Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence Based on Different Inequality Measures

  • Noor Ahmed Khoso Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan
  • Sheraz Rajput Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan
  • Tariq Aziz Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan
  • Akseer Hussain Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan
  • Agha Jahanzeb Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Pakistan
Keywords: income inequality, trade openness, Gini coefficient, two-step GMM

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical literature on the impact of trade openness on income inequality is inconclusive. The inconsistent findings may be partly the result of biased measures of income inequality and divergent data sources. This paper improves upon the previous literature by examining the impact of trade openness on income inequality, using data from three major data sources: the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID), including disposable and market income; World Development Indicators (WDI); and the University of Texas Inequality Project (UTIP); as well as four Gini coefficients as measures of inequality. We apply a two-step system GMM estimation technique and the findings suggest a negative relationship between trade openness and income inequality. Based on the empirical results, we conclude that changing the measure of inequality from different data sources does not affect the empirical results related to the trade-inequality relationship.

References

Acar, S., & Dogruel, F. (2012). Sources of inequality in selected MENA countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(3), 276-285.

Asteriou, D., Dimelis, S., & Moudatsou, A. (2014). Globalization and income inequality: A panel data econometric approach for the EU27 countries. Economic Modelling, 36, 592-599.

Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32.

Barro, R. J. (2008). Inequality and growth revisited (ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 11). Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488-505.

Bond, S. R., Hoeffler, A., & Temple, J. R. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models (Economics Papers 2001-W21). Oxford: Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 565-591.

Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (1996). Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality. American Economic Review, 86(2), 240-245.

Galbraith, J. K., Choi, J., Halbach, B., Malinowska, A., & Zhang, W. (2016). A comparison of major world inequality data sets: LIS, OECD, EU-SILC, WDI, and EHII. In L. Cappellari, S. W. Polachek, & K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Income Inequality Around the World (pp. 1-48). West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Harrison, A., McLaren, J., & McMillan, M. S. (2010). Recent findings on trade and inequality (NBER Working Paper No. w16425). Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Heimberger, P. (2020). Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta-analysis. The World Economy, 43(11), 2960-2982.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.

Jaumotte, F., Lall, S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271-309.

Knutsen, C. H. (2015). Reinvestigating the reciprocal relationship between democracy and income inequality. Review of Economics and Institutions, 6(2), 1-37.

Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2009). International economics: Theory and policy. London: Pearson.

Labra, R., & Torrecillas, C. (2018). Estimating dynamic Panel data. A practical approach to perform long panels. Revista Colombiana de Estadística, 41(1), 31-52.

Lin, F., & Fu, D. (2016). Trade, institution quality and income inequality. World Development, 77, 129-142.

Lundberg, M., & Squire, L. (2003). The simultaneous evolution of growth and inequality. The Economic Journal, 113(487), 326-344.

O'Rourke, K. H. (2002). Globalization and inequality: Historical trends. Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, 57(1), 65-104.

Ravallion, M. (2018). Inequality and globalization: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(2), 620-42.

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.

Smeeding, T., & Latner, J. P. (2015). PovcalNet, WDI and ‘All the Ginis’: a critical review. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13(4), 603-628.

Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281.

Spilimbergo, A., Londoño, J. L., & Székely, M. (1999). Income distribution, factor endowments, and trade openness. Journal of Development Economics, 59(1), 77-101.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic development. London: Pearson.

Zhou, L., Biswas, B., Bowles, T., & Saunders, P. J. (2011). Impact of globalization on income distribution inequality in 60 countries. Global Economy Journal, 11(1), 1850216.

Published
2021-07-31
How to Cite
Khoso, N. A., Rajput, S., Aziz, T., Hussain, A., & Jahanzeb, A. (2021). Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence Based on Different Inequality Measures. Applied Economics Journal, 28(2), 63-81. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AEJ/article/view/245051
Issue
Vol. 28 No. 2 (2021): December
Section
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2021 Applied Economics Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript to Applied Economics Journal will be taken to imply that the author(s) guarantee that the paper is an original work, has not been published, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere either in printed or electronic form. The author(s) have obtained permission from the copyright holder to reproduce in the article material not owned by them, that author(s) have acknowledged the source, and that this article contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of an obscene, indecent, libelous or otherwise unlawful nature and that the article does not infringe the rights of others. The author(s) will indemnify and keep indemnified the editors and Applied Economics Journal, Center for Applied Economics Research (CAER), Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University against all claims and expenses. The author(s) agree that the publisher may arrange for the article to be published and sold or distributed on its own, or with other related materials, and could reproduce and/or distribute in printed, electronic or any other medium whether now known or hereafter devised, in all languages, and to authorize third parties to do the same.