The Influence Factors of Customer Satisfaction On Cosmetics Purchasing Through Live Streaming
Keywords:
Live streaming commerce, Cosmetics, Impulse purchasing, Customer satisfaction, StreamerAbstract
The rapid growth of e-commerce live streaming in China has transformed consumer behavior, particularly in the cosmetics industry. China's deep internet integration fuels massive online shopping. E-commerce live streaming is driving a surge in impulse purchases (especially cosmetics), predicted to grow further. Businesses need to understand this behavior in live streams to succeed, but research specifically linking live streaming to impulse purchasing is lacking and urgently needed. This study investigates how customer characteristics (age, gender, education) and the feature of live streaming influence impulsive purchase of cosmetics purchase in live streaming, and then cognitive impulsive stimulation and psychological impulsive stimulation affect customer satisfaction of cosmetics purchase through live streaming. Quantitative data from 400 cosmetics consumers reveal that: 1) Special offers and professional streamer are primary drivers of impulse purchases; 2) Psychological stimuli outweigh cognitive factors in triggering unplanned buying; 3) While price satisfaction scores highest, product quality satisfaction remains low. The findings demonstrate that the live streaming model excels at capturing attention but requires robust quality governance to sustain consumer loyalty. Future success hinges on balancing hedonic immediacy with substantive value delivery.
References
Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
Bao, Z., & Yang J. (2022). Why online consumers have the urge to buy impulsively: Roles of serendipity, trust and flow experience[J]. Management Decision, 60(12), 3350-3365. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2021-0900
Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150182
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). (2025). 中国互联网信息中心 [China Internet]. Retrieved 12 July 2025, form https://www.cnnic.cn/index.html.
Crawford Solberg, E., Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Wanting, having, and satisfaction: Examining the role of desire discrepancies in satisfaction with income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.725
Dhanya, B. K., & Velmurugan, V. P. (2021). Influence of demographic variables on customer satisfaction on E-banking in public sector banks. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 1774- 1781. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.195
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Hossain, K., Bhowmik, A. R., & Islam, M. (2020). Evaluation of customers satisfaction: A study on Islami bank Bangladesh limited. Management Studies and Economic Systems, 5(12), 27-37. https://www.msaes.org/article_107696.html
Humble, S. (2020). Quantitative analysis of questionnaires: Techniques to explore structures and relationships. Routledge.
Huo, C., Wang X., Sadiq M. W., & Ming, P. (2023). Exploring factors affecting consumer’s impulse buying behavior in live-streaming shopping: An interactive research based upon SOR model. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231172678
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245
Liu, L. (2023). The effects of online consumer reviews on impulse buying behavior toward trust of the live streaming platform and interactivity in the context of live streaming. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 5(8), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.050809
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262630719/an-approach-to-environmental-psychology
Shang, Q., Ma H., Wang C., et al. (2023). Effects of background fitting of e-commerce Live Streaming on consumers' purchase intentions: A cognitive-affective perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S393492
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. In J. Suls, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 3-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_1
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.569
Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231
Wu, I.-L., Chiu M.-L., & Chen K.-W. (2020). Defining the determinants of online impulse buying through a shopping process of integrating perceived risk, expectation-confirmation model, and flow theory issues. International Journal of Information Management, 52, Article 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102099
Xue, J., Liang, X., Xie, T., & Wang, H. (2020). See now, act now: How to interact with customers to enhance social commerce engagement?. Information & Management, 57(6), Article 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103324
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
Yi, Y. & Nataraajan, R. (2018). Customer satisfaction in Asia. Psychology & Marketing, 35(6), 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21093
Zhang, Z., Zhang N., & Wang J. (2022). The Influencing factors on impulse buying behavior of consumers under the mode of hunger marketing in live commerce. Sustainability, 14(4), Article 2122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042122
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Business Administration and Management Journal Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Business Administration and Management Journal Review are copyrighted by the journal.
The views and opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent those of Huachiew Chalermprakiet University or any other faculty members. Each author is fully responsible for the content of their own article. Any errors or issues found are the sole responsibility of the respective author.
