Towards Deeper Judicialisation: Explaining Thailand's Increasing Engagement with International Adjudication

Phil Saengkrai

doi:10.54157/tls.246051

Authors

Phil Saengkrai Thammasat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.246051

Keywords:

International adjudication, Proliferation of international courts and tribunals, Judicialisation, Institutional conditions, Socio-professional conditions

Abstract

This paper calls attention to a little-noticed phenomenon about the Thai government’s increasing involvement in international adjudication over the last two decades. For the first time, it has participated in the advisory proceedings before the ITLOS, and made oral statements in the advisory proceedings before the ICJ. It has faced the first treaty-based arbitration by a German investor. There has also been an attempt to initiate the proceedings at the International Criminal Court against Thai officials. All of these parallel the government’s extensive participation in the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO. What accounts for such developments? The paper argues that Thailand’s constantly increasing engagement with international adjudication should be understood as part of the judicialisation of international relations. Specifically, it is shaped by four main conditions. First, the Thai government has cautiously yet constantly expanded its acceptance of jurisdiction of courts and tribunals. Second, the number of potential claimants has exponentially increased. Third, the composition of the international litigator communities has changed, resulting in the significant increase in the number of lawyers willing to pursue new cases. Fourth, Thai government officials are learning to strategically make themselves more visible in the litigator communities.

References

Alter, Karen J. “The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review.” In Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107310.018

Alter, Karen J., Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, and Laurence R. Helfer. “Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations.” (2019) 63 International Studies Quarterly 449. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz019

Alter, Karen J., Laurence R. Helfer, and Mikael Rask Madsen. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts.” In Karen J. Alter, Laurenc R. Helfer, and Mikael Rask Madsen (eds), International Court Authority (Oxford University Press 2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0002

“The Bangkok Massacres: A Call for Accountability.” Amsterdam & Peroff LLP (2010). https://amsterdamandpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Thailand-White-Paper-Final.pdf

“Bangkok Pushes WTO Multilateral System.” Bangkok Post (19 March 2019). https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/1646996/bangkok-pushes-wto-multilateral-system

Born, Gary. “A New Generation of International Adjudication.” (2012) 61(4) Duke Law Journal 775.

Churchill, Robin R., and A. Vaughan Lowe. The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press 1999).

“CIA Director Gina Haspel’s Thailand Torture Ties.” BBC (3 May 2018). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43496212

Cormier, Monique. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-States Parties (Cambridge University Press 2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108588706

Crawford, James. “The International Law Bar: Essence before Existence?” In Jean d’Aspremont et al. (eds), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press 2017) 338. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492802.015

Crawford, James, Alain Pellet, and Catherine Redgwell. “Anglo-American and Continental Traditions in Advocacy before International Courts and Tribunals.” (2013) 2 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 715. https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.02.04.128

Dezalay, Sarah, and Yyves Dezalay. “Professionals of International Justice: From the Shadow of State Diplomacy to the Pull of the Market for Commercial Arbitration.” In Jean d’Aspremont et al. (eds), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press 2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492802.014

Dezalay, Yyves, and Bryant G. Garth. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (University of Chicago Press 1996).

Eberhardt, Pia, and Cecilla Olivet. “Profiting from Injustice: How Law Firms, Arbitrators, and Financiers are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom.” Corporate Europe Observatory (2012). https://corporateeurope.org/en/international-trade/2012/11/profiting-injustice

Gerth, Hans H., and Charles Wright Mills. “Introduction.” In Hans H. Gerth and Charles Wright Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford University Press 1946).

Gill, Terry D. Litigation Strategy at the International Court: A Case Study of the Nicaragua vs. the United States Dispute (Brill 1989). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004634558

Goldstein, Judith et al. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” (2000) 54 International Organization 385. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551262

Haberkorn, Tyrell. In Plain Sight: Impunity and Human Rights in Thailand (The University of Wisconsin Press 2019).

Highet, Keith. “A Personal Memoir of Eduardo Jiménez de Aréchaga: Doyen of the Invisible Bar of the International Court of Justice.” (1994) 88 Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 577.

“Interim Appeal Arrangement for WTO Disputes Becomes Effective.” European Commission (30 April 2020). https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=2143

“International Investment Agreements Navigator.” UNCTAD. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-greements/countries/207/thailand

Jaturon Thirawat. “To Join or Not to Join the International Criminal Court: The Thai Dilemma.” (2005) 1 Asia Pacific Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 168.

