Trade Openness, Economic Growth, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Empirical Examination of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research investigates the complex relationships between economic factors and environmental outcomes, focusing on carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions across 24 countries from 1998 to 2019. Utilizing data from the World Development Indicators and the Penn World Table, the study employs a regression model incorporating scale, technique, and composition effects to analyze the determinants of emissions. The findings reveal nuanced dynamics: while income per capita positively correlates with emissions, an inverted U-shaped relationship between income and CO2 emissions supports the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Furthermore, disparities in factor abundance and technological innovation demonstrate varying impacts on emissions. Importantly, the study highlights the need for policy interventions that foster economic development while promoting environmental sustainability, reducing emissions from international trade, and encouraging the widespread adoption of low-carbon technologies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The paper is published under CC BY-NC-ND, in which the article is freely downloaded and shared in its original form non-commercially and its citation details are identified.
References
Ahmed, K. (2020). Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 274, 111209.
Ahmed, K., & Ahmed, S. (2018). A predictive analysis of CO2 emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(16), 16091-16100.
Albrizio, S., Botta, E., Koźluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2014). Do environmental policies matter for productivity growth? Insights from new cross-country measures of environmental policies (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1176). Paris: OECD.
Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209-226.
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? The American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.
Atici, C. (2012). Carbon emissions, trade liberalization, and the Japan–ASEAN interaction: A group-wise examination. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 26(1), 167–178.
Bekoe, W., & Jalloh, T. (2023). Assessing the economic implications of free trade on environmental quality: Empirical evidence from Africa. Environmental and Resource Economics, 84(1), 19–36.
Castro, P. (2016). Common but differentiated responsibilities beyond the nation state: How is differential treatment addressed in Transnational Climate Governance Initiatives? Transnational Environmental Law, 5(2), 379–400.
Chandran, V.G.R., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445–453.
Chen, J., Lin, X., Wang, X., Peng, L., & Yu, A. (2023). Characteristics and transfer paths of CO2 emissions embodied in trade and China’s carbon reduction strategies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(20), 58077–58089.
Colyer, D. (2011). Environment and GATT/WTO. In D. Colyer (Ed.), Green Trade Agreements (pp. 48-63). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Vries, F. P., & Withagen, C. (2005). Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement (CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2005-18). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.670158
Fernández-Amador, O., François, J.F., Oberdabernig, D. A., & Tomberger, P. (2017). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 135, 269–279.
Frankel, J.A., & Rose, A.K. (2005). Is trade good for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85–91.
Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–337.
Heidari, H., Katircioglu, S.T., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 785–791.
Hyun-Sik, C., & Hae-Chun, R. (2001). Carbon dioxide emissions of Korea and Japan and its transmission via international trade. International Economic Journal, 15(4), 117–136.
Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General. (2023). Global sustainable development report 2023: Times of crisis, times of change: Science for accelerating transformations to sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
Kara, E., Ribaudo, M., & Johansson, R. C. (2008). On how environmental stringency influences adoption of best management practices in agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1530-1537.
Kondo, Y., Moriguchi, Y., & Shimizu, H. (1998). CO2 emissions in Japan: Influences of imports and exports. Applied Energy, 59(2–3), 163–174.
Korves, N., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Monika, A. (2011). Is free trade good or bad for the environment? New empirical evidence. In B. Juan & K. Houshang (Eds.), Climate Change - Socioeconomic Effects (pp. Ch. 1). Rijeka: Intech.
Krist, W. (2013). Globalization and America’s trade agreements. Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kuznets, S. (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Lau, H. C., Ramakrishna, S., Zhang, K., & Radhamani, A. V. (2021). The role of carbon capture and storage in the energy transition. Energy & Fuels, 35(9), 7364–7386.
Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy, 87(6), 1858–1864.
Managi, S., Hibiki, A., & Tsurumi, T. (2009). Does trade openness improve environmental quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(3), 346–363.
Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.
Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221–232.
Stechemesser, A., Koch, N., Mark, E., Dilger, E., Klösel, P., Menicacci, L., Nachtigall, D., Pretis, F., Ritter, N., Schwarz, M., Vossen, H., & Wenzel, A. (2024). Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades. Science, 385(6711), 884–892.
Wang, K., Yan, M., Wang, Y., & Chang, C. P. (2020). The impact of environmental policy stringency on air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 231, 117522.
Wang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2021). The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth – evidence from 182 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123838.