conflict: the Legal Framework. Respecting International Humanitarian Law: Challenges and Responses, eds. Michel Veuthey and Gian Beruto. International Institute of Humanitarian Law, 2013.
Geoffrey S. Corn. Mixing Apples and Hand Grenades: The Logical Limit of Applying Human Rights Norms to Armed Conflict. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, (November 2009). 1-51.
Gloria G. Gaggioli and Robert Kolb. A Right to Life in Armed Conflicts? : the Contribution of the European Court of Human Rights. Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 37 (2007). 115-163.
Gloria Gaggioli and Pavle Kilibarda. Counterterrorism and the Risk of over-Classification of Situations of Violence. International Review of the Red Cross, 103, 916-917 (2021). 203-236.
Hunjoon Kim and Kathryn Sikkink. Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries. International Studies Quarterly, 54 (2010). 939–963.
J Cerone. Jurisdiction and Power: The Intersection of Human Rights Law & The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict in an Extraterritorial Context. Israel Law Review, 40 (2007). 396-452.
Jann K. Kleffner. The Legal Fog of an Illusion: Three Reflections on ‘Organization’ and ‘Intensity’ as Criteria for the Temporal Scope of the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. International Law Studies, 95 (2019). 161-178.
Jelena Pejic. The Protective Scope of Common Article 3: More than Meets the Eye. International Review of the Red Cross, 93, 81 (March 2011). 1-37.
Julia Grignon. The “General Close of Military Operations” as the Benchmark for the Declassification of Armed Conflicts and the End of the Applicability of International Humanitarian Law. The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 59 (2021). 80-103.
Kenneth Watkin. Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict. American Journal of International Law, 98, 1 (2004). 1-34.
Kenneth Watkin. Opportunity Lost: Organized Armed Groups and the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Interpretive Guidance. International Law and Politics, 42 (2010). 641-695.
M. Cherif Bassiouni. Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice: The Need for Accountability. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59 (1996). 9-28.
Marco Sassòli and Laura M. Olson. The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Where It Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 90, 871 (September 2008). 599-627.
Marko Milanovic. Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Vol. XIX/1, ed. Orna Ben-Naftali. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Marko Milanovic. The End of Application of International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross, 96, (2014). 163-188.
Michael N. Schmitt. International Humanitarian Law and the Targeting of Non-State Intelligence Personnel and Objects. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 30, 309 (2020). 309-347.
Michael N. Schmitt. The Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: A Critical Analysis. Harvard National Security Journal, 1 (2010). 5-44.
Michael N. Schmitt. Investigating Violations of International Law in Armed Conflict. Harvard National Security Journal, 2 (2011). 31-84.
Neil J. Melvin. Conflict in Southern Thailand: Islamism, Violence and the State in the Patani Insurgency. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, (September 2007). 1-40.
Nils Melzer. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. International Committee of the Red Cross, (May 2009). 1-85.
Noam Lubell. Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 87 (2005). 737-754.
Noam Lubell. The War (?) against Al-Qaeda. International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, ed E. Wilmshurst. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Panitan Wattanayagorn. Organized Movements and Violence in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces: Push and Pull Factors, its Operations and Possible Solution. Journal of Public Administrative and Politics, 10, 2 (2021). 76-91.
Pavle Kilibarda and Gloria Gaggioli. Detention of Suspected Terrorists in Connection with Armed Conflict: A Focus on Release and Repatriation. Prisoners of War in Contemporary Conflict, eds. Michael N. Schmitt and Christopher J. Koschnitzky. Oxford University Press, 2023.
Peter Margulies. Networks in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Crossing Borders and Defining ‘Organized Armed Group. International Law Studies, 89, 54 (2013). 54-76.
Rogier Bartels. From Jus In Bello to Jus Post Bellum: When Do Non-International Armed Conflicts End?. JUS Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, eds. Carsten Stahn et al. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Sean Aughey and Aurel Sari. Targeting and Detention in Non-International Armed Conflict: Serdar Mohammed and the Limits of Human Rights Convergence. International Law Studies, 91 (February 2015). 60-118.
Srisompob Jitpiromsri, et al. Special Issue: Quagmire of Violence in Thailand’s Southern Borderlands Chapter 1: Introduction. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 45, 2 (2018). 43-55.
