Law and Identity
The Case of the "Common Law" of Scotland with Comparative Insights from Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.246988Keywords:
Scotland, Thailand, Mixed jurisdictions, Colonialism, Legal historyAbstract
This article will first focus on the “mechanics” of the “mixed legal system” in Scotland, the product of the nineteenth century and rooted in nineteenth-century conceptions of “legal science.” On the other side of the globe, the Thai legal system arose from historical contingency by which the nation sought both international recognition and self-consolidation after the colonial era. Against this backdrop, Thai legal scaffolding has been formed and imprisoned by its legal historiography as an intellectual imagination; in particular, the grand narrative creates local adherence to great legal tradition and rationalisation of Thai traditional values. Thai and Scots law may have had a completely different path of historical contingency, but what the two systems share is an exaggeration of grand narratives that obscure the nature of each legal system. To view these systems of law from a post-positivistic approach, a different approach is needed. After an initial discussion about Scots law, the influence of the civilian tradition upon Thai law will be investigated, followed by a summary of the main conclusions.
References
Ashton, Christina et al. Fundamentals of Scots Law (Thomson/W. Green 2003).
Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Phongpaichit. “The Child is the Betel Tray: Making Law and Love in Ayutthaya Siam.” (2021) 1 Thai Legal Studies 1. https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.245734
Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Phongpaichit. “Introduction to the Thammasat.” In Chris Baker and Pasuk Phongpaichit (eds), The Palace Law of Ayutthaya and the Thammasat: Law and Kingship in Siam (Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications 2016). https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501725968
Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Phongpaichit. “Thammasat, Custom, and Royal Authority in Siam’s Legal History.” In Andrew Harding and Munin Pongsapan (eds), Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law (Cambridge University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914369.004
Bedner, Adriaan. “Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions.” (2013) 5 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404512001145
Beiser, Frederick C. The German Historicist Tradition (Oxford University Press 2015).
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture (2nd edn, Routledge 2004).
Busby, Nicole. Scots Law: A Student Guide (3rd edn, Tottel Publishing 2006).
Cairns, John W. “The Civil Law Tradition in Scottish Legal Thought.” In David L. Carey Miller and Reinhard Zimmermann (eds), The Civilian Tradition and Scots law: Aberdeen Quincentenary Essays (Duncker and Humblot 1997).
Cairns, John W. “Institutional Writings in Scotland Reconsidered.” (1984) 4 The Journal of Legal History 76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440368408530791
Cairns, John W., and Hector L. MacQueen. Learning and the Law: A Short History of the Edinburgh Law School (School of Law, University of Edinburgh 2002).
Cairns, John W., and Paul Du Plessis. “Ten Years of Roman Law in Scottish Courts.” (2008) 29 The Scots Law Times 191.
Calavita, Kitty. Invitation to Law and Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law (University of Chicago Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226089980.001.0001
Chachapon Jayaphorn. Thai Legal History: Pre-Reformation (Winyuchon 2018).
Chaiyan Rajchagool. The Rise and Fall of the Thai Absolute Monarchy (White Lotus 1994).
Clark, Bryan. Scottish Legal System (2nd edn, Dundee University Press 2009).
Cotterrell, Roger. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Routledge 2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351217989
Dewart, Megan H. et al. The Scottish Legal System (6th edn, Bloomsbury 2019).
Dhani Nivat. “The Old Siamese Conception of the Monarchy.” (1947) 36 Journal of The Siam Society 98.
Dilcher, Gerhard. “The Germanists and the Historical School of Law: German Legal Science between Romanticism, Realism, and Rationalization.” (2016) Rechtsgeschichte-Legal History. https://doi.org/10.12946/rg24/020-072
Dressel, Björn. “Thailand: Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary?” In Björn Dressel (ed), The Judicialization of Politics in Asia (Routledge 2012). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115596
Engel, David M. “Rights as Wrongs: Legality and Sacrality in Thailand.” (2015) 39 Asian Studies Review 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2014.990356
Essen, Georg, and Nils Jansen. Dogmatisierungsprozesse in Recht und Religion (Mohr Siebeck 2011).
Festa, Matthew J. “Applying a Usable Past: The Use of History in Law.” (2008) 38 Seton Hall Law Review 479.
