Media Ownership Regulation: Legal Framework of Media Plurality Measurement
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Concerns about media plurality are at the heart of media law and policy. The concept of media plurality is based on the fact that, unlike other sectors, media are powerful gatekeepers of public communication; hence competition law is not sufficient to prevent media ownership concentration. Thus, a specific regulation is essential to safeguard the public interest by avoiding excessive power and concentration of media ownership. To control undue power and concentration of media, a specific regulation which enhances media plurality is necessary. This article studies various complicated factors concerning media plurality in the regulation of media ownership. It analyzes the UK framework as an example model in comparison with other jurisdictions such as the US, Canada, and the Netherlands to recognize media plurality concerns. The article found that there is no single masterpiece for an accurate evaluation of market power. Policy concerns for achieving pluralism are distinctly complex from country to country depending on their history and context. It, therefore, provides guidelines on various factors that should be taken into consideration in media ownership regulation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
Andrea Czepek and Ulrike Klinger, “Media Pluralism between Market Mechanisms and Control: The German Divide,” in International Journal of Communication 4, (2010)
Antonio Ciaglia, “Pluralism of the System, Pluralism in the System,” in International Communication Gazette 75, no.4 (2013): 410.
Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Broadcasting Act 1990 (UK), sch 2, Pt II.
Broadcasting Act 1990 (UK), sch 2, Pt IV.
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Regulatory Policy: Diversity of Voices, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2008, para 84.
Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, “Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the Year 2021,” [online] Available from : https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/74712/MPM2022-EN-N.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&fbclid=IwAR3hwSiTdvkNsXepWDbDR-O0pH05VNkOm1fOyMD2VhGqkmSddIv3q-AMcPk [27 February 2023]
Commissariaat Voor De Media, “Mediamonitor: The Dutch Media in 2010,” [online] Available from : https://www.mediamonitor.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Mediamonitor-The-Dutch-media-in-20101.pdf [27 February 2023]
Communication Act 2003 (UK), sch 14, Pt I.
Communications Management Inc, “Measuring Across Media: Key Issue in the United Kingdom', Research Note, [online] Available from : http://media-cmi.com/downloads/CMI_Research_Note_UK_Media_100411_111711.pdf [27 February 2023]
Co-ordinating Committee for Media Reform, “The Media and the Public Interest,” [online] Available from : https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The_Media_and_The_Public_Interest-Plurality_Briefing_Paper.pdf [27 February 2023]
Council of Europe, “Explanatory Memorandum to Recommendation No. R (99) 1 on Measures to Promote Media Pluralism,” [online] Available from : https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=399303&Site=CM [27 February 2023]
Council of Europe, “Media Diversity in Europe,” Media Division, Directorate General of Human Rights, [Online] Available from : https://rm.coe.int/1680483b2c [27 February 2023]
Council of Europe, “Recommendation CM/Rec(2011)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on a New Notion of Media,” [online] Available from : https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1835645&Site=CM [27 February 2023]
Dan Bernhardt et al., “Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias,” in Journal of Public Economics 92, (2008): 1092.
Davide Morisi, “Measuring Media Pluralism in the Convergence Era: The Case of News Corp’s Proposed Acquisition of BSkyB,” [online] Available from : https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/msc-dissertations/2011/74.pdf [27 February 2023]
Davine Morisi, “Response to Ofcom Consultation on Measuring Media Plurality,” [online] Available from : http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/measuring-plurality/responses/davide-morisi.pdf [27 February 2023]
Department for Trade and Industry, “Enterprise Act 2002: Public Interest Intervention in Media Mergers,” [online] Available from : https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/enterprise-act-2002-public-interest-intervention-in-media-mergers [27 February 2023]
Department of Justice of the United States, ‘Horizontal Merger Guidelines (08/19/2010),’ [online] Available from : https://www.justice.gov/atr/herfindahl-hirschman-index [27 February 2023]
Eli M Noam, ‘Are the American Media Becoming More Concentrated?’ in Media Ownership: Research and Regulation, ed. Ronald E Rice, (Hampton Press, 2008)
EU Media Futures Forum, “Fast-forward Europe: 8 Solutions to Thrive in the Digital World,” [online] Available from : http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/media_taskforce/doc/pluralism/forum/report.pdf [27 February 2023]
European Commission, Media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union, Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2007) 32, 2007
FCC, Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCCR 5922, 2008 WL 612180, 18 December 2007.
Gillian Doyle, “From ‘Pluralism’ to ‘Ownership’: Europe’s Emergent Policy on Media Concentration Navigates the Doldrums,” in The Journal of Information, Law and Technology 3, (1997).
Home Office, Broadcasting in the '90s: Competition, Choice and Quality: The Government's Plans for Broadcasting Legislation (Cm 517, 1988) paras 2.5-2.6.