Srisompob Jitpiromsri. The Deep South of Thailand: 15 Years in Fields of Open Conflict, Violence and Peace Narratives. Asian International Studies Review, 20, 1 (2019). 79-108.
The International Committee of the Red Cross. International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts. 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent at Geneva Switzerland, 8-10 December 2015.
The Patani Working Group for Monitoring on International Mechanisms, Civil Society Assembly For Peace (CAP), The Federation of Patani Students and Youth (PerMAS) and Manushya Foundation. Joint UPR Submission: Armed Conflicts & The Human Rights Situation in the Southern Border Provinces in Thailand, for the UN Universal Periodic Review of Thailand (3rd UPR Cycle). 39th Session of the UPR Working Group, 25 March 2021.
The Public Commission to Examine the Maritime Incident of 31 May 2010, Israel’s Mechanisms for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Claims of Violations of the Laws of Armed Conflict According to International Law (The Turkel Report, 2013).
Tilman Rodenhäuser. Strengthening IHL protecting persons deprived of their liberty: Main aspects of the consultations and discussions since 2011. International Review of the Red Cross, 98, 3 (2016). 941-959.
Tirawat Pratumthong. International Humanitarian Law and Legal Protection for Life and Body of Civilians in Armed Conflict Situations in the Southern Border Provinces. Graduate Law Journal, 16, 1 (2023). 23-41.
William Schabas. Lex specialis? Belt and suspenders? The parallel operation of human rights law and the law of armed conflict, and the conundrum of jus ad bellum. Israel Law Review, 40 (2007). 592-613.
Yoram Dinstein. Concluding Remarks on Non-International Armed Conflicts. International Law Studies, U.S Naval War College, 88 (2012). 399-421.
วิทยานิพนธ์ภาษาต่างประเทศ
Sascha Helbardt. Deciphering Southern Thailand’s violence: organization and insurgent practices of BRN-Coordinate. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Passau, 2011.
ออนไลน์ภาษาไทย
รายงานของคณะกรรมการอิสระสอบข้อเท็จจริง กรณีมีผู้เสียชีวิตในเหตุการณ์อําเภอตากใบ จังหวัดนราธิวาส (Report of Independent Commission of Enquiry on Death Incident at Tak Bai, Narathiwat Province 25 October 2004). [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://prachatai.com/sites/default/files/special/takbai.pdf [3 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]
รายงานคณะกรรมการอิสระไต่สวนข้อเท็จจริงกรณีเหตุการณ์มัสยิดกรือเซะ (Report of Commission of Enquiry on Krue Se Mosque incident): ภาคแรก, 26 กรกฎาคม 2547. [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://prachatai.com/sites/default/files/special/report_gresae.pdf [3 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]
ศรีสมภพ จิตร์ภิรมย์ศรี. ฐานข้อมูลศูนย์เฝ้าระวังชายแดนใต้. [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://deepsouthwatch.org/th/node/12816 [10 มกราคม 2565]
สถานวิจัยความขัดแย้งและความหลากหลายทางวัฒนธรรมภาคใต้ สถาบันสันติศึกษา (Center for Conflict Studies and Cultural Diversity (CSCD), Institute for Peace Studies). สถิติสะสมเหตุการณ์ชายแดนใต้ (Summary of Incidents in Southern Thailand). [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://cscd.psu.ac.th/th [13 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]
สำนักข่าวอิศรา. 17 ปีไฟใต้...ความรุนแรงยังไม่จางหาย สารพัดเหตุร้ายผสมโรง. [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : www.isranews.org/article/south-news/south-slide/94729-anniversary.html [5 มกราคม 2564]
ออนไลน์ภาษาต่างประเทศ
Amnesty International. Appendix II They Took Nothing but His Life. [online] Available from : https://www.amnesty.or.th/files/5515/5497/4999/2011_southern_report_EN.pdf [24 January 2025]
Amnesty International. Thailand: Torture in the Southern Counter-Insurgency. [online] Available from : https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa39/001/2009/en/ [10 August 2021]
Andrew Clapham. The Rights and Responsibilities of Armed Non-State Actors: The Legal Landscape & Issues Surrounding Engagement. [online] Available from : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1569636 [17 March 2010]
Anyamanee Keawakho. Without justice, little hope for peace by Vitit Muntarbhorn, Bangkok Post. [online] Available from : https://crcfthailand.org/2008/09/11/202/ [24 January 2025]
