Constitutional Court Decision No. 19/2564: A Threat to Democracy? Forfeiture of Fundamental Rights and the Judicialization of Politics by the Thai Constitutional Court in 2021

Siravich Teevakul

doi:10.54157/tls.261266

Authors

Siravich Teevakul Office of the Administrative Court of Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.261266

Keywords:

Militant democracy, Judicialization of politics, Politicization of the judiciary, Thai constitutional court, Freedom of expression

Abstract

This article aims to closely examine how the Thai Constitutional Court in Decision No. 19/2564 interpreted Section 49 of the 2017 Constitution as “Thai-style militant democracy,” suppressing the fundamental rights of the citizen, which reflects the characteristics “judicialization of politics” and “politicization of the judiciary” applied by the Court. This article explores the factors behind this interpretation and evaluates the impact of the decision. In Decision No. 19/2564, the Court ruled to suppress the activists’ freedom of expression on the ground that they exercised their rights with the intention to “overthrow” the rule by democracy with the King as the head of state. This ruling not only brings controversies, but also demonstrates the way the Court interpreted the concept of a “democratic regime of government with the King as head of state,” which is a core concept of Thai-style democracy and Thai constitutionalism, and how the Court applied its reasoning to the mechanism of “militant democracy” to defend the regime’s structure. These controversies can be understood by examining the relationship between the political players within Thailand; the workings of informal power; the hidden political structure within the constitution; and Thai judicial culture and identity.

References

Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi, and Ian Zuckerman. “What’s Wrong with Militant Democracy?” (2017) 65(1, supplement) Political Studies 182–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715614849

Agamben, Georgio. State of Exception (University of Chicago Press 2005). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001

Aim Sinpeng. “Hashtag Activism: Social Media and the #FreeYouth Protests in Thailand.” (2021) 53(2) Critical Asian Studies 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1882866

Anusorn Unno. “‘Reform, Not Abolition’: The ‘Thai Youth Movement’ and Its Demands for Reform of the Monarchy.” (2022) 3 ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISEAS_Perspective_2022_3.pdf

Asbury, Anna. Militant Democracy: The Limits of Democratic Tolerance (Bastiann Rijpkema 2018).

Brown, Nathan J., and Julian G. Waller. “Constitutional Courts and Political Uncertainty: Constitutional Ruptures and the Rules of Judges.” (2016) 14(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 817–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow060

Cliteur, Paul, and Bastiann Rijpkema. “The Foundation of Militant Democracy.” In Afshin Ellian and Gelijn Molier (eds), The State of Exception and Militant Democracy in a Time of Terror (Republic of Letters Publishing 2012).

“Constitutional Court Website Renamed ‘Kangaroo Court’.” Prachatai (13 November 2021). https://prachatai.com/english/node/9552

Connors, Michael K. “When the Walls Come Crumbling Down: The Monarchy and Thai-style Democracy.” (2011) 41(4) Journal of Contemporary Asia 657–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2011.610619

Dixon, Rosaland, and David Landau. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing (Oxford University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001

Dressel, Björn. Judicialization of Politics in Asia (Routledge 2012). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115596

Dressel, Björn. “Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary? Considerations from Recent Events in Thailand.” (2010) 23(5) The Pacific Review 671–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2010.521253

Dressel, Björn. “When Notions of Legitimacy Conflict: The Case of Thailand.” (2010) 38(3) Politics & Policy 445–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00243.x

Dressel, Björn, and Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Coloured Judgements? The Work of the Thai Constitutional Court, 1998–2016.” (2018) 49(1) Journal of Contemporary Asia 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1479879

Faraguna, Pietro. “Taking Constitutional Identities Away from the Court.” 41(2) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 491. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol41/iss2/2

Favoreu, Louis et al. Droit des libertés fondamentales (8th edn, Dalloz 2021).

Ferrara, Federico. The Political Development of Modern Thailand (Cambridge University Press 2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449367

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press 2009).

Glaser, Henning. “Permutations of the Basic Structure: Thai Constitutionalism and the Democratic Regime with the King as Head.” In Andrew Harding and Munin Pongsapan (eds), Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law (Cambridge University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914369.017

Glaser, Henning. “Thai Constitutional Court and the Political Order.” (2012) 53(2) Seoul Law Journal.

