Dialogic Communication Theory in the Age of Corporate Activism: A Postmodern Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dialogic Communication Theory, in the past 20 years, has become a touchstone for the use of digital communication in the fields of public relations and marketing. It’s based on the premise that organizations engage individuals in a dialogue that would be mutually beneficial and lead to consensus building. Today, however, some researchers are disrupting the theory by theorizing that corporations are also using social media to enunciate their core values and encourage public discussion, not necessarily consensus. Numerous consumer surveys show that an organization’s customers are increasingly expecting corporations to express their views and based on that view, decide to purchase a product or increase their brand loyalty. A corporate stance on current social and political issues, however, has risks. Consumers who agree with the stance may boost the corporate reputation and sales, but those who disagree may reduce their purchases or even boycott the organization. This poses challenges for chief communication officers (CCOs) and chief marketing officers (CMOs). to help Chief Executive Officers (CEOs)determine what issues are relevant to the corporation/s core values and how to best convey the corporation’s viewpoint in the marketplace of public opinion.
Article Details
References
ii Taylor, M. & Taylor, M. (2014). Dialogic engagement: clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384-398.
iii Grunig, J. & Grung, L. (1992) Models of Public Relations and Communication, Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, 285-325, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
iv Heath, R. (1990). Corporate issues management: Theoretical Underpinnings and research foundations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2(1-4), 29-65.
v Uysal, N. (2018). On the relationship between dialogic communication and corporate social performance: advancing dialogic theory and research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 100-114.
vi Ciszik, E. & Logan, N. (2018). Challenging the dialogic promise: how Ben & Jerry’s support for Black Lives Matter fosters dissensus on social media, Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 115-127.
vii Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
viii Walker, S. (2018, July 28-29)). Rules for CEOs in the Age of Activism. Wall Street Journal, B6.
ix Gelles, D. (2018, March 9). Merck CEO Ken Frazier on Death Row Cases and the Corporate Soul. Retrieved from New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2018/03/09/ business/merck-ceo-ken-frazier-on-death-row-case-and-the-corporate-soul.html.
x Nassauer, S. (2018, March 6). To Win More Fans, Walmart Takes a Stand on Politics. Wall Street Journal, 1,A9.
xi Center for Political Accountability (2018). Collision Course: The Risks Companies Face When Their Political Spending and Core Values Conflict and How to Address Them, 1-35. Retrieved from http://files.political accountability.net/reports/cpa-reports/final_draft_collision_report.pdf.
xii Edelman Earned Brand report (2018). Brands Take a Stand. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/default/files/2018-10/2018-Earned_Brand_Global_Report.pdf.
xiii Edelman research finds two-thirds of consumers worldwide now buy on beliefs (2018). Retrieved from Bulldog Reporter, https>//www.agilitypr.com//pr-news/public-relations/Edelman-research-finds-two-thirds-of-consumers-worldwide-now-buy-on-beliefs, October 10.
xivCEO Activism in 2018” The Purposeful CEO (2018). Retrieved from https://www.webershandwich.com/wup-content/uploads/2018-07/CEO-Activisim-2018_Purposeful-CEO.pdf.
xv Winchel, B. (2018, January 24)). 66 percent of consumers prefer a strong stand on political and social issues. Retrieved from https://www.ragan.com/main/articles/53829.axpx
xvi Winchel, B. (2018, September 7). Report: CEOs taking a stand online can boost reputation and sales. Retrieved from https://www.ragan.com/report-ceos-taking-a-stand-online-can -boost-reputation-and-sales/.
xvii Silcon Valley Employees Flex Newfound Political Muscles (2018, July 13)). New York Times, retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/reuters//2018/0713/business/ 13reuters-tech-rights.html
xviii Gray, A. & Johnson, E. (2018, September 5)). Nike suffers backlash over Kaepernick move. Financial Times, 15.
xix Ciszek, E. & Logan, N. (2018). Challenging the dialogic promise: how Ben & Jerry’s support for Black Lives Matter fosters dissensus on social media, Journal of Public Relations Research (30/2),3, 115-127.
xx Dasilva, A. (2017, December 21). CSR year in review – the top 10 trends of 2017. Retrieved from Bulldog Reporter,https://agilitypr.com/pr-news/public-relations-year-in-review-top-10trends-2017,
xxi Walker, S. (2018, July 28-29). Rules for CEOs in the Age of Activism. Wall Street Journal, B6
xxii Fuhrmans, V. (2018, February 25-25). Some Companies Cut NRA Ties. Wall Street Journal, B4.
xxiii Gray, A. & Johnson, E. . (2018, September5). Nike suffers backlash over Kaepernick move. Financial Times, 15.
xxiv Nassauer, S. (2018, March 6). To Win More Fans, Walmart Takes a Stand on Politics. Wall Street Journal, ,A9.
xxv Center for Political Accountability (2018). Collision Course: The Risks Companies Face When Their Political Spending and Core Values Conflict and How to Address Them, 1-35. Retrieved from http://files.political accountability.net/reports/cpa-reports/final_draft_collision_report.pdf. , 8
xxvi Center for Political Accountability (2018). Collision Course: The Risks Companies Face When Their Political Spending and Core Values Conflict and How to Address Them, 1-35. Retrieved from http://files.political accountability.net/reports/cpa-reports/final_draft_collision_report.pdf., 9
xxvii As political and societal Crises impact brands, PR’s role more important than ever (2018, June 31). Retrieved from Bulldog Reporter, https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/public-relations/as-political-and-societal-crises-impact-brands-prs-role-more-important-than-ever.
xxviii Ibid.