Don Pathan. Conflict Management and Resolution in Asia: The Role of Civil Societies in Thailand’s Deep South. [online] Available from : https://peaceresourcecollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Don-Pathan-OP18_Confict-Deep-South-Thailand.pdf [18 October 2012]
Federal Political Department. Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: Geneva 1974-1977 - Vol.VII. [online] Available from : https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llmlp/RC-records_Vol-7/RC-records_Vol-7.pdf [3 February 2025]
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Renewed Fighting Prompts the Reclassification of a Non-International Armed Conflict in Southern Thailand. [online] Available from : https://www.geneva-academy.ch/news/detail/559-renewed-fighting-prompts-the-reclassification-of-a-non-international-armed-conflict-in-southern-thailand [15 November 2023]
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Rules of Engagement Protecting Civilians through Dialogue with Armed Non-State Actors. [online] Available from : https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Research%20documents/Rules-of-Engagement-EN.pdf [3 February 2025]
Geneva Call. Deed of Commitment under Geneva Call for the Protection of Children from the Effects of Armed Conflict. [online] Available from : http://theirwords.org/media/transfer/doc/doc_brn_children_english-bcfab04b9b7e0d829b228ca02dde95f2.pdf [24 January 2025]
Gloria Gaggioli. The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms. [online] Available from : www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-4171.pdf [21 September 2023]
Hadi Azmi. Can Thai Separatists and Bangkok Agree on Peace in Talks Brokered by Malaysia?. [online] Available from : https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/explained/article/3162267/can-thai-separatists-and-bangkok-agree-peace-talks-brokered [11 January 2022]
Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State. Remarks at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: The Obama Administration and International Law. [online] Available from : https://2009-2017.State.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/139119.htm [25 March 2010]
Human Rights Watch. No One Is Safe Insurgent Attacks on Civilians in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces. [online] Available from : https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/08/27/no-one-safe/insurgent-attacks-civilians-thailands-southern-border-provinces [28 August 2007]
Human Rights Watch. Thailand: Separatists Target Civilians for Attack. [online] Available from : https://www.hrw.org/news/2007/08/28/thailand-separatists-target-civilians-attack [28 August 2007]
ICRC. Expert Meeting on Procedural Safeguards for Security Detention in Non-International Armed Conflict: Chatham House & ICRC, London, 22-23 September 2008. [online] Available from : www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/security-detention-chatham-icrc-report-091209.pdf [3 February 2025]
ICRC. The Use of Force in Armed Conflicts Interplay between the Conduct of Hostilities and Law Enforcement Paradigms. [online] Available from : www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-4171.pdf [3 February 2025]
International Committee of the Red Cross. How Is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law?: Opinion paper - March 2008. [online] Available from : https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf [24 January 2025]
International Crisis Group. Southern Thailand’s Stop-Start Peace Dialogue: Crisis Group Asia Briefing N°176, 25 May 2023. [online] Available from : icg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2023-05/b176-southern-thailands-peace-dialogue.pdf [24 January 2025]
International Crisis Group. Thailand: The Evolving Conflict in the South: Asia Report No. 241 - 11 December 2012. [online] Available from : https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/thailand/thailand-evolving-conflict-south [24 January 2025]
International Institute of Humanitarian Law. The Manual on the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict With Commentary. [online] Available from : https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/ccf497/pdf [24 January 2025]
Jay Lamey. Peace in Patani? The Prospect of a Settlement in Southern Thailand. [online] Available from : https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/sta.bt [29 December 2022]
