Causal Model of Factors Affecting Organization Commitment in the View of Accountants in Thailand

Main Article Content

Thanniti Jiraphatthanaponsin
Mananya Thongbor
Rungtawan Boonphanakan

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was to examine the organizational commitment to factors affecting the view of accountants in Thailand. The samples were collected from 400 accountants in Thai accounting firms selected by using a multi-stage random sampling method. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results found that the model was consistent with the empirical data. The relationship is as follows: 1) Fairness of evaluation procedures was directly influenced on fairness of outcome, 2) Fairness of evaluation procedures was directly influenced on trust in superior, 3) Fairness of evaluation procedures was directly influenced on organization commitment 4) Fairness of outcome was directly influenced on trust in superior, 5) Fairness of outcome was directly influenced on Job satisfaction 6) Trust in superior was directly influenced on job satisfaction and 7) Job satisfaction was directly influenced on organization commitment. All effects were significant at p<0.10.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jiraphatthanaponsin, T., Thongbor, M. ., & Boonphanakan, R. (2022). Causal Model of Factors Affecting Organization Commitment in the View of Accountants in Thailand. Executive Journal, 42(2), 42–58. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/executivejournal/article/view/262372
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Rungtawan Boonphanakan, Udon Thani Rajabhat University

Assistant Professor

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in

experimental social psychology (Vo. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.

Ahmad, H., Ahmad, K., & Shah, I. A. (2010). Relationship between job satisfaction, job performance attitude toward work and organizational commitment. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 257-265.

Aladwan, K., Bhanugopan, R., & Fish, A. (2013). To what extent the Arab workers are committed to their organizations?. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(4), 306-326.

Al-Ahmadi, H. (2009). Factors affecting performance of hospital nurses in Riyadh. Region, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(1), 40-54.

Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1986). Organization behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Awang, Z., & Ahmad, J. H. (2010). Modelling job satisfaction and work commitment among lecturers: A case of UiTM Kelantan. Journal of Statistical Modeling

and Analytics, 1(2), 45-59.

Burney, L. L., Henle, C. A., & Widener, S. K. (2009). A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational

justice, and extra- and in-role performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 305-321.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha: An examination of theory and applications?.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

Department of Business Development. (n.d.). Rāi chư̄ samnakngān banchī nai tǣla čhangwat [List of accounting offices in each province]. Retrieved July 25, 2022,

from https://www.dbd.go.th/news_view.php?nid=469403169

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications

for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on

reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Gilliland, S. W., & Langdon, J. C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that

Promote perceptions of fairness. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice. San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group process (pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.

Hartmann, F., & Slapnicar, S. (2009). How formal performance evaluation affects trust

between superior and subordinate managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society,

(6-7), 722-737.

Hartman, L. (2000). Compliance versus integrity: The process of ethics integration. Journal of

Employment Discrimination Law, 2, 157-159.

Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., Foster, G., Rajan, M., & Ittner, C. (2009). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is

job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077-1096.

Kaleem, M. M., Jabeen, B., & Twana, M. J. (2013). Organisational justice in performance appraisal system: Impact on employees satisfaction and work performance.

International Journal of Management & Organizational Studies, 2(2), 28-37.

Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (1998). Advanced management accounting (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Kumari, N., & Afroz, N. (2013). The impact of affective commitment in employees life

satisfaction. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Interdisciplinary,

(7), 24-30.

Kumari, N. (2014). Using performance appraisal as an effective tool for motivating the

employees’ performance: A live study. Business Perspectives & Research,

(2), 37-46.

Lau, C. M., & Lim, E. W. (2002). The effects of procedural justice and evaluative styles on the relationship between budgetary participation and performance. Advances in Accounting, 19, 139-160.

Lau, C. M., & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral effects of nonfinancial measures: The role of

procedural fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), 55–71.

Lau, C. M., & Sholihin, M. (2005). Financial and nonfinancial measures: How do they affect

job satisfaction? The British Accounting Review, 37(4), 389-413.

Lau, C. M., & Tan, S. L. C. (2006). The effects of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust on job tension in budgeting. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 171-186.

Lewicki, R. J., Wiethoff, C., & Tomlinson, E. (2005). What is the role of trust in organizational

justice?. In J. Greenberg, & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 247–270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lieberman, J. K. (1981). The litigious society. New York: Basic Books.

Libby, T. (1999). The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative

budgeting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 125-137.

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice (critical Issues

in social justice). New York: Springer.

Lindquist, T. M. (1995). Fairness as an antecedent to participative budgeting: Examining the effects of distributive justice, procedural justice and referent cognitions on satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7,

–147.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.

Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Campbell, T. L. (1995). The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers:

A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(7-8), 611-618.

Marshall, E. M. (2000). Building trust at the speed of change: The power of the relationship based corporation. New York: American Management Association.

Meksuk, C., & Pasunon, P. (2017). Quality of work life factors affecting organization commitment of operational staffs of Siam Fittings Company Limited. Business Review, 9(1), 33-50.

Panggabean, M. (2001). Impact of perceived justice in performance appraisal on work attitudes and performance (Tesis peringkat doktor falsafah, The Nova Southeastern University).

Pitiphat, S. (2022). Motivation factors affecting virtual goods purchase intention in online games of generation Z consumer. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(1), 180-197.

Reynolds, L. (1997). The trust effect: Creating the high trust high performance organization.

London: Nicholas Brealey.

Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.

Rusu, G., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Linking human resources motivation to organizational climate. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 51–58.

Sahni, J. (2017). Exploring what constitutes quality in quality of work life for female employees. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(4), 785-798.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, P. A. (2012). Can performance appraisals motivate employees

to improve performance? A Mexican study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3063-3084.

Shaw, R. B. (1997). Trust in the balance: Buiding successful organization on results, integrity,

and concern. San Francisco: Josset–Bass.

Sholihin, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Investigating the determinants of perceived procedural fairness in performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 29-42.

Swiercz, P. M., Bryan, N. B., Eagle, B. W., Bizzotto, V., & Renn, R. W. (2012). Predicting employee attitudes and performance from perceptions of performance appraisal fairness. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 7(1), 25-46.

Tang, T. L., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to

satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 25-31.

Thompson, P. H., & Dalton, G. W. (1972). Performance appraisal: Managers beware. Reprint of

selected article. Performance Appraisal. Boston: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Tsai, M. T., & Huang, C. C. (2008). The relationship among ethical climate types, facets of

job satisfaction, and the three components of organizational commitment: A study of

nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 565–581.

Valaei, N., & Rezaei, S. (2016). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical

investigation among ICT-SMEs. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1663-1694.

Velickovic, M. V., Visnjic, A., Jovic, S., Radulovic, O., Sargic, C., Mihajlovic, M. J., & Mladenovic, J. (2014). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among nurses in Serbia:

A factor analysis. Nursing Outlook, 62(6), 415-427.

Warokka, A., Gallato, C. G., & Moorthy, T. (2012). Organisational justice in performance appraisal system and work performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2012, 1-18.

Wentzel, K. (2002). The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budgeting setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting,

(1), 247–271.

Yang, F. H., & Chang, C. C. (2008). Emotional labour, job satisfaction and organizational commitment amongst clinical nurses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of

Nursing Studies, 45(6), 879-887.

Yücel, I. (2012). Examining the relationships among job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention: An empirical study. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(20), 44-58.