Connecting Multicultural Landscapes and Public Open Spaces: A Case Study of the Kudi Chin Community, Bangkok, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kudi Chin is a historic riverside community in Bangkok, Thailand, where Buddhist, Islamic, Christian, and Chinese cultural traditions coexist within a shared urban landscape. Its network of religious places, open spaces, circulation routes, and waterways reflects a long history of cultural coexistence. This study explores the spatial characteristics and degrees of publicness of cultural open spaces in Kudi Chin, their relationships with circulation routes and surrounding waterways, and their potential to contribute to a connected multicultural landscape while maintaining the distinctive identity of individual places. A qualitative case study approach was adopted, focusing on four cultural sites: Wat Kanlayanamit, Kudi Khaw Mosque, Santa Cruz Church, and Kian Un Keng Shrine. Site observations conducted in January 2026 examined three dimensions: spatial configuration, quality, and degree of publicness; connections, networks, circulation, and spatial relationships; and the temporal dimension of cultural use and activities. The findings show that the four cultural open spaces have distinct spatial configurations, degrees of openness and enclosure, and relationships with surrounding residential, community, and religious spaces. Streets, alleys, pedestrian routes, and public spaces connect these cultural places as part of a fine-grained spatial network, although pedestrian conditions and connections with the Chao Phraya River and Bangkok Yai Canal remain limited. High embankments and restricted access weaken visual and physical relationships between communities and waterways. Recurring cultural and religious activities further activate these spaces at different times of the year, may reinforcing their cultural significance. The study suggests that strengthening Kudi Chin as a multicultural landscape should build upon existing cultural places and spatial networks while improving pedestrian connections and relationships with waterways. This provides a landscape-architecture perspective on multicultural landscapes that emphasises the spatial relationships among culturally diverse places within a shared historic urban environment.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design (2nd ed.). Architectural Press.
Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 14(3), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007
Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban Studies, 57(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727
Ganji, F., & Rishbeth, C. (2020). Conviviality by design: The socio-spatial qualities of spaces of intercultural urban encounters. Urban Design International, 25(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00128-4
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
Ghouchani, M., Taji, M., & Kordafshari, F. (2019). The effect of qibla direction on the hierarchy of movement in mosque: A case study of mosques in Yazd, Iran. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(3), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.01.002
Google Maps. (n.d.). [Field survey map for data collection]. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://maps.app.goo.gl/THrvBwu5P7DTsLNUA
Hararak, P. (2001). The evolution and settlement patterns of Kudi Chin and Wat Kalaya communities, Bangkok [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2001.1590
Iyemori, T., Hashizume, M., Saito, A., Nose, M., Choosakul, N., Tsuda, T., & Odagi, Y. (2011). Geomagnetism and the orientation of temples in Thailand. The Journal of the Siam Society, 99, 139–149. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/158382
Kräuchi, K. (2021). How has a Christian church been aligned towards the East? Conclusions from statistical analyses of churches built between 300 and 1300. Archaeometry, 63(3), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12622
Liu, C. Y. (2015). Concepts of architectural space in historical Chinese thought. In M. J. Powers & K. R. Tsiang (Eds.), A companion to Chinese art (pp. 195–211). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118885215.ch9
Low, S. M. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/747135
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. Macmillan.
Nissen, S. (2008). Urban transformation from public and private space to spaces of hybrid character. Czech Sociological Review, 44(6), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.6.04
Pafka, E. (2022). Multi-scalar urban densities: From the metropolitan to the street level. Urban Design International, 27(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y
Rishbeth, C. (2001). Ethnic minority groups and the design of public open space: An inclusive landscape? Landscape Research, 26(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390120090148
Rishbeth, C. (2004). Ethno-cultural representation in the urban landscape. Journal of Urban Design, 9(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480042000283878
Rishbeth, C., Ganji, F., & Vodicka, G. (2018). Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice. Local Environment, 23(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000
Sauer, C. O. (1925). The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geography, 2(2), 19–53.
Shinawatra, W. (2012). Understanding cultural landscapes in Thai urban context: Bangkok as a neglected water-based city. In Proceedings of the 6th South East Asian Technical University Consortium (SEATUC) Symposium. https://soad.kmutt.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2012IntC3.pdf
Sim, D. (2019). Soft city: Building density for everyday life. Island Press.
Singkhajorn, S., Jarujutarat, J., Phuhirun, E., & Chuensupantharat, N. (2024). Creative community tourism development based on Kudeejeen community identity, Thailand. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 5(1). https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJCM/article/view/2535
Sripipatporngul, P., & Peeraphatchara, C. (2024). Community-based cultural gastronomy tourism route in Kudi Chin community. Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 6(1), 179–193. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/art/article/view/274943
Unakul, M. H. (2012). Reconnecting Bangkok’s heritage landscape: Urban waterways and the modern city. The Journal of the Siam Society, 100, 183–208. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pub_jss/article/view/158306
UNESCO. (2019). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/178167
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
Wessendorf, S. (2014). ‘Being open, but sometimes closed’: Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510415
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108