Mariyam Ahmad. Coordinated bombings, arson attacks hit Thai south. [online] Available from : https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/thai/thai-deep-south-hit-bombings-arson-03222024053516.html [22 March 2024]
Rogier Bartels. Temporal Scope of Application of IHL: When Do Non-International Armed Conflicts End? Part 2. [online] Available from : http://opiniojuris.org/2014/02/19/guest-post-bartels-temporal-scope-application-ihl-non-international-armed-conflicts-end-part-2/ [19 February 2014]
Rogier Bartels. The Organisational Requirement for the Threshold of Non-International Armed Conflict Applied to the Syrian Opposition. [online] Available from : https://www.armedgroups-internationallaw.org/2012/08/09/the-organisational-requirement-for-the-threshold-of-non-international-armed-conflict-applied-to-the-syrian-opposition/ [9 August 2012]
Rogier Bartels. When Do Terrorist Organisations Qualify as ‘Parties to an Armed Conflict’ Under International Humanitarian Law?. [online] Available from : https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209305 [28 January 2023]
Sascha Helbardt. Anatomy of Southern Thailand’s Insurgency: Some Preliminary Insights. [online] Available from : https://www.newmandala.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Anatomy-of-Southern-ThailandтАЩs-Insurgency.pdf [3 February 2025]
Sunai Phasuk. Southern Thailand Peace Efforts Should Promote Rights. [online] Available from : www.hrw.org/news/2020/02/07/southern-thailand-peace-efforts-should-promote-rights [28 October 2020]
Thanet Aphornsuvan. Origins of Malay Muslim “Separatism” in Southern Thailand, (Asia Research Institute Working Paper No. 32, October 2004). [online] Available from : https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/wps04_032.pdf [24 January 2025]
The Public Committee against Torture in Israel et al v. The Government of Israel et al. The Supreme Court of Israel sitting as the High Court of Justice, Judgment, 11 December 2005, HCJ 769/02. [online] Available from : http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/Israel/Targetted_Killings_Supreme_Court_13-12-2006.pdf [3 February 2025]
The Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts (RULAC). Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Non-International Armed Conflict in Thailand. [online] Available from : www.rulac.org/browse/conflicts/non-international-armed-conflict-in-thailand#collapse2accord [22 August 2022]
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict. [online] Available from : https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/HR_in_armed_conflict.pdf [3 February 2025]
Zachary Abuza. In 2023, Expect More Violence in Thailand’s Insurgency-Hit Deep South. [online] Available from : www.benarnews.org/english/commentaries/asean-security-watch/abuza-deep-south-outlook-01062023110624.html [6 January 2023]
Zachary Abuza. The Ongoing Insurgency in Southern Thailand: Trends in Violence, Counterinsurgency Operations, and the Impact of National Politics. [online] Available from : https://inss.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/stratperspective/inss/Strategic-Perspectives-6.pdf [24 January 2025]
กฎหมายภาษาไทย
ประกาศ เรื่อง การขยายระยะเวลาการประกาศสถานการณ์ฉุกเฉินที่มีความร้ายแรงในเขตท้องที่จังหวัดนราธิวาส ยกเว้นอำเภอยี่งอ อำเภอสุไหงโก-ลก อำเภอแว้ง และอำเภอสุคิริน จังหวัดปัตตานี ยกเว้นอำเภอยะหริ่ง อำเภอปะนาเระ อำเภอมายอ อำเภอไม้แก่น อำเภอทุ่งยางแดง อำเภอกะพ้อ และอำเภอแม่ลาน และจังหวัดยะลา ยกเว้นอำเภอเบตง อำเภอยะหา อำเภอรามัน อำเภอกาบัง และอำเภอกรงปินัง. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, เล่มที่ 142 ตอนพิเศษที่ 12 ง, วันที่ 20 มกราคม 2568.
ประกาศ เรื่อง กําหนดลักษณะความผิดอันมีผลกระทบต่อความมั่นคงภายในราชอาณาจักร ตามมาตรา 21 แห่งพระราชบัญญัติการรักษาความมั่นคงภายในราชอาณาจักร พ.ศ. 2551. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, เล่มที่ 140 ตอนพิเศษที่ 239 ง, วันที่ 27 กันยายน 2566.
พระราชบัญญัติบังคับการให้เป็นไปตามอนุสัญญาเจนีวาเกี่ยวกับการปฏิบัติต่อเชลยศึก ลงวันที่ 12 สิงหาคม พ.ศ. 2492 พ.ศ. 2498. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่มที่ 72 ตอนที่ 83, วันที่ 18 ตุลาคม 2498. (Implementation of the Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War 1949 Act, B.E. 2498)
กฎหมายภาษาต่างประเทศ
Ahmet Özkan and others v. Turkey, App no. 21689/93, ECtHR [6 April 2004], Para. 305-306.
