Development of Physics Board Game Using Reflective Cycle to Enhance Upper Secondary Students’ Strategic Thinking Ability

Authors

  • Pranon Pimphan Division of Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Pornthep Chantraukrit Division of Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/ojed.2025.11

Keywords:

physics boardgame, reflective thinking, strategic thinking ability, upper secondary students

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) develop a physics board game using reflective cycle to enhance strategic thinking ability among upper secondary school students, and 2) compare students’ strategic thinking ability before and after using the board game. This research employed a research and development (R&D) methodology and was conducted in three phases: 1) Conducting in-depth interviews with physics and science teachers to identify problems and needs. The research instrument included a problem-and-needs interview form. The data were analyzed using domain-based typological analysis. 2) Designing and developing a physics board game. The research instrument included the physics board game designed to incorporate the reflective thinking cycle. 3) Implementing the board game with a cluster random sample of 40 Grade 10 students from one classroom. The research instruments included lesson plans for the unit on linear motion, strategic thinking ability test, and decision-reporting form completed during gameplay. The data were analyzed using dependent samples t-test. The research findings were as follows: 1) The physics board game using reflective cycle should possess six key characteristics: collaborative gameplay, realistic simulation, the inclusion of unexpected events, multiple decision-making options, clear rules, and age-appropriate challenge levels. 2) A comparison of students’ strategic thinking ability before and after the intervention, both in terms of behavior and statistical analysis, showed that the post-test mean score was significantly higher than the pre-test score at the .05 level of significance. Additionally, post-instruction, students demonstrated all components of strategic thinking behavior.

References

ภาษาไทย

ไซโต, วาย. (2552). Senryaku supa shinkingu purofesshonaru [คิดอย่างมีกลยุทธ์]. สมาคมส่งเสริมเทคโนโลยี (ไทย-ญี่ปุ่น).

มัลลิกา บุนนาค. (2551). สถิติเพื่อการวิจัยและตัดสินใจ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 7). ศูนย์หนังสือแห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

ศรบรม กุลลาวัณย์ และ สิรินธร สินจินดาวงศ์. (2566). การจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้เกมเป็นฐานด้วยเกมกระดาน เรื่อง การเคลื่อนที่แบบซิมเปิลฮาร์มอนิก ที่ส่งเสริมการเรียนรู้วิชาฟิสิกส์ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 5. วารสารวิชาการศึกษาศาสตร์ ศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ. 24(2), 99-114. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/jedu/article/view/15546/12737

ภาษาอังกฤษ

AlQershi, N. (2021). Strategic thinking, strategic planning, strategic innovation and the performance of SMEs: The mediating role of human capital. Management Science Letters, 11(3), 1003-1012. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.042

Cascio, J. (2020, April 30). Facing the age of chaos. Medium. https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d

Dalal, M., Carberry, A., & Archambault, L. (2021). Developing a ways of thinking framework for engineering education research. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.38

Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319-1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6

Dziob, D. (2020). Board game in physics classes—A proposal for a new method of student assessment. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9714-y

Frias, M. A. V., & Roleda, L. S. (2018). The efficacy of creative play approach in teaching modern physics. In De La Salle University (Ed.), Knowledge building towards industry 4.0. De La Salle University research congress 2019 (pp. 1-6). De La Salle University. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2019/lli-II-022.pdf

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

https://thoughtsmostlyaboutlearning.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/learning-by-doing-graham-gibbs.pdf

Hammond, K. (2017, September 28). Advantages & disadvantages of simulation games. It Still Works. https://itstillworks.com/12599408/advantages-disadvantages-of-simulation-games

Jones, C., & Papangelis, K. (2020). Reflective practice: Lessons learnt by using board games as a design tool for location-based games. In P. Kyriakidis, D. Hadjimitsis, D. Skarlatos & A. Mansourian (Eds.), Geospatial technologies for local and regional development (pp. 185-198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_16

Köster, F., Shewbridge, C., & Krämer, C. (2020). Promoting education decision makers’ use of evidence in austria. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/0ac0181e-en

Marone, V., Staples, C., & Greenberg, K. H. (2016). Learning how to learn by solving bizarre problems: a playful approach to developing creative and strategic thinking. On the Horizon, 24(1), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2015-0040

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of economic development, environment and people, 7(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Moon, J. A. (2013). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers college record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181

Ropii, N., Hardyanto, W., & Ellianawati, E. (2019). Guided inquiry scratch increase students' critical thinking skills on the linear motion concept: Can it be?. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05107

Schell, J. (2008). The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC press.

Teodorescu, P. P. (2008). Mechanical systems, classical models volume II: Mechanics of discrete and continuous systems. Springer Science & Business Media.

Warren, A., Archambault, L., & Foley, R. W. (2014). Sustainability education framework for teachers: Developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. Journal of Sustainability Education, 6(4), 23-28. http://susted.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Warren-et-al.-JSE-May-2014-With-Hyperlinks.pdf

Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Investigating the learning- theory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00437.x

Yang, J., & Kim, K. H. (2022). Effect of the strategic thinking, problem solving skills, and grit on the disaster triage ability of emergency room nurses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 1-11.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020987

Zheng, R., & Gardner, M. K. (2016). Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications. IGI Global.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Pimphan, P., & Chantraukrit, P. . (2025). Development of Physics Board Game Using Reflective Cycle to Enhance Upper Secondary Students’ Strategic Thinking Ability. An Online Journal of Education, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14456/ojed.2025.11

Issue

Section

Research Articles