Greenberg, Udi. The Weimar Century: German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War (Princeton University Press 2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400852390

Haberkorn, Tyrell. In Plain Sight: Impunity and Human Rights in Thailand (The University of Wisconsin Press 2018).

Haberkorn, Tyrell. “Reform is Not Revolt: Preliminary Observations on Constitutional Court Ruling No. 19/2564.” In Tyrell Haberkorn, Constitutional Court Ruling: A Selection of Documents in Justice in Translation 7/2021 (SEALab Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison 2021). https://seasia.wisc.edu/sjsea-project/jsealab/justice-in-translation/

Harding, Andrew, and Rawin Leelapatana. “Constitution-Making in 21st-Century Thailand: The Continuing Search for a Perfect Constitutional Fit.” (2019) 7(2) The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 266–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxz009

Hirschl, Ran. “The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts.” (2008) 11 Annual Review of Political Science 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906

Hirschl, Ran. “The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide.” (2006) 75(2) Fordham Law Review 721–54. https://ssrn.com/abstract=951610

Hirschl, Ran. Toward Juristrocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press 2004).

Jacobsohn, Gary. Constitutional Identity (Harvard University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674059399

Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Laurent Pech. “Why Autocrats Love Constitutional Identity and Constitutional Pluralism: Lessons from Hungary and Poland (2018).” RECONNECT Working Paper No. 2, 10.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Constitutional Amendment in Thailand: Amending in the Spectre of Parliamentary Dictatorship.” (2019) 14(1) Journal of Comparative Law.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “Thailand's Unamendability: Politics of Two Democracies.” In Rehan Abeyratne and Ngoc Son Bui (eds), The Law and Politics of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in Asia (Routledge 2021). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003097099-13

Khemtong Tonsakulrungruang, and Björn Dressel. “The Ties That Bind: Thailand’s Constitutional Court & the Military Junta.” (I-CONnect Blog, 12 June 2019). http://www.iconnectblog.com/2019/06/the-ties-that-bind-thailands-constitutional-court-the-military-junta/

Klamt, Martin. “Militant Democracy and the Democratic Dilemma: Different Ways of Protecting Democratic Constitution.” In Fred Bruinsma and David Nelken (eds), Explorations in Legal Culture (Reed Business BV 2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00371_6.x

Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” (1937) 31(3) The American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948164

Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights II.” (1937) 31(4) The American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1948103

Malkopoulou, Antoula. “Introduction. Militant Democracy and Its Critics.” In Anthoula Malkopoulou and Alexander S. Kirshner (eds), Militant Democracy and Its Critics: Populism, Parties, Extremism (Edinburgh University Press 2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474445627-003

Malkopoulou, Antoula, and Ludvig Norman. “Three Models of Democratic Self-Defense: Militant Democracy and its Alternatives.” (2017) 66(2) Political Studies 442–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723504

McCargo, Duncan. “Competing Notions of Judicialization in Thailand.” (2014) 36(3) Contemporary Southeast Asia. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs36-3d

McCargo, Duncan. “Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand.” (2015) 18(4) The Pacific Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500338937

Mérieau, Eugénie. Constitutional Bricolage: Thailand's Sacred Monarchy vs. The Rule of Law (Bloomsbury Publishing 2021). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509927722

Mérieau, Eugénie. “Thailand Deep State, Royal Power and the Constitutional Court (1997–2015).” (2016) 46(3) Journal of Contemporary Asia 445–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1151917

Müller, Jan-Werner. “Militant Democracy.” In Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional law (Oxford University Press 2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0062

Nelson, Michael H. “Some Observations on Democracy in Thailand.” (2012) SEARC Working Paper Series (No. 125).

Nelson, Michael H. “Thailand’s Legitimacy Conflict Between the Red Shirt Protesters and the Abhisit Government: Aspects of a Complex Political Struggle.” (2011) 29(1) Sicherheit und Frieden. https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274x-2011-1-14

Ossei-Owusu, Shaun. “Kangaroo Courts.” (2021) Harvard Law Review Forum.

Pavin Chachavalpongpun. “Introduction.” In Pavin Chachavalpongpun (ed), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Thailand (Routledge 2019). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315151328

Perju, Vlad. “Constitutional Transplant, Borrowing, and Migrations.” In Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional law (Oxford University Press 2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0065

Plache, Ben. “Soldiers for Democracy: Karl Loewenstein, John H. Herz, Militant Democracy and the Defence of the Democratic State.” (MA thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2013).

