Almost Happiness, But Not Quite: Reluctant Rule by Law and Thai Legal History in Seni Pramoj’s Legal Autobiography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.271502Keywords:
Law and literature, Law and affect, Legal autobiography, Rule of law, Thai legal history, Reluctance, Ugly feelings, Semi-colonialismAbstract
This article engages with Thongchai Winichakul’s intellectual history of “Rule by Law” by using Greta Olson’s law and affect approach as a departure from the traditional field of law and literature, which focuses solely on discursive practices. It foregrounds the non-cathartic affect of reluctance, a less canonized emotion in Seni Pramoj’s autobiography as a meta-feeling that underpins all emotions such as pride, happiness, and shame in the meta-narrative of conservative Thai legal history. Introducing the concept of “Reluctant Rule by Law” and applying Sianne Ngai’s concept of ugly feelings, Lorianne York’s notion of reluctant celebrity, and postcolonial studies as a main framework, this article argues that Seni’s Janus-faced characteristic, navigating between Western legal modernity and Thai tradition, infused a reluctant tone into his historical works. This autobiographical reluctance reveals how the conservative Thai jurist upheld royalist nationalism while addressing semi-colonial ambiguities, perpetuating a semi-colonial reluctance that shapes the meta-narrative of conservative Thai legal history and constitutionalism based on royalist nationalism.
References
Ahmed, Sara. “Affective Economies.” (2004) 22(2) Social Text. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117.
———. “1 Happy Objects.” The Affect Theory Reader (Duke University Press 2010). https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822393047-003/html.
———. The Promise of Happiness (Duke University Press 2010). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392781.
———. “Shame Before Others.” The Cultural Politics of Emotion (NED-New edition, 2, Edinburgh University Press 2014). http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g09x4q.10.
Aristotle. Poetics (Project Gutenberg 2008). https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1974/1974-h/1974-h.htm#link2H_4_0002.
Baldick, Chris. The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2008) 215–16.
Berlant, Lauren. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture (Duke University Press 2008).
Bhabha, Homi. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse” (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/778467.
Chutima Pragatwutisarn. “The Promise of Happiness: Political Imagination in Contemporary Thai Society.” (2021) 16 Philosophia OSAKA. https://doi.org/10.18910/78340.
Glaser, Henning. “Permutations of the Basic Structure: Thai Constitutionalism and the Democratic Regime with the King as Head.” In Andrew Harding and Munin Pongsapan (eds), Thai Legal History: From Traditional to Modern Law (Cambridge University Press 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914369.
Haberkorn, Tyrell. “The Hidden Transcript of Amnesty: The 6 October 1976 Massacre and Coup in Thailand.” (2015) 47(1) Critical Asian Studies 44–68. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14672715.2015.997344.
Jackson, Peter. “Autonomy and Subordination in Thai History: The Case for Semicolonial Analysis.” (2007) 8(3) Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649370701393709.
Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. “The Revival of Buddhist Nationalism in Thailand and Its Adverse Impact on Religious Freedom.” (2021) 8 Asian Journal of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.48.
———. “Toward a New Buddhist Constitutionalism: Law and Religion in the Kingdom of Thailand.” (University of Bristol 2020).
Lysa, Hong. “Invisible Semicolony: The Postcolonial Condition and Royal National History in Thailand.” (2008) 11 Postcolonial Studies 315–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790802226710.
Mead, Kullada Kesboonchoo. “The Cold War and Thai Democratization.” In Albert Lau (ed) Southeast Asia and the Cold War (Routledge 2012).
Mérieau, Eugénie. “Buddhist Constitutionalism in Thailand: When Rājadhammā Supersedes the Constitution.” (2018) 13 Asian Journal of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.16.
Miall, David S. “Reader-Response Theory” In David H. Richter (ed), A Companion to Literary Theory (John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958933.
Natdanai Nachan. “The Constitutions of the Kingdom of Thailand: Elite-Constructed Constitutions (1932–1974).” (Te Herenga Waka–Victoria University of Wellington 2023). https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.24625464.
Olson, Greta. “The Turn to Passion: Has Law and Literature Become Law and Affect?” (2016) 28(3) Law & Literature 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2016.1232925.
Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings (Harvard University Press 2007).
Nobchulee Maleenon., “ ‘No God-Damned Thailander Can Be Trusted to Do a Job Without Getting Political Minded’: The Free Thai Movement and the Politics of Independence During World War II.” (2018) 2(1) Voces Novae 12.
Pandit Chanrochanakit. “Deformed Constitutionalism: Thai-Style Judicialization and the Problem of Parliamentary Supremacy.” (2021) 12 Political Science and Public Administration Journal 1. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/polscicmujournal/article/view/250458.
Paweenwat Thongprasop and Papawin Pechnil. “When Queer Emotions Meet the Constitutional Promise: Dystopian Constitutionalism in Thai Popular Culture.” (2022) 2(2) Thai Legal Studies 251. https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.261281.
Pike, Burton. “Time in Autobiography.” (1976) 28(4) Comparative Literature. https://doi.org/10.2307/1770020.
Prajak Kongkirati. Thailand: Contestation, Polarization, and Democratic Regression (Cambridge University Press 2024.
Singh, Prabhakar. “Of International Law, Semi-Colonial Thailand, and Imperial Ghosts.” (2019) 9 Asian Journal of International Law 46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204425131800005X.
Siravich Teevakul. “Constitutional Court Decision No. 19/2564: A Threat to Democracy? Forfeiture of Fundamental Rights and the Judicialization of Politics by the Thai Constitutional Court in 2021.” (2022) 2 Thai Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.261266.