Jennings, Robert. “The Work of the International Law Bar.” In Lal C. Vohrah et al. (eds), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 443. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004479098_027

“Judge Kriangsak Kittichaisaree.” ITLOS. https://www.itlos.org/the-tribunal/members/judge-kriangsak-kittichaisaree/

Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne Marie Slaughter. “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational.” (2000) 54 International Organization 457. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551299

Kennedy, Duncan. “A Left Phenomenological Alternative to the Hart/Kelsen Theory of Legal Interpretation.” In Duncan Kennedy, Legal Reasoning: Collected Essays (Davies Book Publishers 2008) 154.

Kingsbury, Benedict. “International Courts.” In James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press 2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139035651

Koremenos, Barbara, and Timm Betz. “The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements.” In Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107310.019

Kriangsak Kittichaisaree. The Law of the Sea and Maritime Boundary Delimitation in South-East Asia (Oxford University Press 1987).

Kumar, Shashank P., and Cecily Rose. “A Study of Lawyers Appearing Before the International Court of Justice, 1999–2012.” (2014) 25(3) European Journal of International Law 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu057

Lauterpacht, Elihu. “Principles of Procedure in International Litigation.” (2011) 345 Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law 387.

Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965. ICJ Reports (Advisory Opinion 2019). https://www.icj-cij.org/case/169

Madsen, Mikael. “France, the United Kingdom and the ‘Boomerang’ of the Internationalisation of Human Rights (1945–2000).” In Simon Halliday and Patrick Schmidt (eds), Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context (Hart Publishing 2004).

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “Sociological Approaches to International Courts.” In Cesare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014) 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0018

“New CIA Chief Ran Thailand’s Secret Waterboarding Site.” Bangkok Post (14 March 2018). https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/1427606/new-cia-chief-ran-thailands-secret-waterboarding-site

Nilaratna Xuto. “Thailand: Conciliating a Dispute on Tuna Exports to the EC.” (2005). https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/casestudies_e/case40_e.htm

Nollkaemper, Andre, August Reinisch, Ralph Janik, and Florentina Simlinger (eds), International Law in Domestic Courts: A Casebook (Oxford University Press 2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739746.001.0001

Nottage, Luke, and Sakda Thanitcul. “International Investment Arbitration in Thailand: Limiting Contract-Based Claims While Maintaining Treaty-Based ISDS.” (2017) 18 Journal of World Investment and Trade 793. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340062

Pauwelyn, Joost. “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus.” (2015) 109(4) American Journal of International Law 761–805. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.4.0761

Pellet, Alain. “Introduction from the Podium.” In Edgardo Sobenes Obergon and Benjamin Samson (eds), Nicaragua before the International Court of Justice: Impacts on International Law (Springer 2017) 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62962-9_2

Pellet, Alain. “The Role of the International Lawyer in International Litigation.” In Chanaka Wickremasinghe (ed), International Lawyer as Practitioner (BIICL 2000).

Pellet, Alain, and Tessa Barsac. “Litigation Strategy.” In Hélène Ruiz Fabri (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3109.013.3109

Pierson, Paul. “The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change.” (2002) 13(4) Governance 475–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00142

Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton University Press 2004). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841080

“PM in War of Words as Facebook Threatens Lawsuit.” Bangkok Post (26 August 2020). https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/1974467/pm-in-war-of-words-as-fb-threatens-lawsuit

Pornchai Danvivathana. “Thailand’s Experience in the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Challenging the EC Sugar Regime.” In Gregory C. Shaffer and Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz (eds), Dispute Settlement at the WTO: The Developing Country Experience (Cambridge University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663192.007

Poulsen, Lauge N. S. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries (Oxford University Press 2015).

Rattanasengchanh, P. Michael. “The Role of Preah Viehar in Hun Sen’s Nationalism Politics, 2008–2013.” (2017) 36 Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600303

Request for Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission. ITLOS Reports (Advisory Opinion, 2 April 2015).

“Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-regional Fisheries Commission (SFRC) to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Written Statement of Thailand.” ITLOS (2004). https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/written_statements_round2/21_II-5_Thailand.pdf

Romano, Cesare P. R. “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle.” (1999) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 709.

Romano, Cesare P. R., Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany. “Mapping International Adjudicative Bodies, the Issue, and Players.” In Cesare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.001.0001

Scott, Shirley V. “Litigation versus Dispute Resolution through Political Processes.” In Natalie Klein (ed), Litigating International Law Disputes: Weighing the Options (Cambridge University Press 2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139062008.004

Sewell, Tia. “Unpacking the Recent Uighur ICC Complaint Against Chinese Leader.” (Lawfare, 21 July 2020). https://www.lawfareblog.com/unpacking-recent-uighur-icc-complaint-against-chinese-leaders

Shaffer, Gregory C. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation (The Brookings Institution 2003).