Al-Skeini and Others v. UK, ECtHR, Appl. No. 55721/07, Judgment, 7 July 2011, Para. 164.
Article 121 of GC III.
Article 131 of GC IV.
Article 16 of Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations, B.E. 2548 (2005).
Article 49 of GCI.
Article 50 of GCII.
Article 51(5)(b) of AP I.
Article 85 of AP I.
Articles 129 of GCIII.
Articles 146 of GCIV.
Common Article 1 to the four Geneva Conventions 1949.
Final Report of the Independent Commission of Enquiry on the Krue Se Mosque Case, July 26, 2004.
General Comment no 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant, Human Rights Committee, Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (26 May 2004).
Geneva Academy and ICRC, Guidelines on Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law, Geneva, September 2019.
Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations: Israel’ CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, 3 September 2010, Para. 7.
Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations: Israel’ CCPR/CO/78/ISR, 21 August 2003, Paras. 12-13
Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations: Sri Lanka’, CCPR/CO/79/LKA, 1 December 2003, Para. 13.
Human Rights Committee, ‘Concluding Observations: United States of America’, CCPR/C/USA/CO/3, 15 September 2006, Para. 18.
Human Rights Committee, “General Comment No. 35, Article 9: Liberty and security of person, Para. 67.
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Democratic Republic of the Congo, CCPR/C/COD/CO/3, 26 April 2006 (generally applying the ICCPR in non-international armed conflicts).
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: United Kingdom, CCPR/C/GBR/CO/6, 30 July 2008, Para. 14.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 29, Para. 11.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 31.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 29: States of Emergency (Article 4), Para. 3, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11 (July 24, 2001).
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant Adopted on 29 March 2004, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13, Para. 11.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 8, Right to liberty and security of person, 30 June 1982.
Human Rights Committee, Herrera Rubio v. Colombia, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Communication No. 161/1983, Para. 11, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/161/1983 (November 2, 1987).
Human Rights Committee, Sarma v Sri Lanka, CCPR/C/78/D/950/2000, 31 July 2003.
Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic’, UN Doc A/HRC/21/50, 16 August 2012, 47, Annex II [10].
ICC, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08, 21 March 2016, Para. 140.
ICC, Prosecutor v. Bemba, ICC-01/05-01/08, 21 March 2016, Para. 141.
ICC, Prosecutor v. Katanga, Trial Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/07, 7 March 2014, Paras. 1216-1218.
ICC, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment (Trial Chamber), 14 March 2012, Para. 536.
ICC, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012, Para. 548.
ICJ, Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), 19 December 2005, Paras. 216-217.
ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 9 July 2004, Para. 106.
ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 8 July 1996, Para. 25.
ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 8 July 1996, Para. 64.
ICRC, Commentary on the First Geneva Convention: Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 2nd ed., Geneva, 2016, Para. 491.
ICRC, Commentary to the Geneva Convention I for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in the Armed Force in the Field, Para. 728 (2d ed. 2016).
ICRC, Internment in Armed Conflict: Basic Rules and Challenges, Opinion Paper, November 2014.
ICTY, Prosecutor v Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj, Lahi Brahimaj, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 3 April 2008, Case No IT-04-84-T at Para. 100.
ICTY, Prosecutor v Rutaganda, Case No ICTR-96-3, Judgement, 6 December 1999, Para 93.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Boškoski, Case No. IT-04-82-T, 10 July 2008, Paras. 177-178.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Boškoski, Case No. IT-04-82-T, 10 July 2008, Paras. 187 and 190.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Boskoski, Case No. IT-04-82-T, Judgement (Trial Chamber), 10 July 2008, Para. 190.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Bośkoski, IT-04-82-T, 10 July 2008, Para. 193.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić IT-94-1-T, (7 May 1997) [Judgement] Para. 562.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Case No. IT-06-90-T, Judgment (Trial Chamber), 15 April 2011, Para. 1694.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj et al, Trial Judgement, 3 April 2008, Case No. IT-04-84-T, Para. 60.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj et al., Case No. IT-04-84-T, Judgment (Trial Chamber), 3 April 2008, Para. 100.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, et al., Case No. IT-04-84-T, Judgment (Trial Chamber), 3 April 2008, Para. 69, 89
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovac and Vokovic, Case No. IT-96-23 and IT-96-23/1 (Appeals Chamber), 12 June 2002, Para 56.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Judgement, IT-03-66-T, 30 November 2005, Para 170.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Judgement, Para. 89, 132.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Limaj, Judgement, Para. 90, 94-134.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Naser Oric (Trial Judgment), IT-03-68-T, 30 June 2006, Para. 254.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al., Trial Chamber I (Judgment), Case No. IT-04-84-T, 3 April 2008, Para 49..