Fidler, David P. “A Kinder, Gentler System of Capitulations? International Law, Structural Adjustment Policies, and the Standard of Liberal, Globalised Civilisation.” (2000) 35 Texas International Law Journal 387.
Frankenberg, Günter. “Critical Histories of Comparative Law.” In Markus D. Dubber and Christopher Tomlins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legal History (Oxford University Press 2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.4
Friedman, Lawrence M. “Is There a Modern Legal Culture?” (1994) 7 Ratio Juris 117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00172.x
Friedman, Lawrence M. “Legal Culture and Social Development.” (1969) 4 Law & Society Review 29–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052760
Gaddis, John Lewis. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2004).
Gaudreault-DesBiens, Jean-François. “On the Relative Pertinence of the Civil Law/Common Law Dichotomy When Reflecting on the Relationship Between Comparative Law, Development Law and Living Law. Some Observations in the African Context.” (Social Science Research Network 2017) SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2948564. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2948564
Ginsburg, Tom. “Authoritarian International Law?” (2020) 114 American Journal of International Law 221. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.3
Harding, Andrew J. “Comparative Law and Legal Transplantation in South East Asia: Making Sense of the ‘Nomic Din’.” In David Nelken and Johannes Feest (eds), Adapting Legal Cultures (Hart Publishing 2001).
Harding, Andrew J. “The Eclipse of the Astrologers: King Mongkut, His Successors, and the Reformation of Law in Thailand.” In Penelope Nicholson and Sarah Biddulph (eds), Examining Practice, Interrogating Theory: Comparative Legal Studies in Asia (Brill 2008). https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165182.i-354.89
Hardy, David T. “Lawyers, Historians, and ‘Law-Office History’.” (2015) 46 Cumberland Law Review 1.
Harrison, Rachel V. “Introduction.” In Rachel V. Harrison and Peter A. Jackson (eds), The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand (Hong Kong University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.1515/9789882205475
Herzfeld, Michael. “The Conceptual Allure of the West: Dilemmas and Ambiguities of Crypto-Colonialism in Thailand.” In Rachel V. Harrison and Peter A. Jackson (eds), The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand (Hongkong University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622091214.003.0009
Hoecke, Mark Van. Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Bloomsbury 2013).
Hoecke, Mark Van, and François Ost. “Legal Doctrine in Crisis: Towards a European Legal Science.” (1998) 18(2) Legal Studies 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00013.x
Hooker, Michael Barry. A Concise Legal History of South-East Asia (Clarendon Press 1978).
Husa, Jaakko. “Developing Legal System, Legal Transplants, and Path Dependence: Reflections on the Rule of Law.” (2018) 6 The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 129. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy008
Jackson, Peter A. “The Performative State: Semi-Coloniality and the Tyranny of Images in Modern Thailand.” (2004) 19 Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 219.
Jansen, Nils. The Making of Legal Authority: Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588763.001.0001
Jany, Janos. “Societies of Buddhist Law.” In Janos Jany (ed), Legal Traditions in Asia: History, Concepts and Laws (Springer International Publishing 2020) 265–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2_9
Kanaphon Chanhom. “Codification in Thailand During the 19th and 20th Centuries: A Study of the Causes, Process and Consequences of Drafting the Penal Code of 1908.” (PhD Dissertation, University of Washington 2010).
Kantorowicz, Hermann. Savigny and the Historical School of Law (Stevens 1937).
Kasian Tejapira. “The Irony of Democratization and the Decline of Royal Hegemony in Thailand.” (2016) 5 Southeast Asian Studies 219–37. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.5.2_219
Kelly, John Maurice. A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Clarendon Press 1992).
Kongsatja Suwanapech. “The History of the Initial Royal Command: A Reflection on the Legal and Political Contexts of Kingship and the Modern State in Siam.” In Andrew J. Harding and Munin Pongsapan (eds), Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law (Cambridge University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914369.005
Lingat, Robert. “Evolution of the Concept of Law in Burma and Thailand.” (1950) 38(1) Journal of Siam Society 9.
