Collaboration of Thai Alternative Education Network Partners: A Case Study of Indigenous Education Network Partners and Children and Juvenile Network Partners

Authors

  • Kamonchanok Maneeshine Kamonchanok MPublic Administration Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand
  • Ravipa Thummachote Public Administration Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand

Keywords:

Collaboration, Network, Alternative education, Policy

Abstract

This academic article has the objective (1) To study the development of collaboration among alternative education network partners. (2)To study the factors leading to the collaboration of alternative education network partners. (3) To study the collaboration process among alternative education network partners. (4) To study the output, results,  obstacles of the collaboration process of the alternative education network partners. In regard to the research methodology, the qualitative research was used with the method of case study. Two cases were selected for the study: the indigenous education network and the children and juvenile network. 30 people Data were collected using the technique of in-depth interview.

1.the development of the collaboration of Thai alternative education network partners commenced prior to the collaboration period.. Later, they grouped together as a network of those having the same ideology in the alternative education approach.

2.In regard to factors leading to the collaboration of Thai alternative education network partners, the following was found. The most important factors are the law and policy.

  1. Concerning the collaboration process of Thai alternative education network partners, the following was found. The most important essence in the collaboration process is the mutual ideology of network members as well as honesty in the operations to ensure the success of the goals mutually set.

4.The main outcome resulting from the collaboration of Thai alternative education network partners is the mutual exchange of knowledge. In the collaboration, obstacles are in the matter of the differences of members. That affects the understanding or operational guidelines which may be from misunderstanding. The networks regularly organized discussions to foster mutual understanding. Finally, the collaboration of Thai alternative education network partners is for the outcome of learners’ happiness as a result of receiving education of their own interests and appropriate with the learners’ potentialities.

The public sector should provide opportunities for the participation from other sectors in the formulation of policy or in an issuance of the law concerning education, especially from stakeholders or those directly affected by such problems. Various sectors in the society consist of those who have knowledge and expertise in various issues occurring in their own areas. They therefore have the information for policy formulation and implementation to be in consonance with the problems and needs in a true manner.

References

วิไลลักษณ์ เยอเบอะ. (2554). เส้นทางสู่การจัดการศึกษาชนเผ่าพื้นเมือง. ค้นเมื่อ 25 พฤษภาคม 2565, จาก https://imnvoices.com/?p=589

สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์. (2525). แนวการศึกษาวิชาการบริหารงานบุคคลในความหมายที่กว้าง.กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์.

สมาคมสภาการศึกษาทางเลือกไทย (สกล.). (2563). องค์ความรู้การศึกษาทางเลือกของสังคมไทยกับแนวทางการขับเคลื่อนเพื่อการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน (รายงานวิจัย). สำนักงานกองทุนสนับสนุนการวิจัย (สกว.).

สิงหนาท ราชภัณฑารักษ์. (2563). กรอบแนวคิดในการประสานความร่วมมือระหว่างภาครัฐ ภาคเอกชน และภาคีเครือข่ายในการจัดการอุทกภัยขนาดใหญ่. วารสารการจัดการภาครัฐและเอกชน, สถาบันบัณฑิตพัฒนบริหารศาสตร์, 27(2), 101-116.

Abele, J. (2013). Bringing mind together. In H. Ibarra & M. T. Hansen (Eds.), HBR’s 10 must reads on collaboration. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66, 56-65.

Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295-326.

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma. London: Sage.

Booher, D. E. (2005). Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review, 93(4), 32-46.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 44-55.

Coombs, P. H. (1981). New strategic for improving rued family life. Essex, CT: International Council for Educational Development.

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington,DC: Georgetown University Press.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 22, 1-29.

Enroth, H. (2011). Policy network theory. London: Sage.

Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Heckscher, C., Prusak, L. & Adler, P. (2013). Building a collaborative enterprise. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Ibara, H. & Hansen, M. T. (2013). Are you a collaborative leader?. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Jackson, D. & Maddy, J. W. (2005). Ohio state university fact sheet: Introduction. Retrieved May 18, 2021, from http://ohioline.osu.edu/bc-fact/0001.html

Kast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General systems theory: Applications for organization and management. The Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447-465.

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. M. F. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. London: Routledge.

McDermott, R., & Archibald, D. (2013). Harnessing your staff’s informal network. Boston: Harvard Business School.

McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33-43.

Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierachies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and managing governance style combinations. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Morse, R. S. (2005, September). Facilitating interlocal collaboration: Community and the soft skills of public management. Working Group on Interlocal Services Cooperation. Paper 15. Retrieved May 18, 2021, from https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/interlocal_coop/15/

Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2013). Which kind of collaboration is right for you?. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Sink, D. (1996). Five obstacles to community-based collaboration and some thoughts on overcoming them. London: Sage.

Sullivan, H. & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. New York: Macmilan.

Thomson, A. M. & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 20-32.

Thomson, A.M., Perry, J. L. & Miller, T. K. (2008). Linking collaboration processes and outcomes: Foundations for advancing empirical theory. New York: ME Sharpe.

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Global education monitoring report summary 2020 inclusion and education: All means all. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2010). Introducing the theory of collaborative advantage. In S. Osborne (Ed.), New public governance: Emerging perspectives on theory and principle of public governance. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Maneeshine, K., & Thummachote, R. . (2023). Collaboration of Thai Alternative Education Network Partners: A Case Study of Indigenous Education Network Partners and Children and Juvenile Network Partners . The Journal of Development Administration Research, 13(3), 760–775. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDAR/article/view/267634

Issue

Section

Research Articles