Safeguarding Vulnerable Victims Under the Criminal Procedure Code: Has Thailand Done Enough?

Yada Dejchai Tianprasit

doi:10.54157/tls.279620

Authors

Yada Dejchai Tianprasit Thammasat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54157/tls.279620

Keywords:

Vulnerable victims, Criminal justice system, Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand, Victim rights, Victim protection

Abstract

Vulnerable people are individuals who may be at higher risk of harm or exploitation due to numerous variables such as age, physical or mental health, economic status or other factors that impact their ability to protect themselves. As a result, they need extra safeguarding or protection measures, particularly when they are the victims of crime. The protection of vulnerable victims is a fundamental principle of international human rights law and criminal justice systems worldwide. Therefore, several international legal instruments establish guidelines and obligations for states to protect the vulnerable. Thailand’s criminal justice system recognises such vulnerability and has enacted certain rules and measures to safeguard vulnerable victims, uphold their rights, and enable them actively to engage in, and fulfil, their roles within the criminal justice system. However, the current main regulation regarding the protection of victims of crime, the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand B.E. 2477 (1934), has some limitations. This article aims to examine whether Thailand’s Criminal Procedure Code meets international standards for protecting the rights of vulnerable victims. It examines the legislative framework, regulations, and practical implementation of victim protection measures and analyses shortcomings in, and issues with, Thailand’s Criminal Procedure Code by comparing its laws and practices to international human rights standards. Analysis identifies areas where Thailand corresponds with worldwide best practice and where adjustments are required to ensure the protection of vulnerable victims. The article concludes with proposals aimed at enhancing the protection of vulnerable victims under the Criminal Procedure Code and ensuring that their rights are effectively protected within Thailand’s criminal justice system.

References

“Application for Compensation for Victims in Criminal Cases: In the Case of Victims.” Information Centre for Contacting Government Officials (2025). https://info.go.th/procedure/94e56d2c-e5b0-4e83-817d-a248cb0e3eb8/view?lat=&lng=

“Chapter 14 Protection of Victim, Witness and Other Cooperating Persons.” Manual in Human Rights Monitoring (United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner 2011).

“Criminal Complaint.” Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (2022). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_complaint

“Criminal Procedure.” Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute (2022). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_procedure

Dworkin, Gerald. “Paternalism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall edn 2020). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/paternalism/

Ferguson, Claire, and Brent E. Turvey. “Victimology: A Brief History with an Introduction to Forensic Victimology.” In Brent E. Turvey and Wayne Petherick (eds), Forensic Victimology: Examining Violent Crime Victims in Investigative and Legal Contexts (Academic Press 2009).

Goodin, Robert E. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-Analysis of Our Social Responsibilities (University of Chicago Press 1985).

Green, Simon. “Crime, Victimisation and Vulnerability.” In Sandra Walklate (ed), Handbook of Victims and Victimology (Routledge 2007).

Mcnamee, Catherine C., and Mary B. Murphy. “Elder Abuse in the United States.” National Institute of Justice (1 November 2006). https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/elder-abuse-united-states

“Older People: Prosecuting Crime Against.” Crown Prosecution Service (30 April 2020). https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/older-people-prosecuting-crimes-against

Orvis, Gregory P., and John David Reitzel. “Balancing Criminal Victims’ and Criminal Defendants’ Rights.” In Laura Moriarty (ed), Controversies in Victimology (Routledge 2008).

“Policy.” American Bar Association (3 March 2025). https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/policy/

“Right to Access to Justice Under Article 13 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.” United Nations General Assembly (United Nations 2017, A/HRC/37/25)

“Right of Victims to Justice and Protection.” United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (2025). https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/ar/education/tertiary/tip-and-som/module-9/key-issues/rights-of-victims-to-justice-and-protection.html

“Rights of Trans and/or Non-Binary People in Policing.” City of Philadelphia (2024). https://www.phila.gov/2023-06-30-rights-of-trans-and-or-non-binary-people-in-policing/

“Special Measures.” Crown Prosecution Service (2023). https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/special-measures

UNICEF. Implementation Handbook for the Convention on the Rights of the Child (3rd edn UNICEF 2017).

“The United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power.” Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2025). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse

“Victim Assistance and Witness Protection.” United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (2024). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/organized-crime/witness-protection.html

“Victims’ Trust and Confidence in the Criminal Justice System.” Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Government (2021). https://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE69515457

White, Ahmed A. “Victims’ Rights, Rule of Law, and the Threat to Liberal Jurisprudence.” (1998) 87(2) Kentucky Law Journal 357.

Yada Dejchai Tianprasit. “Special Measures for the Interview of Victims with Intellectual Disabilities: A Comparative Study of Laws of Thailand, United Kingdom (England and Wales) and Norway: Final Research Report.” Faculty of Law, Thammasat University (2024). https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:310577

Sources in Thai

เกียรติขจร วัจนะสวัสดิ์. คำอธิบายหลักกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความอาญาว่าด้วยการดำเนินคดีในขั้นตอนก่อนการยื่นฟ้อง (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 7, พลสยาม 2553). [Krietkajorn Wajanasawadi. Explanation of the Principles of Criminal Procedure Law on the Prosecution in the Pre-trial Stage (7th edn, Pholsiam Printing Partnership 2010)].

คนึง ฦๅไชย. คำบรรยายกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความอาญา เล่ม 1 (วิญญูชน 2562). [Kanueng Rachai. Law of Criminal Procedure, Book No.1 (Winyuchon 2018)].

ณรงค์ ใจหาญ. หลักกฎหมาย วิธีพิจารณาความอาญา เล่ม 1 (วิญญูชน 2566). [Narong Jaiharn. Principles of Criminal Procedure Law, Book No.1 (Winyuchon, 2021)].

ภัทรวรรณ ทองใหญ่ และธีรนิติ์ เทพสุเมธานนท์. “มาตรการคุ้มครองสิทธิผู้เสียหายหรือเหยื่ออาชญากรรมในกระบวนการยุติธรรมทางอาญาของประเทศไทย” (2022) 40(1) วารสารกฎหมายจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. [Pattarawan Thongyai and Teerani Tepsumethanon. “The Protection Measures of the Injured Persons or Victims’ Rights in Criminal Justice System in Thailand: Making A Victim Personal Statement” (2022) 40 (1) Chulalongkorn Law Journal 5].

“สรุปรัฐธรรมนูญ 2560: สิทธิในกระบวนการยุติธรรมตัดให้สั้นลง สิทธิมีทนายความหายไป”. [“Summary of the 2017 Constitution: Rights to the Justice Process are Shortened, the Right to a Lawyer is Gone”] iLaw (2019). https://www.ilaw.or.th/articles/3858

อุทัย อาทิเวช. การสอบสวน (วี.เจ.พริ้นติ้ง, 2562). [Uthai Arthitwech. The Inquiry (VJ Printing 2019)].