Risk Management Guideline for Occupational Standard and Professional Qualification Process in Thailand

Mali Chansunthorn; Pakpong Pochanart

Authors

Mali Chansunthorn Graduate School of Environmental Development Administration, National Institute of Development Administration
Pakpong Pochanart Graduate School of Environmental Development Administration, National Institute of Development Administration

Keywords:

Risk management, Occupational standard, Professional qualification, Functional Analysis

Abstract

This research is the qualitative aimed to conduct the risk management guideline for occupational standard and professional qualification process by collecting data from Key Informants based on purposive sampling such as consultants, working group, and endorsement board in total 49 samples with the semi-structured interviews.The data analysis was conducted with the content analysis to conclude and interpret according to the theories from the process namely 1) Publicizing the project to the target group 2) Studying occupational standards of role model countries 3) Conducting Functional Analysis to endorsement board for approval 4) Making assessment tools and 5) Testing assessment tools.The study found the significant risks from risk identification, risk analysis, and risk assessment at low and moderate levels that were concluded as follows 1) Designing PR media, format and period for specific professions 2) Set the small group for conduct Functional Analysis 3) Selecting the role model country with similar Thailand context 4) Recruitment of the working group that is relevant to the occupational standard 5) Setting Functional Analysis workshop 6) Determine the general core and specific competency classified by the public and private sector etc. 7) Design the assessment tools cover KSA and 8) Making profession experts database.

References

Aven, T. (2012). The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33-44. https://shorturl.asia/PuaC3

Chantavanich, S. (2009). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research (9th ed.). Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Chantavanich, S. (2010). Methods of Qualitative Research (18th ed.). Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Dawn, H. (2002). SDLC Project Management Risk Management Standards Version 1.1. Information Management Branch.

The Grasgow School of Art. (2023). Basic Principle of Risk Assessment. https://shorturl.asia/ZDhjt

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2009a). Risk management – Principles and guidelines ISO 31000:2009. https://shorturl.asia/U0CQF

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2009b). ISO Guide 73:2009(en) Risk management—Vocabulary. https://shorturl.asia/XxCUV

Jody, M. (2022). 5 basic principles of risk management. https://shorturl.asia/wPNYr

Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://shorturl.asia/TbCjK

Kylie, G. (2015). Using functional analysis in archival appraisal: A practical and effective alternative to traditional appraisal methodologies. The American Archivist, 78 (2), 588–591. https://shorturl.asia/f9dPj

Meindl, J. N., Denton, T. F., White, C. A., Miller, N. D., & Casey, L. B. (2017). Functional analysis results across a known and unknown assessor. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 18(1), 146-156. https://shorturl.asia/ew3jP

Ministry of Industry. (2016). The Achievement in implementation of the Government Policy and industrial Strategy Fiscal Year 2016. https://shorturl.asia/5fn0c

Office of Project Management Process Improvement (2003). Project Risk Management Handbook. https://shorturl.asia/NdSaG

Office of the Education Council. (2017a). National Qualifications Framework (Rev. ed.). https://shorturl.asia/8JAPX

Office of the Education Council. (2017b). Report of the study to review the country’s demands of manpower for production planning and human resource development.

Ongart Naiphat. (2008). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies in Behavioral and Social Science. (3rd ed.). SE-EDUCATION Public.

Project Management Process Improvement Office. (2003). Project Risk Management Handbook.

Rovins, J. E., Wilson, T. M., Hayes, J., Jensen, S. J., Dohaney, J., Mitchell, J., Johnston, D. M., & Davies, A. (2015). Risk assessment handbook. GNS Science. https://shorturl.asia/1Irux

Society for Risk Analysis (SRA). (2015a). Foundations of risk analysis, discussion document. Risk Analysis Foundation. https://shorturl.asia/SoUld

Society for Risk Analysis (SRA). (2015b). Glossary Society for Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis Foundation. https://shorturl.asia/heP7f

Stippich, W. W. (2015). 4 COSO Risk Assessment Principles of the 2013 Framework. Corporate Compliance Insights. https://shorturl.asia/H08vz

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2017). Project to Review and Formulate the Strategic Plan of Thailand Professional Qualification Institute 2017-2021.

Thailand Professional Qualification Institute (Public Organization). (2022). Occupational Standard and Professional Qualification Manual. https://www.tpqi.go.th/th/qualification

TRIS Corporation Limited. (2020). Project to assess the cost effectiveness and the economic and social value-added from the operation of Thailand Professional Qualification Institute (Public Organization) in the past five years.

Vanem, E. (2012). Ethics and fundamental principles of risk acceptance criteria. Safety Science, 50(4), 958-967. https://shorturl.asia/OtUqw

Veland, H., & Aven, T. (2015). Improving the risk assessments of critical operations to better reflect uncertainties and the unforeseen. Safety Science, 79, 206-212. https://shorturl.asia/ThFgd

Wannee Kaemkate. (2008). Research Methodology in Behavioral Science (2nd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.

Zeleňáková, M., & Zvijáková, L. (2017). Risk analysis within environmental impact assessment of proposed construction activity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 76-89. ttps://shorturl.asia/Dlokz