ACCELERATING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION SUCCESS THROUGH AGILE LEADERSHIP: THE MEDIATING ROLES OF ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY AND MULTI-GENERATIONAL TEAM MANAGEMENT IN THAI BUSINESSES

Authors

  • Prokchol Ngamsiri Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Orawee Sriboonlue Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2026.286715

Keywords:

Agile leadership, Organizational agility, Multi-generational team management, Digital transformation success

Abstract

Purpose – This research aimed to examine the influence of agile leadership on digital transformation success in Thai business organizations, particularly the mediating roles of organizational agility and multi-generational team management.

Methodology – This research employed a quantitative design. Data were collected from 385 executives, supervisors, and employees across various industries in Thailand using validated survey instrument. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to assess the measurement model and test the hypothesized relationships.

Results – The structural model results indicated that agile leadership had a significant positive effect on digital transformation success (β = 0.150, p < .05), organizational agility (β = 0.746, p < .001), and multi-generational team management (β = 0.729, p < .001). Organizational agility (β = 0.324, p < .001) and multi-generational team management (β = 0.240, p < .01) also had significant positive effects on digital transformation success. Mediation analysis confirmed that both variables partially mediated the relationship between agile leadership and digital transformation success, suggesting that leadership influences digital transformation not only directly but also through organizational and managerial mechanisms. The model explained 42.4% of the variance in digital transformation success (R² = 0.424).

Implications – The research findings suggest that Thai organizations should systematically develop agile leadership capabilities while strengthening organizational agility and multi-generational team management practices. Emphasizing decentralized decision-making, adaptive structures, and inclusive management across generational differences may enhance digital transformation outcomes.

Originality/Value – This research contributes to leadership and digital transformation literature by clarifying the structural pathways through which agile leadership drives digital transformation success in the context of Thai organizations characterized by hierarchical structures and generational diversity.

References

Cochran, W. (1953). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Gurbuz, F. G., & & Hatunoglu, S. B. (2022). Assessment of organizational agility: Adaptation and validation of the scale for application in turkey. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 9(1), 27-37. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1546

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

Hartaningtyas, I., Kasali, R., Kusumastuti, R. D., Rahayu, S., & Hati, H. (2024). Continuous Organizational Agility in a Highly Regulated Industry. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(4S), 1734-1746. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2237

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hernaus, T., & Pološki Vokić, N. (2014). Work design for different generational cohorts: Determining common and idiosyncratic job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(4), 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2014-0104

Ibrahimi, G., & Benchekroun, B. (2023). The contribution of agility to an organization's digital transformation. TEM Journal, 12(4), 2361-2369. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM124-48

Kaya, Y. (2023). Agile Leadership from the Perspective of Dynamic Capabilities and Creating Value. Sustainability, 15(21), 15253. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115253

Lazar, M. A., Zbuchea, A., & Pînzaru, F. (2023). The emerging generation Z workforce in the digital world: A literature review on cooperation and transformation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 1991-2001. Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0175

Nyamboga, T. O. (2025). Strategic leadership in multigenerational workforces: Bridging generational divides for enhanced engagement. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 19(1), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i1880

Office of the National Digital Economy and Society Commission. (2026). Thailand digital outlook 2025 [Annual report]. Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. https://www.bde.go.th

Oh, K., Kho, H., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2022). Determinants for successful digital transformation. Sustainability, 14(3), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031215

Oludapo, S., Carroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2024). Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114528

Pietrantonio, F., Brunelli, G., Vassallo, G., Moriconi, L., Signorini, A., & Moriconi, A. (2025). Age diversity management in healthcare: Leveraging generational differences with an inclusive approach. Italian Journal of Medicine, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2025.2074

Porkodi, S. (2024). The effectiveness of agile leadership in practice: A comprehensive meta-analysis of empirical studies on organizational outcomes. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 20(2), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.7341/20242026

Rialti, R., & Filieri, R. (2024). Leaders, let’s get agile! Observing agile leadership in successful digital transformation projects. Business Horizons, 67(4), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.003

Říhová, L., Písař, P., & Havlíček, K. (2019). Innovation potential of cross-generational creative teams in the EU. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.21511/PPM.17(4).2019.04

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 2, 7-24.

Teece, D. J. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Weritz, P., Braojos, J., Matute, J., & Benitez, J. (2024). Impact of strategic capabilities on digital transformation success and firm performance: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(3), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2024.2311137

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Ngamsiri, P., & Sriboonlue, O. (2026). ACCELERATING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION SUCCESS THROUGH AGILE LEADERSHIP: THE MEDIATING ROLES OF ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY AND MULTI-GENERATIONAL TEAM MANAGEMENT IN THAI BUSINESSES. RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW, 10(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2026.286715

Issue

Section

Research Articles