The Art and Science of Modern Educational Administration: Integrating Quality Networks and Leadership Spirit for Sustainable Success

Main Article Content

Sukanda Kaeobuppha

Abstract

This academic article aims to (1) examine the context, trends, and challenges of modern educational institution administration in response to the rapid changes of global society in the twenty-first century; (2) analyze and synthesize key concepts related to the science of administration, the art of leadership, educational networking, quality management systems, and spiritual leadership that are essential for contemporary school administration; and (3) propose an integrated approach that combines educational networks, quality systems, and spiritual leadership to drive schools toward sustainable success and continuous educational improvement.


The synthesis revealed that modern school administrators need to move beyond traditional administrative approaches and become leaders capable of integrating “networks–quality–values” in a balanced manner. Such leadership requires the application of administrative knowledge, leadership skills, and a strong sense of responsibility toward learners and society. The integration of these dimensions contributes to enhancing student quality, developing teacher capacity, fostering a learning-oriented organizational culture, and strengthening collaboration among stakeholders. These outcomes serve as a foundation for sustainable educational development and continuous quality improvement.


This article further proposes policy recommendations for educational authorities to promote the development of administrators in value-based leadership, educational networking, and participatory quality management. Such efforts will help establish resilient, adaptive, and high-performing educational institutions that are well prepared to respond effectively to future changes and challenges.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaeobuppha, S. . (2026). The Art and Science of Modern Educational Administration: Integrating Quality Networks and Leadership Spirit for Sustainable Success. College of Asian Scholar Journal, 16(2), 42–49. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CAS/article/view/289164
Section
Academic Article

References

ไกรยราช ปุริสาร. (2568). การสร้างมนุษยสัมพันธ์ในองค์กรทางการศึกษาในยุคดิจิทัล. วารสารวิทยาลัย บัณฑิตเอเซีย, 15(4), 1–18.

ณรงค์ วิชัยรัตน์. (2562). ภาวะผู้นำทางการศึกษาในศตวรรษที่ 21. วารสารการบริหารการศึกษา, 10(2), 1–14.

ธีระ รุญเจริญ. (2560). ภาวะผู้นำและการบริหารการศึกษา. กรุงเทพฯ: ข้าวฟ่าง.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560–2579. กรุงเทพฯ: พริกหวานกราฟฟิค.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727.

Fry, L. W., & Nisiewicz, M. (2013). Maximizing the triple bottom line through spiritual leadership. Stanford University Press.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press.rd, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Murdock, M. C. (2011). Creative leadership: Skills that drive change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: U NESCO.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.