Soave, Tommaso. “Who Controls WTO Dispute Settlement? Socio-Professional Practices and the Crisis of the Appellate Body.” (2020) 29 Italian Yearbook of International Law 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116133-02901003

Strate, Shane. “A Pile of Stones? Preah Vihear as a Thai Symbol of National Humiliation.” (2013) 21 South East Asia Research 41. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2013.0139

Tanaka, Yoshifumi. The International Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108545907

“Thailand Denies Existence of CIA Black Site.” Bangkok Post (12 December 2014). https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/449082/thailand-denies-existence-of-cia-black-site

Thitinan Pongsudhirak. “All Quiet on the Thai–Cambodian Front: Drivers, Dynamics, Directions.” (2018) 26 South East Asia Research 330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X18809591

Tomuschat, Christian. “Article 36.” In Andreas Zimmermann et al. (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814894.003.0048

Vauchez, Antoine. “Communities of International Litigators.” In Cesare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2014) 655–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0030

Vilawan Mangklatanakul. “Thailand’s First Treaty Arbitration: Gain from Pain.” In Susan D. Franck and Anna Joubin-Bret (eds), Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration II. Proceedings of the Washington and Lee University and UNCTAD Joint Symposium on International Investment and Alternative Dispute Resolution (UNCTAD 2011).

Vitit Muntarbhorn. “Thailand.” In Simon Chesterman, Hisashi Owada, and Ben Saul (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Asia and the Pacific (Oxford University Press 2019) 363. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198793854.003.0015

“What Happened at the Thailand ‘Black Site’ Run by Trump’s CIA Pick.” The Atlantic (14 March 2018). https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/03/gina-haspel-black-site-torture-cia/555539/

Young, Margaret A., Emma Nyhan, and Hilary Charlesworth. “Studying Country-Specific Engagements with the International Court of Justice.” (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 582. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz018

Yusuf, Guled, and Godwin Tan. “United Utilities (Tallinn) BV v Estonia: ICSID Arbitration After Achmea: The Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?” (2021) 35 ICSID Review–Foreign Investment Law Journal 183. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa029

Zarbiyev, Fuad. “Saying Credibly What the Law Is: On Marks of Authority in International Law.” (2018) 9(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idy004

Sources in Thai

“คุกลับ จับทรมาน: มรดกและหมุดหมายของมิตรภาพไทย-สหรัฐฯ (ซีไอเอ).” ประชาไท (1 เมษายน 2561). [“Black Site and Torture: Heritage and Milestone of Thai–US (CIA Relations).” Prachatai (1 April 2018).] https://prachatai.com/journal/2018/04/76177

บัณฑิต หลิมสกุล. “ความร่วมมือระหว่างภาครัฐและเอกชนของไทย (Public-Private Partnerships: PPP) ในการใช้กลไกยุติข้อพิพาทภายใต้กรอบ WTO เพื่อแก้ปัญหาการกีดกันทางการค้า.” (2554) 29 วารสารเศรษฐศาสตร์ธรรมศาสตร์. [Bundit Limsakul. “The Proposed Model for Thai Public-Private Partnerships for Resolving Multilateral Trade Dispute under the World Trade Organization (WTO).” (2011) 29 Thammasat Economic Journal] 1.

ปกป้อง ศรีสนิท. กฎหมายอาญาระหว่างประเทศ (วิญญูชน 2556). [Pokpong Srisanit. International Criminal Law (Winyuchon 2013).]

ประสิทธิ์ เอกบุตร. กลไกการระงับข้อพิพาท WTO: วิธีพิจารณาคดีใน WTO และข้อสังเกตเกี่ยวกับการต่อสู้คดีของไทย (พิมพ์ลักษณ์ 2550). [Prasit Aekaputra. Dispute Settlement Mechanisms of the WTO: Procedure and Observations About Thailand’s Litigation Strategy (Pimluk 2007).]

ศูนย์ข่าว TCIJ. “สว. ชี้หากไทยให้สัตยาบันศาลระหว่างปท. เท่ากับลดความคุ้มกัน ‘พระมหากษัตริย์’.” [Thai Civil Rights and Investigative Journalism. “The Senate Said Ratification of the ICC Would Undermine the Immunity of the King.”] TCIJ (11 October 2013). https://www.tcijthai.com/news/2013/11/scoop/3207

“สรุปสาระสำคัญจากสัมมนาวิชาการเรื่อง ‘อนุญาโตตุลาการระหว่างรัฐและนักลงทุนตามสนธิสัญญา: อดีต ปัจจุบัน และอนาคต’.” [“Summary of the Academic Seminar on Investor-State Arbitration: Past, Present, and Future.”] https://www.law.tu.ac.th/summary-seminar-arbitration-state-investor