Institutional Quality and Unemployment in OECD Nations: A Panel Causality Test Using a Fourier Function
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A significant impact of institutional quality on sustainable growth has been revealed in recent studies. This study aims to examine the relationship between different institutions and their unemployment rates, considering the legal system and property rights index. A novel and robust panel Fourier causality test was conducted to investigate 38 OECD nations for the relationship between their institutional quality and unemployment rates between the years 2000 and 2018. Regardless of stationarity, the adopted method allowed for the endogenous identification of structures, locations, and forms, and the evaluation of causal relationships. In addition, the Fourier method and the trigonometric terms were used for analyzing the structural changes. According to the findings, a unidirectional causal relationship existed between the quality of the legal system and property rights and the unemployment rates in the investigated nations during the relevant period. In addition, bidirectional causality existed between the variables in Germany and the United States. It is therefore recommended to necessarily improve a nation’s institutional structure to reduce its unemployment rate. Low unemployment rates would be achieved by improving institutional quality, particularly in developing nations. Therefore, policymakers must focus on formulating policies to reduce unemployment in the long run, considering the legal system and property rights of the nation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The paper is published under CC BY-NC-ND, in which the article is freely downloaded and shared in its original form non-commercially and its citation details are identified.
References
Acemoglu, D. (2003). Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 620–652.
Acemoglu, D., Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 1043-1171.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. & Thaicharoen, Y. (2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: Volatility, crises and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 49–123.
Acemoglu, D. & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949–995.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 385–472.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The role of institutions in growth and development (Commission on Growth and Development Working Papers No.10). Retrieved from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/232971468326415075/pdf/577100NWP0Box31UBLIC10gc1wp10101web.pdf
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Acemoglu, D. & Shimer, R. (1999). Efficiency wages and the wage structure. The RAND Journal of Economics, 30(3), 366–395.
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Avdagic, S. & Salardi, P. (2013). Tenuous link: Labour market institutions and unemployment in advanced and new market economies. Socio-Economic Review, 11(4), 739–769.
Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). Employment patterns in OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 486). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/employment-patterns-in-oecd-countries_702031136412
Belot, M., & Van Ours, J. C. (2001). Unemployment and labor market institutions: An empirical analysis. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 15(4), 403–418.
Belot, M., & Van Ours, J. C. (2004). Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labor market reforms? Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 621–642.
Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(462), C1-C33.
Botero, J. C., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.
Deakin, S., Malmberg, J., & Sarkar, P. (2014). How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970–2010. International Labour Review, 153(1), 1-27.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.
Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.
Ederveen, S., & Thissen, L. (2007). Can labour market Institutions explain high unemployment rates in the new EU Member States? Empirica, 34(4), 299–317.
Eichhorst, W., Escudero, V., Marx, P., & Tobin, S. (2010). The impact of the crisis on employment and the role of labour market institutions (IZA Discussion Papers No. 5320). Retrieved from: https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/5320/the-impact-of-the-crisis-on-employment-and-the-role-of-labour-market-institutions
Emirmahmutoglu, F., & Kose, N. (2011). Testing for granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 870–876.
Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Reljic, J. (2022). Labour market policies for inclusiveness: A literature review with a gap analysis (ILO Working Paper No.78). Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/working-papers/WCMS_855080/lang--en/index.htm
Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.
Freeman, R. B. (2005). Labour market institutions without blinders: The debate over flexibility and labour market performance. International Economic Journal, 19(2), 129–145.
Freeman, R. B. (2008). Labor market institutions around the world (CEP Discussion Paper, No 844). Retrieved from https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0844.pdf
Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271–303.
Griffith, R., Harrison, R., & Macartney, G. (2007). Product market reforms, labour market institutions and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 117(519), C142-C166.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights and economic development. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 32(3), 471–506.
Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N. A., & Soytas, U. (2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168–175.
Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55–74.
Nickell, S. (2003). Labour market institutions and unemployment in OECD countries. CESifo DICE Report, 1(2), 13–26.
Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 3029–3084.
Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., Ochel, W., & Quintini, G. (2003). The Beveridge curve, unemployment and wages in the OECD from the 1960s to the 1990s. In P. Aghion (Ed.), Knowledge, information, and expectations in modern macroeconomics: In honor of Edmund S. Phelps (pp. 357–393). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Okun, A. (1962). Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 98–104.
Peng, F., Anwar, S., & Kang, L. (2017). New technology and old institutions: An empirical analysis of the skill-biased demand for older workers in Europe. Economic Modelling, 64, 1-19.
Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4), 385–412.
Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies In Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3–31.
Stockhammer, E., & Klär, E. (2011). Capital accumulation, labour market institutions and unemployment in the medium run. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 437–457.
Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.
Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a fourier function. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40552–40562.