Smith, Sidonie, and Julia Watson. “The Afterlives of Those Who Write Themselves: Rethinking Autobiographical Archives.” (2020) IX European Journal of Life Writing. https://doi.org/10.21827/ejlw.9.37323.
———. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives (University of Minnesota Press 2001). https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816669851.001.0001.
Thak Chaloemtiarana. “Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism.” (SEAP Publications 2007). https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721106.
Thongchai Winichakul. “Modern Historiography in Southeast Asia: The Case of Thailand’s Royal Nationalist History.” In Prasenjit Duara, Viren Murthy, and Andrew Sartori (eds), A Companion to Global Historical Thought (Blackwell 2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118525395.
———. Moments of Silence: The Unforgetting of the October 6, 1976, Massacre in Bangkok (University of Hawaii Press 2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824882853.
———. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation (University of Hawaii Press 1997). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841294.
York, Lorraine. Reluctant Celebrity: Affect and Privilege in Contemporary Stardom (1st edn, Springer International Publishing 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71174-4_1.
Sources in Thai
Kasidit Ananthanathorn. “The Life of Thai Constitutional Regime (1932–1947)” (Thammasat University 2017) (in Thai). https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:139852.
Kitpatchara Somanawat. “Rule by Law in Context of Thai Legal History” (2020) CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences 13 (in Thai).
ธงชัย วินิจจะกูล. “นิติรัฐอภิสิทธิ์และราชนิติธรรม: ประวัติศาสตร์ภูมิปัญญาของ Rule by law แบบไทย.” นิตยสาร WAY (2563) [Thongchai Winichakul. “Legal Privileged State and Royalist Rule of Law: Intellectual History of Thai-Style Rule by Law.” WAY Magazine (2020)].
ประชุมปาฐกถา และคำอภิปราย พ.ศ. 2489–2509. [Collective of Lectures and Debates 1946–1966.] http://eresource.car.chula.ac.th/chula-ebooks/detail.php.
ปรีดี พนมยงค์. “ความไม่ชอบธรรมของรัฐธรรมนูญฉะบับชั่วคราว (รัฐธรรมนูญใต้ตุ่ม).” (สถาบันปรีดี พนมยงค์ 2564) [Pridi Banomyong. “The Illegitimacy of the Interim Constitution (Hidden-under-a-Water-Jar Constitution).” (Pridi Banomyong Institute 2021)]. https://pridi.or.th/th/content/2021/02/595.
พรรคประชาธิปัตย์. “Democrat Party, Thailand.” Facebook (14 October 2014). https://m.facebook.com/DemocratPartyTH/photos/10152331438701791.
ม.ร.ว. เสนีย์ ปราโมช. “กฎหมายสมัยอยุธยา” (วิญญูชน 2559) [MR Seni Pramoj. “Law in the Ayutthaya Period.”] (Winyuchon 2016).
———. ชีวลิขิต (วิญญูชน 2561) [MR Seni Pramoj. Life’s Destiny] (Winyuchon 2018).
วรวุฒิ บุตรมาตร. “รัฐธรรมนูญ ๒๔๙๐ รัฐธรรมนูญฉบับคณะเจ้า” (ศิลปวัฒนธรรม 2565) 44(1) [Worawut Butramat. “The 1947 Constitution: The Royal Constitution.”] (Silapawatthanatham 2021) 44(1).
สมชาย ปรีชาศิลปกุล. “รัฐธรรมนูญคณะราษฎรในประวัติศาสตร์ (กฎหมาย) กษัตริย์นิยม” The 101 World (24 มิถุนายน 2563) [Somchai Preechasilpakul. “Khana Ratsadon: Constitutions in the History of Royalist Law.”] The 101 World (24 June 2020). https://www.the101.world/khana-ratsadon-constitutions-in-the-history-of-royalist-law/.
อรรถจักร์ สัตยานุรักษ์. ความเปลี่ยนแปลงความคิด/ความรู้สึกเรื่อง "ความซื่อสัตย์" ในสังคมไทย. ภายใต้แผนงานยุทธศาสตร์เป้าหมาย (Spearhead) ด้านสังคม แผนงานคนไทย 4.0, สนับสนุนโดย สำนักงานการวิจัยแห่งชาติ (วช.) [Attachak Sattayanurak. The Change of Thoughts/Emotion about "Integrity" in Thai Society. Spearhead Strategic Plan for Thai Society 4.0, Supported by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)]. https://www.khonthai4-0.net/content_detail.php?id=315.
อาทิตย์ เจียมรัตตัญญู "นักเรียนฟิลิปปินส์" ในทัศนะวิจารณ์ของชนชั้นนำไทยต่อนักเรียนนอกก่อนสงครามมหาเอเชียบูรพา, (2015) 4(7) ชุมทางอินโดจีน เอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้ปริทรรศน์ 559–74 [Arthit Jiamrattanyoo. “‘Philippine-Educated Students’ in the Critical Perception of the Thai Elite Before the Asia-Pacific War.” (2015) 4(7) Indo-China Crossroad: Southeast Asian Review 559–74].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paweenwat Thongprasop
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and publishing rights without restrictions but grant Thai Legal Studies (TLS) the right of first publication in English. Authors also grant TLS a license to publish and distribute the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License that allows others to share the work, including the making of further translations, provided that an acknowledgement is given of the work’s authorship and its initial publication in English by Thai Legal Studies.
Submission of a manuscript to TLS constitutes acceptance by authors of the terms of the license as outlined in this section, and authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the TLS published version of the work (e.g., post it, including any earlier versions of the manuscript, to an institutional or other repository, or to publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Thai Legal Studies.