Rawin Leelapatana. “The Thai-Style Democracy in Post-1932 Thailand and Its Challenges: A Quest for Nirvana of Constitutional Samsāra in Thai Legal History before 1997.” In Andrew Harding and Munin Pongsapan (eds), Thai Legal History (Cambridge University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914369.016

Rawin Leelapatana, and Abdurrachman Satio Pratomo. “The Relationship Between a Kelsenian Constitutional Court and an Entrenched National Ideology: Lessons from Thailand and Indonesia.” (2020) 14(4) ICL Journal 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2020-0013

Rosenfeld, Michel. “Constitutional Identity.” In Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional law (Oxford University Press 2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0037

Saichon Satayanurak. “Historical Legacy and the Emergence of Judicialisation in the Thai State.” In Michael K. Connors and Ukrist Pathmanand (eds), Thai Politics in Translation: Monarchy, Democracy, and the Supra-constitution (NIAS Press 2021).

Sajó, András. “Militant Democracy and Emotional Politics.” (2012) 19(4) Constellation 562–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12011

Stephen, Dale. “The Age of Lawfare.” (2011) 87 US Naval War College International Law Studies Series.

Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjorn Vallinder (eds). The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York University Press 1995).

Teitel, Ruti. “Militating Democracy: Comparative Constitutional Perspective.” (2007) 29(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 49.

Thak Chaloemtiarana. Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism (Cornell University Press 2019). https://muse.jhu.edu/book/59738

Thiel, Markus. “Germany.” In Markus Thiel (ed), The “Militant Democracy” Principle in Modern Democracies (Ashgate 2009).

Thiel, Markus. “Introduction.” In Markus Thiel (ed), The ‘Militant Democracy’ Principle in Modern Democracies (Ashgate 2009).

Tyulkina, Svetlana. Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Party and Beyond (Routledge 2015). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767819

Varol, Ozan O. “Stealth Authoritarianism.” (2015) 100 Iowa Law Review 1673. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428965

Sources in Thai

กมลชัย รัตนสกาววงศ์. “ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญและวิธีพิจารณาคดีรัฐธรรมนูญ.” ใน การปฏิรูปการเมืองไทย ฐานคิดและข้อเสนอว่าด้วยการออกแบบรัฐธรรมนูญฉบับประชาชนปี 2540 (สำนักงานกองทุนสนับสนุนการวิจัย, 2560). [Kamolchai Rattanasakaowong. “The Constitutional Court and the Constitutional Case Procedure.” In Thai Political Reform: Foundation Ideas and Suggestion for Constitutional Design of 1997 Constitution (Thai Research Fund 2017).]

กฤษณ์พชร โสมณวัตร. “อํานาจแห่ง 'อัตลักษณ์' ตุลาการ.” (2557) 7(1) วารสารนิติสังคมศาสตร์. [Kitpatchara Somanawat. “Power of ‘Identity’ of Judges.” (2014) 7(1) Nitisangkhomsat Journal.]

คำแถลงนิติราษฎร์ฉบับที่ 8 วรเจตน์ ภาคีรัตน์: ตุลาการภิวัฒน์กับการบิดเบือนการใช้อำนาจตุลาการ. [The 8th Declaration of Nitirat Group Worachet Pakeerat: Tulagarnpiwat and the Distortion of Judicial Power.] (2 December 2010).

ธงชัย วินิจจะกูล. นิติรัฐอภิสิทธิ์ และราชนิติธรรม ประวัติศาสตร์ภูมิปัญญาของ. Rule by Law แบบไทย. (ปาฐกถาพิเศษ ป๋วยอึ่งภากรณ์ ครั้งที่ 17, 2563.) [Thongchai Winichakul. Rule by Law of the Privilege State and Royal Rule of Law: The History of the Thai Rule by Law. (17th Special Keynote Address in Memory of Puey Ungphakorn, 2020).]

ธานินทร์ กรัยวิเชียร. พระมหากษัตริย์ไทยในระบอบประชาธิปไตย (กรมวิชาการ กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ 2519). [Thanin Kraivichien. The Thai Monarchy in the Democratic System (Ministry of Education, 1976).]

