Limitations on Using Fair Use Defenses in User-Derived Content and Proposals for Copyright Law Amendment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to the internet and rapid technological development, internet users and individuals create their own contents, especially contents which derive from other’s copyrighted materials called user-derived content (“UDC”), and upload them on internet. In creating UDC, the creators usually use copyright materials without copyright owner’s authorization which can be considered as copyright infringement. Despite the large number of UDC, the exceptions of copyright infringement, which are stipulated in Copyright Act B.E. 2537 (1994) (Copyright Act), cannot be used to protect most of UDC creators from copyright infringement. Thus, the research for law amendment should be conducted to find appropriate measures to protect UDC creators.
The exceptions of copyright infringement in Copyright law of the United States, Canada, and South Korea are selected to be studied. It is found that the United States and South Korea have general exceptions of copyright infringement, which can be claimed to protect each UDC creators in the case of which the usage of copyrighted materials is fair use. On the other hand, it is found that Canada has a specific exception of copyright infringement for user-generated content (“UGC”), which can protect UDC creators from copyright infringement if they comply with the conditions set in law.
Therefore, this article proposes that Thailand should amend provisions relating to the exception of copyright infringement in Copyright Act for protecting UDC creators by using Canada's exception of copyright infringement as a model. Furthermore, Thailand should amend Article 32 of Copyright Act to be the general exception of copyright infringement by using the United States and South Korea exception of copyright infringement as a model. These proposed amendments would promote creator’s creative ideas to achieve the objectives of copyright law and support rapid technological advancement.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
U.S. Code § 107. “Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (598 U.S. ___, 2023)
Article 29 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)
Article 29.1 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)
Article 29.21 of Copyright Act (R.S.c., 1985 c. C-42)
Article 35-5 of Copyright Act “(Fair Use of Works)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC
Christian Handke and Paul Stepan Ruth towse, “The Economics of Copyright Law: A Stocktake of the Literature”, in Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5 (2008): 2.
Dan Hagen, “Fair Use, Fair Play: Video Game Performances and “Let's Plays” as Transformative Use”, in Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, 13, 3 (2018): 270-271.
Daniel J. Gervais, “The Tangled Web of Ugc: Making Copyright Sense of User-Generated Content”, in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11 (2009): 858-860.
House of Representatives, “Copyright Law Revision,” [online] Available from : https://www.copyright.gov/history/law/clrev_94-1476.pdf [10 May 2023]
Jacqueline D. Lipton, “Copyright and the Commercialization of Fanfiction”, in Houston Law Review, 52, 2 (2014): 459.
Jee Young Hahn and Byoung Kyu Lee, “Brave New World: Issues and Implications of the New Fair Use Clause in the Korean Copyright Act”, in Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 63 (2016): 545.
Julian and Christi Favor Lamont, “Distributive Justice,” [online] Available from : https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/#Scope [10 May 2023]
Khaneungnit Khaosaeng. Online Re-Creation Culture in the 21st Century: The Reconciliation between Copyright Holders, Online Re-Creators and the Public Interest. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of London, 2016)
Lee W. Lockridge, “The Myth of Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine as a Protector of Free Speech”, in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 24, 1 (2007): 35-36.
Mariam Awan, “The User-Generated Content Exception: Moving Away from a Non-Commercial Requirement”, in Canadian Intellectual Property Review, 32 (2016): 17.
Megan Marrs, “Ugc 101: A Guide to User-Generated Content Marketing,” [online] Available from : https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/28/user-generated-content [10 October 2021]
Michael Geist, The Copyright Pentalogy How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law, (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)
Michael McGregor, “Sports, Gifs and Copyright: Is It a Draw between Content Owners and Consumers in the Web 2.0 Era?”, in UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 23 (2016): 17.
Murray Stassen, “75% of Tiktok’s Users Say They Discover New Artists on the Platform,” [online] Available from : https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/tiktok-has-over-800m-active-users-worldwide-75-of-them-say-they-discover-new-artists-on-the-platform/ [26 June 2023]
OECD, Participative Web and User-Created Content Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking, (Paris OECD Publications, 2007)
P. Rinchakorn, “แนวความคิดทางเศรษฐศาสตร์ของสำนักคลาสิค : อดัม สมิท (Adam Smith)” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/468355 [10 พฤษภาคม 2566]
Rachel Morgan, “Conventional Protections for Commercial Fan Art under the U.S. Copyright Act”, in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law, 31 (2021): 570.
Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992)
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
Starfish Academy, “เรื่องต้องรู้ ก่อน Cover เพลงลงยูทูป” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.starfishlabz.com/blog/542-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%89-%E0%B8%81%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99-cover-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%9B [12 มีนาคม 2565]
Suh, Jinho, “Ucc (User-Created Contents) and Fair Use in Korea - in Light of “Son Dam-Bi” Decision”, in Seoul Law Journal, 53, 3 (2012): 752.
U.S. Copyright Office, “U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index,” [online] Available from : https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/#:~:text=Section%20107%20of%20the%20Copyright,may%20qualify%20as%20fair%20use. [19 January 2023]
คำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 1908/2546
จุลพล ภิญโญสินวัฒน์ และ ภูมินทร์ บุตรอินทร์, ประวัติศาสตร์และแนวคิดเกี่ยวกับทรัพย์สินทางปัญญา, (กรุงเทพมหานคร: โครงการตำราและเอกสารประกอบการสอน คณะนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2559)
พุธิตา แย้มจินดา, “เมื่อผู้ใช้กลายเป็นผู้สร้าง โมเดล User-Generated Content” [ออนไลน์] แหล่งที่มา : https://www.prachachat.net/columns/news-612000 [12 มีนาคม 2565]
มาตรา 15 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537
มาตรา 27 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537
มาตรา 32 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537
มาตรา 33 พระราชบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์ พ.ศ. 2537