Galactic Governance: The Role of Arbitration in Space Law and Space-Related Disputes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Space law, an exciting and evolving area of international law, faces unique challenges with the rapid growth of private space activities, including satellite operations, space mining, and space tourism. Historically, space law was shaped by diplomatic and political interactions among states, leading to disputes being resolved through negotiations rather than formal legal mechanisms. However, the increasing involvement of private entities in space activities has shifted the focus toward arbitration as a means of dispute resolution. This article examines the role of arbitration in space-related disputes, highlighting its importance in a legal landscape where traditional methods may no longer suffice.
The discussion begins with an overview of the historical development of space law, including key international treaties such as the Outer Space Treaty, the Liability Convention, and the Moon Treaty. The article then explores the complexities of arbitration in space law, focusing on issues like liability, jurisdiction, enforcement, and confidentiality. Furthermore, it addresses how current arbitration frameworks, such as the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Optional Rules for disputes related to outer space, might be adapted to meet the demands of the private commercialization of space. The article concludes by discussing potential future approaches, including the establishment of specialized arbitration bodies, to create a more effective dispute resolution framework for the rapidly changing domain of outer space. This research aims to provide insight into whether existing legal mechanisms are sufficient or if a new, unified framework is necessary to address the emerging challenges in space governance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright in this website and the material on this website (including without limitation the text, computer code, artwork, photographs, images, music, audio material, video material and audio-visual material on this website) is owned by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal and its licensors.
1. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal grants to you a worldwide non-exclusive royalty-free revocable license to:
- view this website and the material on this website on a computer or mobile device via a web browser;
- copy and store this website and the material on this website in your web browser cache memory; and
- print pages from this website for your use.
- All articles published by Chulalongkorn University Law Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
2. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Chulalongkorn University Law Journal prior written permission.
3. You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
4. Chulalongkorn University Law Journal takes the protection of its copyright very seriously. If Chulalongkorn University Law Journal discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, Chulalongkorn University Law Journal may bring legal proceedings against you seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of Chulalongkorn University Law Journal's copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above or any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to journal@law.chula.ac.th.
References
หนังสือภาษาต่างประเทศ
Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter. Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
Conny Peck and Roy S. Lee, eds. Increasing the Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice: Proceedings of the ICJ/UNITAR Colloquium to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Court. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.
Ernst Fasan. Weltraumrecht. Mainz: Krausskopf-Flugwelt-Verlag, 1965.
Francis Lyall and Paul B. Larsen. Space Law: A Treatise. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2018.
Gabriela Catalano Sgrosso. International Space Law. Florence: Logisma Editore, 2011.
Geraldine Goh. Dispute Settlement in International Space Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007.
Knut Ipsen, ed. Völkerrecht. 7th ed. München: C. H. Beck, 2018.
Marcus Schladebach. Weltraumrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.
Nandasiri Jasentuliyana. International Space Law and the United Nations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
Ram Jakhu and Joseph Pelton. Space Safety Regulations and Standards. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017.
Sarah Cole, Craig McEwen, and Nancy Rogers. Mediation: Law, Policy, Practice. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2001.
Walter Sullivan. Angriff auf das Unbekannte: Das internationale geophysikalische Jahr. Frankfurt am Main: Büchergilde Gutenberg, 1962.
Wolfgang von Kries, Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd, and Kai-Uwe Schrogl. Grundzüge des Raumfahrtrechts. München: C. H. Beck, 2002.
บทในหนังสือภาษาต่างประเทศ
Rossana Deplano. “The Peaceful Settlement of Space Disputes: Prospects and Challenges.” The Changing Character of International Dispute Settlement, eds. Russell Buchan, Daniel Franchini, and Nicholas Tsagourias. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Rüdiger Wolfrum. “Hohe See und Tiefseeboden (Gebiet).” Handbuch des Seerechts, ed. Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum. München: C. H. Beck, 2006.
Tanja Masson-Zwaan. “Liability and Insurance for Suborbital Flights.” A Safer Space for a Safer World, ed. Lodewijk Ouwehand, ESA Special Publication 699. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: European Space Agency, January 2012.
บทความในวารสารภาษาต่างประเทศ
Andrea K. Bjorklund. “The Emerging Civilization of Investment Arbitration.” Dickinson Law Review 113, no. 4 (2009): 1269-1300.
Fausto Pocar. “An Introduction to the PCA’s Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities.” Journal of Space Law 38 (2012): 171-210.
Frank E. A. Sander. “National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with Administration of Justice.” Federal Rules Decisions 70 (1976): 79.
George Khoukaz. “ADR That Is Out of This World: A Regime for the Resolution of Outer-Space Disputes.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2018, no. 1 (2018): 265-280.
Gladys Kessler and Linda J. Finkelstein. “The Evolution of a Multi-Door Courthouse.” Catholic University Law Review 37, no. 3 (1988): 577-590.
Jan Frohloff. “Arbitration in Space Disputes.” Arbitration International 35, no. 3 (2019): 309–329.
