An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment and Unemployment Rate in Azerbaijan: An ARDL approach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the effect of FDI on the unemployment rate in Azerbaijan from 1993 to 2022. The Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) unit root test, Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root test, ARDL co-integration test, and Granger Causality test have been employed for the statistical analysis. The results of the ARDL approach indicated a significant relationship between FDI and the unemployment rate. The outcomes of the long-run analysis noted a negative and significant relationship between FDI and unemployment. In contrast, the short-run test showed a negative but insignificant relationship between FDI and unemployment. Moreover, the findings of the Granger causality test showed no causal link running from FDI to unemployment, meaning the null hypothesis that FDI does not Granger cause unemployment should be accepted. This suggests that FDI leads to employment in Azerbaijan. Conversely, a causal relationship running from unemployment to FDI was confirmed, indicating that the null hypothesis that unemployment does not Granger cause FDI should be rejected, and the alternative hypothesis that unemployment does Granger cause FDI must be accepted. This implies that the unemployment rate influences FDI inflow into the country. Hence, it has been demonstrated that FDI inflows decreased Azerbaijan's unemployment rate during the examined period.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The paper is published under CC BY-NC-ND, in which the article is freely downloaded and shared in its original form non-commercially and its citation details are identified.
References
Baldwin, R. E. (1995). The effects of trade and foreign direct investment on employment and relative wages (NBER Working Paper No.5037). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bayar, Y. (2017). Greenfield and brownfield investments and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Union countries. Naše Gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 63(3), 19–26.
Belkania, D., & Karimov, M. (2018). An empirical examination of the export-led growth theory regarding Georgia. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 1(3), 88-96.
Blanchard, O. J., & Summers, L. H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15–78.
Bose, T. K. (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of FDI in China and India. International Business Research, 5(5), 164-174.
Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for time series regressions with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
Driffield, N., & Taylor, K. (2000). FDI and the labour market: A review of the evidence and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3), 90–103.
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
Gökçeli, E. (2023). Effect of aggregate FDI and sectoral FDI on the unemployment rate: Evidence from Türkiye. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 27–42.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
Hakim, D. R., Ahman, E., & Kusnendi, K. (2023). The effect of FDI on the host countries’ employment: A meta-regression analysis. Russian Journal of Economics, 9(2), 158–182.
Howitt, P. (2010). Endogenous growth theory. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), Economic Growth (pp. 68–73). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
Karimov, M. (2020a). An empirical analysis of the relationship among foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, CO2 emissions, renewable energy contribution in the context of the Environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypothesis regarding Turkey. European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering, 3(2), 23–42.
Karimov, M. (2020b). The impact of foreign direct investment on trade (export and import) in Turkey. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1–17.
Karimov, M., & Belkania, D. (2018). A case study of foreign direct investment and economic growth relationship in Turkey. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 1(3), 97-101.
Karimov, M., & Huseynova, E. (2024). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Türkiye: ARDL approach. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 24(1), 29-42.
Karimov, M. I., Nesirov, E. V., & Zeynalli, E. C. (2023). The examination of the relationship between foreign direct investment and trade in Turkey: ARDL approach. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis, Arad–Economics Series Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldiş, Arad - Seria Ştiinţe Economice, 33(4), 117–144.
Karimov, M., Paradi-Dolgos, A., & Koroseczne Pavlin, R. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between foreign direct investment and unemployment rate: Evidence from Turkey. European Research Studies Journal, XXIII(1), 453-464.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of interest, employment and money. London: MacMillan.
Lipsey, R. E. (2004). Home-and host-country effects of foreign direct investment. In R. E. Baldwin & L. A. Winters (Eds.), Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics (pp. 333-382). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Maček, A., & Ovin, R. (2014). Does economic interventionism help strategic industries?: Evidence from Europe. Retrieved from https://otik.uk.zcu.cz/handle/11025/17564
Moosa, I. A. (2002). Foreign direct investment: Theory, evidence and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moran, T. H. (2001). Parental supervision: The new paradigm for foreign direct investment and development. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis (DAE Working Paper Series No. 9514). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. P. (1998). Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(5), 471–505.
Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
Sabado, J. R. F., Millan, K. A., & Asoy, D. M. (2023). The relationship of foreign direct investment and unemployment rate in the Philippines. Journal of Asian Development, 9(1), 32–52.
Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599–607.
Strat, V. A., Davidescu, A., & Paul, A. M. (2015). FDI and the unemployment-a causality analysis for the latest EU members. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 635–643.
Tanaya, O., & Suyanto, S. (2023). Investigating the role of foreign direct investment on youth unemployment rate in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 14(2), 121–131.
Tenuche, M. (2010). Foreign direct investments, strategic assets and sustainable development: A critique of international investment in Nigeria’s steel sector. Journal of Politics and Laws, 3(2), 139-147.
UNCTAD. (2019). World investment report 2019. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2019_en.pdf
UNCTAD. (2020). World investment report 2020. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2020_en.pdf
U.S. Department of State Report. (2021). 2021 Investment climate statements: Azerbaijan. U.S. Department of State. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-investment-climate-statements/azerbaijan/