PERFORMANCE MOTIVATION OF TEACHERS AND LEADERSHIP OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AFFECTING EFFECTIVENESS FOR THE SCHOOLS UNDER THE OFFICE OF SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA 9
Keywords:
Performance Motivation of Teachers, The Secondary Educational Service Area Office 9Abstract
The purposes of this research were to study motivation, relationship, factors in performance of teachers and leadership of administrators affecting to effectiveness for schools and to develop prediction equation for effectiveness of schools under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9. The sample used in this study were 338 teachers of 2016 academic year under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 using stratified random sampling as size of school. The instrument used in data collection was 5 Levels Rating Scale with all of 3 sections, namely questionnaire for the opinion on performance motivation of teachers, leadership of school administrators and effectiveness for schools under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 with discrimination being between 28-83, reliability being equal to .86, .87, .96 and .93 respectively. Computer program was used in data analysis. Statistics used in data analysis were mean (), standard deviation (SD), Pearson’s product moment correlation and Stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Results of study found that:
1. The factors on the success in working, work attribute in performance, responsibility, recognition and performance motivation of teachers under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 in overview and each aspect were at all much level.
2.The factors on the organization atmosphere of schools, performance motivation of teachers and leadership of administrators generally had statistically significantly positive relationship with school effectiveness under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 at moderate and high levels of .01
3. The factors on the performance motivation of teachers and leadership of administrators affected statistically significantly positive aspect to schools under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 at level of .01
4. Prediction equation for effectiveness of schools under the Office of Secondary Education Service Area 9 was 73.60 percent by writing as raw scores equation as follows:
Y = .813 + .313X22 + .093X13 + .182X21 + .094X15 + .131X11
Z= .408X22 + .099X13 + .216X21 + .140X15 + .128X11
References
Juykang , S. (2007). A study of relationship between leadership of school administrators and Satisfaction of Teachers in Basic Education Institutes under Nakhon Ratchasima Educational Service Area Office Area 1. Bangkok : Nakhon
Ratchasima Rajabhat University (in Thai)
Krejcie, R. V. & D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for researchactivities, Education and Psychological Measurement. New York: Harper Collins.
Kanpon, Y. (2008). The study of the relation between the leadership styles of administrators and teacher’s job motivation in basic school under Surin educationak service area office 2. Bangkok: Surindra Rajabhat University (in Thai)
Lekduang, P. (2011). Academic Leadership of School Administrators District Office Suphan Buri Field 2. Bangkok: Educational Administration, faculty of education, Burapha University. (in Thai)
Office of Education Region 9, (2016). Action Plan for the fiscal year 2016. Suphan Buri: Area of Education Region 9
Phongam, S. (2007). Relationship between leadership change of school administrators. Under the Office of Sakaeo Education Service Area 2. Bangkok: Burapha University. (in Thai)
Rongseang, A. (2006). Some Factors of Professional School Administrators Affecting the Effectiveness of Small School Administration. Under the Office of Kalasin Educational Service Area 3. Bangkok: Auther. (in Thai)
Seangnongben, J. (2013). Relationship between educational management and effectiveness of Rayong Kindergarten under Rayong Provincial Primary Education Office Area 1. Bangkok: Educational Administration, faculty of education, Burapha University. (in Thai)
Sakiddeewanit, S. (2009). Modern Organization Behavior. Bangkok: Thammasat University (in Thai)
Thaneewan, K. (2010). Factor influencing schools effectiveness under the office of yasothorn education service area. Bangkok: Educational Administration, faculty of education, Burapha University. (in Thai)
Thintawee, R. (2012). The effectiveness of Lab Schools Project under the Chonburi Primary educational service area office 2. Bangkok: Burapha University. (in Thai)
Watthaisong, A. (2002). Leadership in Educational Administration. Songkhla: Faculty of Education, Thaksin University
Wareerit, A. (2010). The relationship between leadership change and school administrators. Effectiveness of schools under Loei Education Service Area Office 1-3. Bangkok: Loei Rajabhat University (in Thai)
Yama, N. (2010). Management incentives of elementary school administrators, district offices. Narathiwat Primary Education Area. Bangkok: Educational Administration, faculty of education, Burapha University. (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
"บทความวิชาการในวารสารฉบับนี้ ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนเท่านั้น"
สงวนลิขสิทธิ์ตามพระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์
