Limitations on Using Fair Use Defenses in User-Derived Content and Proposals for Copyright Law Amendment

Main Article Content

Ponkarun Lertthanapanit

Abstract

Due to the internet and rapid technological development, internet users and individuals create their own contents, especially contents which derive from other’s copyrighted materials called user-derived content (“UDC”), and upload them on internet. In creating UDC, the creators usually use copyright materials without copyright owner’s authorization which can be considered as copyright infringement. Despite the large number of UDC, the exceptions of copyright infringement, which are stipulated in Copyright Act B.E. 2537 (1994) (Copyright Act), cannot be used to protect most of UDC creators from copyright infringement. Thus, the research for law amendment should be conducted to find appropriate measures to protect UDC creators.


The exceptions of copyright infringement in Copyright law of the United States, Canada, and South Korea are selected to be studied. It is found that the United States and South Korea have general exceptions of copyright infringement, which can be claimed to protect each UDC creators in the case of which the usage of copyrighted materials is fair use. On the other hand, it is found that Canada has a specific exception of copyright infringement for user-generated content (“UGC”), which can protect UDC creators from copyright infringement if they comply with the conditions set in law.


Therefore, this article proposes that Thailand should amend provisions relating to the exception of copyright infringement in Copyright Act for protecting UDC creators by using Canada's exception of copyright infringement as a model. Furthermore, Thailand should amend Article 32 of Copyright Act to be the general exception of copyright infringement by using the United States and South Korea exception of copyright infringement as a model. These proposed amendments would promote creator’s creative ideas to achieve the objectives of copyright law and support rapid technological advancement.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

U.S. Code § 107. “Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (598 U.S. ___, 2023)

Article 29 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)

Article 29.1 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)

Article 29.21 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)

Article 35-5 of Copyright Act “(Fair Use of Works)

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)

CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC

Christian Handke and Paul Stepan Ruth towse, “The Economics of Copyright Law: A Stocktake of the Literature”, in Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5 (2008): 2.

Dan Hagen, “Fair Use, Fair Play: Video Game Performances and “Let's Plays” as Transformative Use”, in Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, 13, 3 (2018): 270-271.

Daniel J. Gervais, “The Tangled Web of Ugc: Making Copyright Sense of User-Generated Content”, in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11 (2009): 858-860.

House of Representatives, “Copyright Law Revision,” [online] Available from : https://www.copyright.gov/history/law/clrev_94-1476.pdf [10 May 2023]

Jacqueline D. Lipton, “Copyright and the Commercialization of Fanfiction”, in Houston Law Review, 52, 2 (2014): 459.

Jee Young Hahn and Byoung Kyu Lee, “Brave New World: Issues and Implications of the New Fair Use Clause in the Korean Copyright Act”, in Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 63 (2016): 545.

Julian and Christi Favor Lamont, “Distributive Justice,” [online] Available from : https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/#Scope [10 May 2023]

Khaneungnit Khaosaeng. Online Re-Creation Culture in the 21st Century: The Reconciliation between Copyright Holders, Online Re-Creators and the Public Interest. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of London, 2016)

Lee W. Lockridge, “The Myth of Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine as a Protector of Free Speech”, in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 24, 1 (2007): 35-36.

Mariam Awan, “The User-Generated Content Exception: Moving Away from a Non-Commercial Requirement”, in Canadian Intellectual Property Review, 32 (2016): 17.

Megan Marrs, “Ugc 101: A Guide to User-Generated Content Marketing,” [online] Available from : https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/28/user-generated-content [10 October 2021]

Michael Geist, The Copyright Pentalogy How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law, (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)

Michael McGregor, “Sports, Gifs and Copyright: Is It a Draw between Content Owners and Consumers in the Web 2.0 Era?”, in UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 23 (2016): 17.

Murray Stassen, “75% of Tiktok’s Users Say They Discover New Artists on the Platform,” [online] Available from : https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/tiktok-has-over-800m-active-users-worldwide-75-of-them-say-they-discover-new-artists-on-the-platform/ [26 June 2023]

OECD, Participative Web and User-Created Content Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking, (Paris OECD Publications, 2007)

P. Rinchakorn, “แนวความคิดทางเศรษฐศาสตร์ของสำนักคลาสิค : อดัม สมิท (Adam Smith)” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/468355 [10 พฤษภาคม 2566]

Rachel Morgan, “Conventional Protections for Commercial Fan Art under the U.S. Copyright Act”, in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law, 31 (2021): 570.

Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992)

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)

Starfish Academy, “เรื่องต้องรู้ ก่อน Cover เพลงลงยูทูป” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.starfishlabz.com/blog/542-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%89-%E0%B8%81%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99-cover-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%9B [12 มีนาคม 2565]

Suh, Jinho, “Ucc (User-Created Contents) and Fair Use in Korea - in Light of “Son Dam-Bi” Decision”, in Seoul Law Journal, 53, 3 (2012): 752.

U.S. Copyright Office, “U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index,” [online] Available from : https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/#:~:text=Section%20107%20of%20the%20Copyright,may%20qualify%20as%20fair%20use. [19 January 2023]

คำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 1908/2546

จุลพล ภิญโญสินวัฒน์ และ ภูมินทร์ บุตรอินทร์, ประวัติศาสตร์และแนวคิดเกี่ยวกับทรัพย์สินทางปัญญา, (กรุงเทพมหานคร: โครงการตำราและเอกสารประกอบการสอน คณะนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2559)

พุธิตา แย้มจินดา, “เมื่อผู้ใช้กลายเป็นผู้สร้าง โมเดล User-Generated Content” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.prachachat.net/columns/news-612000 [12 มีนาคม 2565]

มาตรา 15 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537

มาตรา 27 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537

มาตรา 32 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537

มาตรา 33 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537