Lingat, Robert, and Thapanan Nipithakul. “Evolution of the Conception of Law in Burma and Siam.” (2020) 13 Naresuan University Law Journal 1.
Loos, Tamara. “Competitive Colonialisms: Siam and the Malay Muslim South.” In Rachel V. Harrison and Peter A. Jackson (eds), Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand (Hong Kong University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622091214.003.0004
Loos, Tamara. “ISSARAPHAP: Limits of Individual Liberty in Thai Jurisprudence.” (1998) 12 Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 35.
Loos, Tamara. Subject Siam: Family, Law and Colonial Modernity in Thailand (Cornell University Press 2006). https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501728259
Mamdani, Mahmood. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (Princeton University Press 1996).
Mar, Maksymilian Del. “Legal Norms and Normativity.” (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 355. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm005
McDorman, Ted L. “The Teaching of the Law of Thailand.” (1988) 11 Dalhousie Law Journal 915.
McFadzean, Dale. Scots Law for Students: An Introduction (Dundee University Press 2007).
Menski, Werner. Comparative Law in a Global Context (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2006) 37. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606687
Mérieau, Eugénie. “Area Studies and the Decolonisation of Comparative Law: Insights from Alternative Southeast Asian Constitutional Modernities.” (2020) 51 International Quarterly for Asian Studies 153.
Mérieau, Eugénie. “Buddhist Constitutionalism in Thailand: When Rājadhammā Supersedes the Constitution.” (2018) 13 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 283. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.16
Miller, Jonathan M. “A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process.” (2003) 51 The American Journal of Comparative Law 839–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3649131
Munin Pongsapan. “Legal Studies at Thammasat University: A Microcosm of the Development of Thai Legal Education.” In Andrew J. Harding, Jiaxiang Hu, and Maartje de Visser (eds), Legal Education in Asia: From Imitation to Innovation (Brill 2017). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004349698_014
Nelken, David. “Using the Concept of Legal Culture.” (2004) 29 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1.
Nidhi Eoseewong. “The Thai Cultural Constitution.” (Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 15 March 2003). https://kyotoreview.org/issue-3-nations-and-stories/the-thai-cultural-constitution
Pearson, Trais. Sovereign Necropolis: The Politics of Death in Semi-Colonial Siam (Cornell University Press 2020). https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501740152.001.0001
Perju, Vlad. “Constitutional Transplants, Borrowing, and Migrations.” In Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0065
Plessis, Paul du. “Conceptions of Roman law in Scots law: 1900–1960.” In Kaius Tuori and Heta Björklund (eds), Roman Law and the Idea of Europe (Bloomsbury 2019).
Posner, Richard A. “Past-Dependency, Pragmatism, and Critique of History in Adjudication and Legal Scholarship.” (2000) 67 The University of Chicago Law Review 573. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600335
Preedee Kasemsup. “Reception of Law in Thailand, A Buddhist Society.” In Masaji Chiba (ed), Asian Indigenous Law: In Interaction with Received Law (3rd edn, Routledge 2013).
Rahmatian, Andreas. “Alchemistic Metaphors in Comparative Law: Mixed Legal Systems, Reception of Laws and Legal Transplants.” (2018) 11 Journal of Civil Law Studies 231.
Rahmatian, Andreas. “Codification of Private Law in Scotland: Observations by a Civil Lawyer.” (2004) 8 The Edinburgh Law Review 31. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2004.8.1.31
Rahmatian, Andreas. “The Political Purpose of the ‘Mixed Legal System’ Conception in the Law of Scotland.” (2017) 24 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17745802
Rahmatian, Andreas. “The Role of Institutional Writers in Scots Law.” (2018) 1 Juridical Review 42.
Reid, Kenneth G. C., and Reinhard Zimmermann. A History of Private Law in Scotland Vol. 1 (Oxford University Press 2000).
Reimann, Mathias. “Historical Jurisprudence.” In Markus D. Dubber and Christopher Tomlins (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Legal History (Oxford University Press 2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.22
Reimann, Mathias. “Nineteenth-Century German Legal Science.” (1990) 31 Boston College Law Review 837.
Sayre, Francis Bowes. “The Passing of Extraterritoriality in Siam.” (1928) 22 The American Journal of International Law 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2188970
Shiels, Robert S. Scottish Legal System (Green/Sweet & Maxwell 1999).