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995, Para 70.
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić, IT-96-21-T, Judgement (Trial Chamber), 16 November 1998, Para. 185.
Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Commissions of Inquiry and Fact-Finding Missions on International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Guidance and Practice, New York and Geneva, 2015.
Public Committee against Torture et al v Government of Israel et al, 13 December 2006, Para. 40.
Report of the detailed findings of the independent international Commission of inquiry on the protests in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (18 March 2019) A/HRC/40/CRP.2, Para. 106.
Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, A/HRC/21/50, 15 August 2012.
Report of the International Commission of Inquiry to investigate all alleged violations of international human rights law in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya’, UN Human Rights Council, UN Doc A/HRC/17/44, 1 June 2011, Para. 72.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, UN Doc.A/68/382, 13 September 2013, Para. 52.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions (Philip Alston), ‘Study on targeted killings’ A/HRC/14/24/Add.6, (28 May 2010), Para. 11.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary executions (Philip Alston), E/CN.4/2006/53, 8 March 2006, Para. 36.
Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, ‘United Nations Basic Principles and Guidelines on the right of anyone deprived of their liberty to bring proceedings before a court’ WGAD/CRP.1/2015, (4 May 2015), Paras. 22-23.
Section 11(1) of Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations, B.E. 2548 (2005).
Section 12 of Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations, B.E. 2548 (2005).
Section 13bis of The Criminal Procedure Code.
Section 15bis of Martial Law, B.E. 2457 (1914).
Section 16 of Martial Law, B.E. 2457 (1914).
Section 17 of Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations, B.E. 2548 (2005).
Section 21 of Internal Security Act 2008.
Section 23 of Internal Security Act 2008.
Section 66 of The Criminal Procedure Code.
Section 72 of Juvenile and Family Court and Procedure Act B.E. 2553 (2010).
Section 74 of Juvenile and Family Court and Procedure Act B.E. 2553 (2010).
The High Court of Justice of England and Wales (EWHC), Serdar Mohammed v. Ministry of Defence, [2014] EWHC 1369 (QB), 2 May 2014, Paras. 243, 287.
The High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Mohamet Bici Skender v Ministry of Defence, 2004 EWHC 786(QB).
The ICTY was established to prosecute individuals responsible for serious violations of IHL, committed after the breakup of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, New York/Geneva, 2017, Paras. 20-22.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, New York/Geneva, 2017, Para. 21.
The Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, UN Doc A/HRC/S-17/2/Add.1, 23 November 2011, at Paras. 97-99.
U.N. Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 35: Article 9 (Liberty and Security of Person), Para. 15, U.N.Doc. CCPR/GC/35 (16 December 2014).
UN Commission on Human Rights, ‘Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions: Report of the Special Rapporteur, Philip Alston’, E/CN.4/2005/7, 22 December 2004, Para. 76.
UN Commission on Human Rights, ‘Report of the Working Group on Involuntary or Enforced Disappearances: Mission to Nepal’, E/CN.4/2005/65/Add.1 (28 January 2005) Para. 45.
UN Commission on Human Rights, ‘Situation of Detainees at Guantanamo Bay’, E/CN.4/2006/120, 27 February 2006, Para. 19.
United Nations Basic Principles on the use of force and firearms by law enforcement officials, 1990, Art. 9.
Yves Sandoz, Christophe Swinarski and Bruno Zimmermann, Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, ICRC, Geneva, 1987, Para. 4789.
(Goldstone Report) Human Rights in Palestine and other Occupied Arab Territories: Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Para. 1611, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/12/48, September 15, 2009.