Continuous Professional Teacher Development Model in Yunnan Provincial Universities
บทคัดย่อ
This article aims to: 1. Assess the current state of continuous professional teacher development (CPTD) in Yunnan Provincial Universities. 2. Identify key factors influencing CPTD in Yunnan Provincial Universities. 3. Propose a comprehensive CPTD model specifically for Yunnan Provincial Universities. The research design is a mixed-methods approach. The study is framed by theories including Adult Learning Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and Instructional Leadership Theory. The research area is Yunnan Province, China. The target group consists of 500 individuals, including 85 administrators and 415 teachers, selected using stratified random sampling. Additionally, 9 educational experts participated in qualitative interviews. The research tools consist of two types: 1. A structured questionnaire employing a 5-point Likert scale. 2. Semi-structured interview protocols for qualitative insights. Data were analyzed using basic descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data, and content analysis with descriptive narrative for qualitative data.
Research findings: 1. The findings related to the first objective indicate varying levels of CPTD engagement across universities, highlighting disparities in access to resources and institutional support. 2. The findings related to the second objective reveal that teacher job satisfaction, instructional leadership, school climate, teacher professional autonomy, and professional collaboration significantly impact CPTD, with policy support as a key mediating factor. 3. The comprehensive CPTD model proposed integrates these influencing factors, emphasizing structured policies, supportive leadership, and collaborative practices.
The findings of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and university administrators to enhance CPTD frameworks, fostering structured and sustainable professional growth among faculty members in higher education institutions.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Taro Yamane (1967). Sample size estimation.
OECD TALIS 2018 framework for continuous professional development.
Hannum, E., An, X., & Cherng, H. Y. S. (2011). Examinations and educational opportunity in China: Mobility and bottlenecks for the rural poor. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 267–305.
Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard Education Press.
Bryson, J., Strach, P., Crosby, B., & Bryson, J. M. (2020). Inclusive faculty development programs and diversity promotion. Educational Administration Quarterly.
Daou, S., & El Hajj, H. (2023). Faculty challenges and career advancement in higher education. Journal of Professional Development.
Qian, H., Zhang, M., & Tang, J. (2024). Principal leadership and professional learning communities: International and Chinese perspectives. Educational Leadership Review.
Zhang, X., & Hu, X. (2023). Challenges of professional development for remote university teachers in China. Journal of Teacher Development.
Zhou, G., & Hu, X. (2024). Constructing an internal quality assurance system in higher education institutions: International experiences and China's path. Higher Education Policy.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 วารสารการวิจัยการบริหารการพัฒนา
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆ ในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