Siems, Mathias. Comparative Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316856505
Siems, Mathias. “The Curious Case of Overfitting Legal Transplants.” In Maurice Adams and Dirk Heirbaut (eds), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke (Hart Publishing 2014).
Smits, Jan M. “Applied Evolutionary Theory: Explaining Legal Change in Transnational and European Private Law.” (2008) 9 German Law Journal 477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200006544
Smits, Jan M. “The Harmonisation of Private Law in Europe: Some Insights from Evolutionary Theory.” (2002) 31 The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 79.
Somyot Chuethai. “Introduction.” In Somyot Chuethai (ed), Essays in Honour of Preedee Kasemsup (Faculty of Law, Thammasat University 1988).
Streckfuss, David. Truth on Trial: Defamation, Treason, and Lèse-Majesté (Routledge 2011).
Suprawee Asanasak. “Transplanting Regular Impact Assessment in Thailand: A Curious Case of Perfunctory Effect and The Legal Culture of Method.” Asian Law Junior Faculty Workshop, Singapore (January 2021).
Teubner, Gunther. “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences.” (2003) 61(1) Modern Law Review 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125
Thongchai Winichakul. “Siam’s Colonial Conditions and the Birth of Thai History.” In Volker Grabowsky (ed), Southeast Asian Historiography: Unravelling the Myths: Essays in Honour of Barend Jan Terwiel (River Books 2011).
Walker, David M. The Scottish Legal System: An Introduction to the Study of Scots Law (3rd edn, W. Green 1969).
Wasana Wongsurawat. The Crown & The Capitalists: The Ethnic Chinese and the Founding of the Thai Nation (Silkworms Books 2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780295746265
Watson, Alan. “Comparative Law and Legal Change.” (1978) 37 The Cambridge Law Journal 313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300093338
Watson, Alan. The Evolution of Western Private Law (Johns Hopkins University Press 2001).
Watt, Horatia Muir. “The Epistemological Function of La ‘Doctrine’.” In Mark Van Hoecke (ed), Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Bloomsbury 2013).
Westbrook, Raymond. “The Early History of Law: A Theoretical Essay.” (2013) 127(1) Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte. https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.2010.127.1.1
Whitty, Niall R. “From Rules to Discretion: Changes in the Fabric of Scots Private Law.” (2003) 7 Edinburgh Law Review 281. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2003.0002
Winkel, Lourens. “The Role of General Principles in Roman Law.” (1996) 2 Fundamina 103.
Wise, James. Thailand: History, Politics, and the Rule of Law (Marshal Cavendish Editions 2019).
Yut Saenguthai. Lecture on Introduction to Law (4th edn, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University 1971).
Sources in German
Haferkamp, Hans-Peter, Klaus Luig, and Tilman Repgen. Wie pandektistisch war die Pandektistik?: Symposium aus Anlass des 80. Geburtstags von Klaus Luig, am 11. September 2015. (Mohr Siebeck 2017). https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-155459-9
Sources in Thai
กรศุทธิ์ ขอพ่วงกลาง. “ระบบกฎหมายผสม.” (2550) 36 วารสารนิติศาสตร์ 568. [Korrasut Khopuangklang. “Mixed Legal System.” (2007) 36 Thammasat Law Journal 568.]
กิตติศักดิ์ ปรกติ. การปฏิรูประบบกฎหมายไทยภายใต้อิทธิพลยุโรป (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4, วิญญูชน 2556). [Kittisak Prokati. The Reformation of Thai Legal System under European Influences (4th edn, Winyuchon 2013).]
กุลลดา เกษบุญชู มี้ด. ระบอบสมบูรณาญาสิทธิราชย์: วิวัฒนาการรัฐไทย (ฟ้าเดียวกัน 2562). [Kullada Kesboonchoo Mead. The Rise and Decline of Thai Absolutism (Samesky books 2019).]
