Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Business Management and Sustainable Growth of Thai Listed Companies

Main Article Content

Sanisa Thanikornchot
Anurak Panyanuwat

Abstract

This study examines the context, characteristics, and performance of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) in relation to the concept of sustainable business growth based on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles, and how such performance influences investor interest. A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. The qualitative phase involved an in-depth documentary analysis and secondary data review of 17 sample companies covering the period from 2015 to 2024. The quantitative phase utilized primary data collected via questionnaires from a questionnaire survey of 54 institutional investors (25 from Asset Management Companies and 29 from Securities Brokerage Firms). The findings reveal a structural shift within Thai listed companies, where ESG adoption has transitioned from a voluntary initiative into a fundamental “License to Operate.” This evolution is largely driven by global standards and the government’s BCG (Bio-Circular-Green) policy. Companies with standout ESG performance see a direct, positive impact on their long-term corporate value, proving that ESG acts as a strategic value driver that also opens doors to lower-cost capital. When it comes to capturing investor interest, the data shows a significant gap between what is expected and what is happening (t = 14.703, p < 0.001). With an expectation gap of 0.54, investor decision-making has hit the highest level of priority. This indicates that ESG metrics have officially shifted from a "nice-to-have" alternative to an absolute baseline for investment decisions. Ultimately, this means companies must move away from simply reporting activities and start delivering clear, quantitative outcomes to truly earn investor trust.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thanikornchot, S., & Panyanuwat, A. (2026). Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Business Management and Sustainable Growth of Thai Listed Companies. Executive Journal, 46(1), 20–40. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/executivejournal/article/view/287842
Section
Research Articles

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1998). Research in education (8th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015, March). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. University of Oxford & Arabesque Partners. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841

IFRS Foundation. (2026). IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). 20 The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. In A. McWilliams, D. E. Rupp, D. S. Siegel, G. K. Stahl, & D. A. Waldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 451–489). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198802280.013.20

Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383

Manorat, S. (2020). Phonkrathop khō̜ng ESG tō̜ khwāmsamphan rawāng khunlaksana khō̜ng khanakamkān kap phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān khō̜ng Bō̜risat [The moderating effect of ESG on board characteristics and firm performance] [Independent study, Thammasat University]. ThaiLIS Digital Collection.

National Science and Technology Development Agency [NSTDA]. (2020, March 4). BCG in action: The new sustainable growth engine mō dē lō̜ sētthakit sū kānphatthanā thī yangyư̄n [BCG in action: The new sustainable growth engine economic model for sustainable development]. https://www.nstda.or.th/home/knowledge_post/bcg-in-action-new-sustainable/

Panich, R. (2022). Khwāmsamphan chœ̄ng Pol wat rawāng phontō̜pthǣn læ phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān thāngkānngœ̄n khō̜ng Bō̜risat čhotthabīan klum thurakit yangyư̄n thī thūk čhat ʻandap dān singwǣtlō̜m sangkhom læ Thorn ramāphi bān nai [The dynamic relationships between returns and financial performance of companies listed in Thailand Sustainability Investment (THSI) rated by Environment, Social and Governance]. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Association of Private Higher Education Institutions of Thailand, 28(2), 31–45. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apheit-ss/article/view/256670

Ratanawarocha, R. (2018). Phonkrathop khō̜ng kān prakāt rāi chư̄ Bō̜risat čhotthabīan thī mī kāndamnœ̄n ngān dōt Den dān singwǣtlō̜m sangkhom læ Thorn ramāphi bān titʻandap ESG nưngrō̜i tō̜ ʻakān tō̜p Sanō̜ng khō̜ng talāt læ phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān khō̜ng kitkān [The impact of Environment Social and Governance Rating (ESG100) announcement on market reaction and firm performance] [Independent study, Thammasat University]. ThaiLIS Digital Collection.

SDG Move. (n.d.). Introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). https://www.sdgmove.com/intro-to-sdgs/

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Sudcharoen, P. (2021). Kānsưksā phonkrathop khō̜ng radap khwāmrapphitchō̜p dān singwǣtlō̜m sangkhom læ bansat phi bān ( ESG ) tō̜ phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān phān khwāmsīang khō̜ng Bō̜risat čhotthabīan nai talātlaksaphǣngprathētthai ( SET) [A study on the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) responsibility levels on corporate performance through risk in listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand] [Independent study, Thammasat University]. ThaiLIS Digital Collection.

Termvanich, A. (2015). Khwāmsamphan rawāng radap khwāmrapphit chō̜p tō̜ sangkhom kap ʻattrā phontō̜pthǣn khō̜ng laksap: Kranī Sưksā Bō̜risat nai klum ESG nưngrō̜I [The relationship between ESG rating and stock returns and financial ratios of listed companies] [Independent study, Thammasat University]. ThaiLIS Digital Collection.

Thi Thu Thao, T. (2023). ESG trend: The history of ESG concept formation and the current trends in the goal of business sustainable development. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4385

Yamutai, S. (2021). Khunlaksana khō̜ng khanakamkān kap phon kāndamnœ̄n ngān dān singwǣtlō̜m sangkhom læ bansat phi bān ( ESG) [Board characteristics and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance] [Independent study, Thammasat University]. ThaiLIS Digital Collection.

Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2022). Does ESG performance effect firm value? Evidence from a new ESG-Scoring approach for Chinese enterprises. Sustainability, 14(24), 16940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416940

Zago, B. M., Araújo, L. S., Viana, D. D. S., Silva, I. R. M. D., de Barros, D. V. D., & Costa, I. D. M. (2023). Conscientização de Empresas que adotam as medidas de governanças ambientais, sociais e corporativas (ESG). Brazilian Journal of Development, 9(5), 18033-18042. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n5-236

Zavyalova, E. B., Krotova, T. G., & Buniakova, A. V. (2023). ESG impact on corporate competitiveness. Journal of Law and Administration, 19(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-2-67-62-70