ENHANCING APPRENTICESHIP EFFECTIVENESS VIA LEARNING ECOLOGY: STRATEGIC OPTIMIZATION IN CHINESE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Tian TIAN Maejo University, Thailand
  • Chalermchai PANYADEE Maejo University, Thailand
  • Somkid KAEWTIP Maejo University, Thailand
  • Jariya KOMENT Maejo University, Thailand
  • Pradtana YOSSUCK Maejo University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/aamr.2026.10

Keywords:

Apprenticeship Effectiveness, Learning Ecology, Vocational Education, Mixed-Methods Research, Strategic Optimization

Abstract

This study investigates the critical factors that influence the effectiveness of modern apprenticeships in Chinese vocational education through the lens of learning ecology. Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the research integrates quantitative data from 438 apprentices with qualitative insights from 48 stakeholder interviews. The findings reveal a hierarchical structure of ecological influence, identifying perceived industry recognition and attitudes toward the dual-mentor system as the most significant predictors of apprenticeship success. Notably, the analysis uncovers a persistent theory-practice gap, fundamentally driven by fragmented institutional collaboration and misaligned curriculum designs. To address these systemic imbalances, this research proposes a comprehensive four-pillar strategic framework. This targeted framework advocates institutionalizing dual-mentor collaborations, establishing dynamic school-enterprise curriculum co-design mechanisms, developing regional skill standards to enhance market credibility, and launching a digital ecosystem platform for transparent resource sharing. Ultimately, this robust study effectively transitions learning ecology from a merely descriptive framework into a highly prescriptive managerial tool, offering vital, evidence-based strategies for institutional administrators to systematically optimize vocational training ecosystems and successfully foster sustainable workforce development across rapidly industrializing Asian economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Reaping the benefits of Industry 4.0 through skills development in Vietnam. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Billett, S. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. London: Routledge.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Bruin, M., Tutlys, V., Ümarik, M., Loogma, K., Kaminskiené, L., Bentsalo, I., … & Buligina, I. (2025). Participation and learning in Vocational education and training - a cross-national analysis of the perspectives of youth at risk for social exclusion. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 77(3), 706-727.

Creswell, J., & Clark, V. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Fenwick, T. (2010). Re‐thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1-2), 104-116.

Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2011). Workplace Learning and the Organization. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Workplace Learning (pp. 46-59). California: SAGE Publications.

Hanau, E., Jeon, S., & Lee, H. (2019). Approaches to dual VET in tertiary education in South Korea. BWP, 48(SE), 47-49.

Imdorf, C. (2017). Understanding discrimination in hiring apprentices: how training companies use ethnicity to avoid organisational trouble. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 69(3), 405-423.

Lee, K., Kim, D., & Lee, H. (2016). Is the meister vocational high school more cost-effective?. International Journal of Educational Development, 51(C), 84-95.

Mikkonen, S., Pylväs, L., Rintala, H., Nokelainen, P., & Postareff, L. (2017). Guiding workplace learning in vocational education and training: A literature review. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9, 9.

Nilsson, A. (2010). Vocational education and training – an engine for economic growth and a vehicle for social inclusion?. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(4), 251-272.

Paryono. (2017). The importance of TVET and its contribution to sustainable development. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1887(1), 020076.

Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in comparative vocational education: Existing models and a new approach. Vocations and Learning, 9, 295-314.

Pilz, M., & Regel, J. (2021). Vocational Education and Training in India: Prospects and Challenges from an Outside Perspective. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), 101-121.

Schaap, H., Baartman, L., & de Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: A review. Vocations and Learning, 5, 99-117.

Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130-154.

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Tian, T., PANYADEE, C., KAEWTIP , S., KOMENT, J., & YOSSUCK, P. (2026). ENHANCING APPRENTICESHIP EFFECTIVENESS VIA LEARNING ECOLOGY: STRATEGIC OPTIMIZATION IN CHINESE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEMS. Asian Administration and Management Review, 9(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.14456/aamr.2026.10