ทีมข่าวกระบวนการยุติธรรม. “รายงาน: ความโปร่งใสในยุคออนไลน์ เมื่อศาลอังกฤษนำคำพิพากษาขึ้นยูทูบ.” (ประชาไท, 2556). [Justice System Reporters. “Report: Transparency in Digital Age When the English Court Publicise Decisions on Youtube.” (Prachatai, 2013).] https://prachatai.com/journal/2013/02/45495
ธงชัย วินิจจะกูล. คนไทย/คนอื่น: ว่าด้วยคนอื่นของคนไทย (ฟ้าเดียวกัน 2560). [Thongchai Winichakul. Thai/Other: Essays on Otherness of Thainess (Samesky Books 2017).]
ธงชัย วินิจจะกูล. เมื่อสยามพลิกผัน: ว่าด้วยกรอบมโนทัศน์พื้นฐานของสยามยุคสมัยใหม่ (ฟ้าเดียวกัน 2562). [Thongchai Winichakul. Siam at a Turning Point on the Foundational Mentality of Modern Siam (Samesky books 2019).]
ธงชัย วินิจจะกูล. รัฐราชาชาติ (ฟ้าเดียวกัน 2563). [Thongchai Winichakul. Royal Nationalist State (Samesky books 2020).]
ธเนศ อาภรณ์สุวรรณ. “จากความเป็นสมัยใหม่มาสู่ความ(ไม่)เป็นสมัยใหม่.” ใน ธเนศ อาภรณ์สุวรรณ (บรรณาธิการ), ความ(ไม่เป็น)สมัยใหม่ (ศยาม 2560). [Thanet Aphornsuvan. “Introduction: From Being Modern to Being (Not) Modern.” In Thanet Aphornsuvan (ed), Being (Not) Modern (Siam Publishing House 2017).]
ปรีดี เกษมทรัพย์. นิติปรัชญา (คณะนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์ 2557). [Preedee Kasemsup. Legal Philosophy (Faculty of Law, Thammasat University 2014).]
มุนินทร์ พงศาปาน. ระบบกฎหมายซีวิลลอว์: จากระบบกฎหมายสิบสองโต๊ะสู่ประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ (วิญญูชน 2562). [Munin Pongsapan. The Civil Law Systems: From the Twelve Tables to the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (Winyuchon 2019).]
รวินท์ ลีละพัฒนะ. ความรู้ทั่วไปเกี่ยวกับกฎหมาย (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4, วิญญูชน 2561). [Rawin Leelapatana. General Introduction to Law (4th edn, Winyuchon 2018).]
วรเจตน์ ภาคีรัตน์. “กฎหมายคืออะไร #4 วรเจตน์ ภาคีรัตน์: คำสั่งรัฐอันธพาลเป็นกฎหมายหรือไม่.” (ประชาไท, 26 พฤศจิกายน 2554). [Worachet Pakeerut. “What Is Law? #4 Worachet Pakeerut: Is a Gangster State’s Order Law?” (Prachatai, 26 November 2011).] https://prachatai.com/journal/2015/11/62643
สมยศ เชื้อไทย. คำอธิบายวิชากฎหมายแพ่ง: หลักทั่วไป (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10, วิญญูชน 2547). [Somyot Chuethai. Explanation of the Study of Civil Law: General Principles (10th edn, Winyuchon 2004).]
แสวง บุญเฉลิมวิภาส และ อติรุจ ตันบุญเจริญ. ประวัติศาสตร์กฎหมายไทย (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 18, วิญญูชน 2562). [Sawang Boonchalermviphas and Atiruj Tanbooncharoen. The Thai Legal History (18th edn, Winyuchon 2019).]
อานันท์ กาญจนพันธุ์. “พรมแดนความรู้เรื่อง Legal Pluralism.” (2548) 3 วารสารนิติสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ 3. [Anan Ganjanapan. “Knowledge Boundary of Legal Pluralism.” (2005) 3 CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences 3.]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Kongsatja Suwanapech, Paul J. du Plessis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions, but grant Thai Legal Studies the right of first publication in English and to distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (“CC BY 4.0”). It allows others to freely share the work, including the making of translations. There is no charge or fee for readers to immediately view published articles or content, and users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from Thai Legal Studies or the author(s), the only requirement being that an acknowledgement is given of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in English by Thai Legal Studies.