Joint Committee (House of Lords and Commons), Draft Communications Bill, Vol 1 (Report, HL 169-1/HC 876-1, 2002).
Lesley Hitchen, Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation (Hart Publishing, 2006)
Lesley Hitchens, “Media Regulatory Frameworks in the Age of Broadband: Securing Diversity,” in Journal of Information Policy 1, (2011): 217.
Lord Justice Leveson, “An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press: Report Volume III,” [online] Available from : https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/270942/0780_iii.pdf [27 February 2023]
Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Parliamentary Under Secretary, DCMS) 2 July 2003, Hansard. [online] Available from : http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/2003/jul/02/communications-bill [27 February 2023]
Media Reform Coalition, “The Elephant in the Room: A Survey of Media Ownership and Plurality in the United Kingdom,” [online] Available from : https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ElephantintheroomFinalfinal.pdf [27 February 2023]
Media Reform Coalition, “The Elephant Next Door: A Survey of International Media Ownership Regulations,” [online] Available from : http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/The-Elephant-Next-Door.pdf [27 February 2023]
Natascha Just, “Measuring Media Concentration and Diversity: New Approaches in Europe and the USA,” in Media, Culture & Society 31, No. 1 (2009)
Ofcom, “Measurement Framework for Media Plurality: Ofcom’s Advice to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/84174/measurement_framework_for_media_plurality_statement.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “Measuring Media Plurality: Ofcom’s Advice to the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0031/57694/measuring-media-plurality.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “Measuring Media Plurality: Ofcom’s Advice to the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0031/57694/measuring-media-plurality.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “News Consumption in the UK,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/55602/annex4.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “Public Interest Test for the Proposed Acquisition of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox: Ofcom’s Report to the Secretary of State,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/103620/public-interest-test-report.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “Report on Public Interest Test on the Proposed Acquisition of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc by News Corporation,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-3/public-interest-test-nov2010 [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “The Future of Media Plurality in the UK: Ofcom’s Report to the Secretary of State on the Media Ownership Rules and Our Next Steps on Media Plurality,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/228124/statement-future-of-media-plurality.pdf [27 February 2023]
Ofcom, “The Operation of the Media Ownership Rules Listed under Section 391 of the Communications Act 2003,” [online] Available from : https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/127929/Media-ownership-rules-report-2018.pdf [27 February 2023]
Peggy Valcke and Eva Lievens, International Encyclopaedia for Media Law, Part III, ch 1, (Kluwer Law International, 2011).
Peggy Valcke, “Looking for the User in Media Pluralism Regulation,” in Journal of Information Policy 1, (2011): 287.
Petros Iosifidis, “Pluralism and Concentration of Media Ownership: Measurement Issues,” Javnost 17, no.3 (2010): 15.
Philip M Napoli and Nancy Gillis, “Media Ownership and Diversity Assessment,” in Media Ownership: Research and Regulation, ed. Ronald E Rice, (Hampton Press, 2008)
Philip M Napoli and Nancy Gillis, “Media Ownership and the Diversity Index: Outlining a Social Science Research Agenda,” McGannon Center Working Paper Series, Paper 5, (2008)
Rachael Craufurd Smith and Damian Tambini, “Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges,” in Journal of Media Law 4, no.1 (2012): 35.
Rachael Craufurd Smith et.al., “Regulating Media Plurality and Media Power in the 21st Century,” in LSE Media Policy Project: Media Policy Brief 7, (2012)
Rachael Craufurd Smith, “Is the UK ‘Media Plurality Test’ Fit For Purpose,” [online] Available from : https://cfom.org.uk/2011/07/15/is-the-uk-media-plurality-test-fit-for-purpose/ [27 February 2023]
Rachael Craufurd Smith, “Rethinking European Union Competence in the Field of Media Ownership,” in European Law Review 29, no.5 (2004): 652.
Section 58 (2A) - (2B) of Enterprise Act 2002
Section 58 (2C) of Enterprise Act 2002
Sections 58(2A) - (2C) of Enterprise Act 2002, The existing media public interest grounds for referral under section 58 of the Enterprise Act 2002
Sinclair Broadcasting Group Inc v FCC, 284 F 3d 148 (DC Cir 2002)
Tele 1 Privatfernsehgesellschaft MBH v. Austria (2002) 34 E.H.R.R. 181.
Teresa La Porte et al., “Globalization and Pluralism,” in The International Communication Gazette 69, no.4 (2007): 377.
Thomas Gibbons, Regulating the Media (Sweet & Maxwell, 1998)
Vaira Vīķe‐Freiberga et al., “A Free and Pluralistic Media to Sustain European Democracy,” in Report of the High Level Group on Media Freedom and Pluralism, 2013
