Audit Fees and Firm Performance: The Case of Thailand
คำสำคัญ:
Audit Fee, Firm Performance, Thailand, Audit Pricingบทคัดย่อ
The previous studies have evidenced that firm performance is statistically related to audit fees. The higher demand of audit fees can be varied according to the complexity of firm’s economic conditions. The audit fee can help to understand the firm performance.
This study employs data from an emerging market to evidence the association between firm performance and audit fees. By using different measures in the investigation, empirical results show that relative to firms with lower audit fees, firms with higher audit fees are more likely to have weak financial performance. This study provides additional empirical evidence to the study that employs emerging market data.
References
Beaulieu, P.R. (2001). The Effects of Judgments of New Clients' Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence, and Fees. Auding: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 85-99.
Becker, C.L. (1998).The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.
Bell,T.B., Landsman, W.R. and Shackelford, D.A. (2001). Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35–43.
Bruce, K. B., Jong‐Hag Choi, and Kang, T. (2008). Audit Quality and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecasts. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 327-349.
Charles, S.L., Glover, S.M. and Sharp, N.Y. (2010). The Association between Financial Reporting Risk and Audit Fees before and after the Historic Events Surrounding SOX. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 15-39.
Chen, K.Y., Kuen-Lin Lin and Zhou, J. (2005). Audit quality and earnings management for Taiwan IPO firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(1), 86 – 104.
DeFond, M.L. and Jiambalvo, J. (2010). Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements over Income-Increasing Accounting Methods. Contemporary Accounting Research,9(2), 415–431.
Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A. and Barragato, C.A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761-786.
Hope, O.K. and Langli, J.C. (2010). Auditor Independence in a Private Firm and Low Litigation Risk Setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573-605.
Krishnan, J. and Krishnan, J. (1997). Litigation Risk and Auditor Resignations. The Accounting Review, 72(4), 539-560.
Lai, K.W. (2009). Does audit quality matter more for firms with high investment opportunities?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(1), 33–50.
Larcker, D.F. and Richardson, S.A. (2004). Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 625–658.
Lawrence, G.A., Loeb, M.P. and Chih-Yang, T.. (2011). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301–327.
Lawrence, A., Miguel, M.M. and Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Differences in Audit-Quality Proxies Be Attributed to Client Characteristics?. The Accounting Review,86(1), 259-286.
Lyon, J.D. and Maher, M.W. (2005). The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research,43(1), 133–151.
Reed, B.J., Trombley, M.A. and Dhaliwal, D.S. (2000). Demand for Audit Quality: The Case of Laventhol and Horwath's Auditees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,15(2),183-198.
Seetharaman, A., Gul,F.A. and Lynn, S.G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1),91-115.
Sutton, S.G. (1993). Toward an Understanding of the Factors Affecting the Quality of the Audit Process. Decision Sciences, 24(1), 88–105.
Tendeloo, B.V. and Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings Management and Audit Quality in Europe: Evidence from the Private Client Segment Market. European Accounting Review. Taylor and Francis Journals, 17(3), 447-469.
Van, E. J., Inder, K.I. and Kenneth,R.J. (2002). Audit-Firm Tenure and the Quality of Finnancial Reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.
Venkataraman, R., Weber, J.P. and Willenborg, M. (2010). Litigation Risk, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings. The Accounting Review, 83(5),1315-1345.
Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
ฉบับ
บท
License
Copyright (c) 2023 วารสารการวิจัยการบริหารการพัฒนา
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆ ในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