Lotta Viikari. “Towards More Effective Settlement of Disputes in the Space Sector.” Lapland Law Review 1, no. 1 (2011): 226-251.
Magdalena Bas. “Back to Sovereignty? Policy Space in Investor-State Dispute Settlement.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 65, no. 2 (2022): 1-18.
Marcus Schladebach. “Schwerpunktbereich – Einführung in das Weltraumrecht.” Juristische Schulung no. 3 (2008): 217-222.
Rachael O’Grady. “Star Wars: The Launch of Extranational Arbitration?.” CIArb Arbitration Journal 82, no. 4 (2016): 3.
Ricky Lee. “Article II of the Outer Space Treaty: Prohibition of State Sovereignty, Private Property Rights, or Both?.” Australian Journal of International Law 11 (2004): 128-142.
Stephan Hobe. “Space Traffic Management – Some Conceptual Ideas.” Zeitschrift für Luft- und Weltraumrecht (ZLW) 65, no. 1 (2016): 3-21.
Stephen Gent. “The Politics of International Arbitration and Adjudication.” Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2, no. 1 (2013): 66-77.
Ylli Dautaj. “Enforcing Arbitral Awards Against States and the Defense of Sovereign Immunity from Execution: A U.S. Perspective.” Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 11, no. 2 (2023): 97-141.
ออนไลน์ภาษาต่างประเทศ
Ben Love and Sagar Gupta. “Investor-State Space Arbitration Rules.” accessed 15 September 2024. https://space-arbitration.com/investor-state-space-arbitration-rules/.
DIFC Courts. Space Disputes Guide. 2nd ed. Dubai: Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, 2024. accessed 3 September 2024. https://www.difccourts.ae/media-centre/publications/space-disputes-guide/space-disputes-guide-edition-2.
Julia Dreosti et al. Satellites and Space: Using Arbitration to Resolve Disputes in the New Frontier. London: Clifford Chance LLP, 2023. accessed 26 August 2024. https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2023/06/satellites-and-space-using-arbitration-to-resolve-disputes-in-the-new-frontier.pdf.
Krishnadas Rajagopal. “Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal Decision to Wind Up Devas.” accessed 2 September 2024. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-upholds-tribunal-decision-to-wind-up-devas/article38281536.ece.
Marlon Meza-Salas. “Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration: Truth or Fiction?.” accessed 8 January 2025. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/09/23/confidentiality-in-international-commercial-arbitration-truth-or-fiction/.
SpaceNews Staff. “Avanti Wins Arbitration Award Against SpaceX.” accessed 26 August 2024. https://spacenews.com/avanti-wins-arbitration-award-against-spacex/.
SpaceWatch Global. “Look Up: Space Reports More Than 10,000 Active Satellites in Orbit.” accessed 26 August 2024. https://spacewatch.global/2024/06/look-up-space-reports-more-than-10000-active-satellites-in-orbit.
Xu Zhihe and Li Tingwei. “The Use of Expert Witness in Arbitration from the Perspective of SHIAC.” accessed 8 January 2025. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/04/29/the-use-of-expert-witness-in-arbitration-from-the-perspective-of-shiac/.
กฎหมายภาษาต่างประเทศ
Agreement Relating to the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization, Article XVI, 1971.
Antarctic Treaty of 1.12.1959, 402 UNTS 71; BGBl. 1978 II S. 1517, United Nations, 1959.
Avanti Communications Group vs. Space Exploration Technologies.
BGBl. 1976 II, 1861, United Nations, 1967.
Constitution of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Art. 56, International Telecommunication Union, 1992.
Convention for the Establishment of a European Space Research Organisation, Article XVII, European Space Agency, 1962.
EUTELSAT Amended Convention, Annex B, European Telecommunications Satellite Organization, 2002.
General clauses and conditions of the European Space Agency, especially clause 35(2).
Outer Space Treaty 1297 UNTS 161, 187.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA Case No. 2022-34, Claimant’s Statement of Claim, 8.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA Case No. 2022-34, Claimant’s Statement of Claim, 2.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA Case No. 2022-34, Claimant’s Statement of Claim, 1.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA Case No. 2022-34, Claimant’s Statement of Claim, 122.
Space Communication Ltd. v. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
Space Station Agreement Between the United States of America and Other Governments, Art. 23.
United Nations General Assembly, Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, UNGA Res. 34/68, 1979.
United Nations General Assembly, Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts, and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, UNGA Res. 2345 (XXII), 1967.
United Nations General Assembly, Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, UNGA Res. 2777 (XXVI), 1971.
United Nations General Assembly, Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, UNGA Res. 3235 (XXIX), 1974.
United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 1348 (XIII), 1958.
United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 1962 (XVIII), December 13, 1963.
United Nations General Assembly, Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, UNGA Res. 2222 (XXI), 1966.
United Nations, Proceedings of the Workshop on Space Law in the Twenty-First Century, UNISPACE Technical Forum, July 1999, 193.
United Nations, Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, Article V Abs. 1 S. 2. 1967.
United Nations, Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, Article V Abs. 2. 1967.
United States Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, Public Law No. 114–90, 129 Stat. 704, November 25, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2015.