ธีระ สุธีวรางกูร. ผลของคำวินิจฉัยของศาลรัฐธรรมนูญในคดีรัฐธรรมนูญที่เกี่ยวเนื่องกับคดีอาญา. (จดหมายข่าวศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ ปีที่ 3 ฉบับที่ 2 (เล่มที่ 10) ประจำเดือน มีนาคม–เมษายน 2543). [Teera Suteevarangkul. “The Effect of the Decision of the Constitutional Court on the Constitutional Case in Connection with Criminal Offences.” (The Constitutional Court’s Newsletter on March–April 2000).]

ธีรยุทธ บุญมี. ตุลาการภิวัฒน์ (วิญญูชน 2459). [Thirayuth Boonme. Judicial Review (Winyuchon 2006).]

ปิยบุตร แสงกนกกุล. ศาลรัฐประหาร: ตุลาการ ระบอบเผด็จการ และนิติรัฐประหาร (ฟ้าเดียวกัน 2560). [Piyabutr Sangkanokkul. The Court of the Coup d'état: Judiciary, Authoritarian Regime and Juridical Coup d’état (Same Sky Books 2017).]

ปูนเทพ ศิรินุพงศ์. “ ‘สิทธิพิทักษ์รัฐธรรมนูญ’ ในกฎหมายรัฐธรรมนูญไทย: การกลายพันธุ์ของความคิดทางรัฐธรรมนูญที่รับเข้าจากต่างประเทศ?” (2561) 47(1) วารสารนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์. [Poonthep Sirinupong. “‘Rights to Protect the Constitution’ in the Thai Constitutional System: The Mutation of the Migration of Constitutional Ideas.” (2018) 47(1) Thammasat Law Journal.]

มนตรี รูปสุวรรณ และคณะ. เจตนารมณ์ของรัฐธรรมนูญ (วิญญูชน 2542). [Montri Roobsuwan and others. The Spirit of the Constitution (Winyuchon 1999).]

รายงานการประชุมคณะกรรมาธิการร่างรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย (ครั้งที่ 13) วันพุธที่ 11 มิถุนายน 2540. [Minutes of the 13th Meeting of the Constitutional Drafting Committee on Wednesday, 11 June 1997.]

วรเจตน์ ภาคีรัตน์. ด้วยกฎหมายและอุดมการณ์ (ไชน์พับบิชชิ่งเฮาส์, 2558). [Worachet Pakeerat. By Law and Ideology (Shine Publishing House 2015).]

วรเจตน์ ภาคีรัตน์.. “บทสัมภาษณ์ความเห็นทางวิชาการ การปฏิรูปองค์กรตุลาการ : ความท้าทายในบริบทการเมืองไทย.” (2556) 10(2) จุลนิติ 12. [Worachet Pakeerat. “The Interview on the Judicial Reform: Challenges in Thai Political Context.” (2013) 10(2) Julaniti 12.]

วิศรุต สินพงพร. ”อธิบายคำตัดสินศาล รธน. ปฏิรูป = ล้มล้างการปกครอง.” (Work Point Today 10 พฤศจิกายน 2564). [Wisarut Sinpongpon. “Explanation of the Constitutional Court Decision: Reform=Overthrow the Regime.” (Work Point Today, 10 November 2021).] https://workpointtoday.com/constitutional-court-8/

สมชาย ปรีชาศิลปกุล. เมื่อตุลาการเป็นใหญ่ในแผ่นดิน: รวมบทความว่าด้วยตุลาการภิวัฒน์ ตุลาการพันลึก และตุลาการธิปไตย (บุ๊คสเคป 2562). [Somchai Preechasilpakul. When the Judiciary Rules the Land (Bookscape 2019).]

สมชาย ปรีชาศิลปกุล และคณะ. รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์ โครงการการเมืองเชิงตุลาการและศาลรัฐธรรมนูญไทย. (สกว 2561). [Somchai Preechasilpakul and others. Final Report on Political Judiciary and Thai Constitutional Court. (Thai Research Fund 2018).]

สำนักงานศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ. รายงานการวิจัย เรื่อง สภาพบังคับของคำวินิจฉัยของศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ. (สำนักงานศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ 2550). [The Office of the Constitutional Court. The Research Report on the Binding Force of the Decision of the Constitutional Court. (Office of the Constitutional Court 2007).]