ESG Performance and Bank Financial Risk: The Moderating Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Vietnam
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices are increasingly integrated into banking activities as mechanisms to enhance financial stability and support sustainable development. In emerging economies such as Vietnam, however, ESG adoption remains uneven, and empirical evidence on its implications for bank financial risk is still limited. Moreover, banks operate under fluctuating macroeconomic conditions in which economic policy uncertainty (EPU) may alter the effectiveness of ESG performance. This study examines the impact of ESG performance on the financial risk of Vietnamese commercial banks, with particular emphasis on the moderating role of economic policy uncertainty.
Methodology: The study employs panel data from 24 Vietnamese commercial banks over the period 2014–2024. Bank financial risk is measured using the Z-score (insolvency risk) and the loan loss provision (LLP) ratio (credit risk). ESG indicators are manually constructed from annual and sustainability reports based on 16 standardized criteria across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. A key contribution of this study is the construction of an Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index derived from text-mining official policy documents issued by the State Bank of Vietnam and relevant ministries. Panel estimations including Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Fixed Effects (FE), Random Effects (RE), and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) are conducted, with FGLS serving as the preferred specification to address heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation.
Key Findings: The results reveal heterogeneous effects of ESG dimensions on bank financial risk. Environmental performance is associated with lower Z-scores, indicating higher short-term financial risk, while social performance reduces loan loss provisions, suggesting improved asset quality. Governance does not exhibit a significant risk-mitigating effect under stable policy conditions. However, under heightened economic policy uncertainty, the ESG–risk relationship changes significantly. Environmental and social activities tend to amplify financial risk during periods of elevated policy uncertainty, whereas governance emerges as a key stabilizing factor that enhances banks’ resilience.
Policy Implications: The findings highlight that ESG strategies should be aligned with prevailing macroeconomic conditions. During periods of high economic policy uncertainty, strengthening governance mechanisms is critical for risk management and financial stability. In contrast, environmental and social initiatives may yield more sustainable benefits under stable policy environments. Overall, the study underscores the importance of integrating ESG performance with coherent regulatory oversight and macroeconomic stability to support sustainable banking development in emerging economies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The paper is published under CC BY-NC-ND, in which the article is freely downloaded and shared in its original form non-commercially and its citation details are identified.
References
Azmat, F., & Ha, H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, customer trust, and loyalty—perspectives from a developing country. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21542
Azmi, W., Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., & Karim, M. S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277
Baek, S., & Kang, M. (2025). Does ESG enhance asset quality and funding cost management in banking diversification? Finance Research Letters, 73, 106542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106542
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
Cantero-Saiz, M., Polizzi, S., & Scannella, E. (2024). ESG and asset quality in the banking industry: The moderating role of financial performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102221
Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of US commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.024
Cuong, N. C., & Thanh, L. X. (2025). Renewable energy in Vietnam: Figures and future scope for net-zero target. Journal of the Polish Mineral Engineering Society, 1(2), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.29227/IM-2025-02-41
Dossa, J. V., Gopang, A. A., Thomas, D., & Ukwuoma, C. C. (2025). Does the bank’s nature heterogeneity matter? Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and corporate profitability. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 9(3), 364–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-11-2024-0128
Duong, K. D., Truong, L. T. D., Huynh, T. N., & Luu, Q. T. (2022). Financial constraints and the financial distress puzzle: Evidence from a frontier market before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Investment Analysts Journal, 51(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2022.2037202
El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2023). ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: Concavity-convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1929807
Galeone, G., Ranaldo, S., & Fusco, A. (2024). ESG and FinTech: Are they connected? Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102225
Gambetta, N., Sierra-García, L., García-Benau, M. A., & Novejarque-Civera, J. (2023). The informative value of key audit matters in the audit report: Understanding the impact of the audit firm and KAM type. Australian Accounting Review, 33(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12396
Gangi, F., Meles, A., D'Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699
García, C., & Casalegno, F. (2025). Doing good while doing well? ESG management as an obstacle to impact-oriented sustainable finance in large Spanish banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(5), 6937–6950. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70068
Ghirelli, C., Pérez, J. J., & Urtasun, A. (2019). A new economic policy uncertainty index for Spain. Economics Letters, 182, 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.05.021
Heubeck, T., & Ahrens, A. (2024). Governing the responsible investment of slack resources in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: How beneficial are CSR committees? Journal of Business Ethics, 198(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05798-6
Jain, S., Kumar, A., Dambhare, A., & Mittal, R. K. (2024). Integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in bank asset quality assessment: A review. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Business Practices (ICETSBP 2024) (pp. 624–634). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-544-7_41
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In R. I. Tricker (Ed.), Corporate governance (pp. 77–132). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315191157-9 (Original work published 1976)
Joosen, B. P. (2024). Prudential requirements for ESG risks of banks. In D. Busch, G. Ferrarini, & S. Grünewald (Eds.), Sustainable finance in Europe: Corporate governance, financial stability and financial markets (pp. 291–374). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53696-0_9
Kuzey, C., Uyar, A., & Karaman, A. S. (2023). Over-investment and ESG inequality. Review of Accounting and Finance, 22(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-10-2022-0279
Li, J., Lian, G., & Xu, A. (2023). How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113648
Liang, L. W., Lin, T. J., & Chung, M. Y. (2024). The impact of ESG on the cost efficiency of commercial banks —Evidence from Western European commercial banks. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(8), 5811–5824. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4360
Luu, T. Q. (2023). Impact of earning management and business strategy on financial distress risk of Vietnamese companies. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2183657. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2183657
Miralles-Quirós, J. L., Miralles-Quirós, M. M., & Nogueira, J. M. (2020). Sustainable development goals and investment strategies: The profitability of using five-factor Fama-French alphas. Sustainability, 12(5), 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051842
Pham, H. M., Vuong, N. L., Tran, D. V., Ngo, M. T. H., & Le, T. T. (2025). Does environmental, social, and governance disclosure affect financial performance? An empirical study of Southeast and East Asia commercial banks. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 9(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-024-00361-7
Salike, N., & Ao, B. (2018). Determinants of bank’s profitability: Role of poor asset quality in Asia. China Finance Review International, 8(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-10-2016-0118
Salem, M. R., Shahimi, S., Alma ‘amun, S., Hafizh Mohd Azam, A., & Ghazali, M. F. (2025). ESG and banking performance in ASEAN-5: Disaggregated analysis using System GMM and LSDVC. Sage Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251382564
Siddiqui, O., Sohail, M. K., & Niazi, B. (2024). Non-linearity between ESG and firm value, risk, and performance: A comparison of developing and developed markets. Journal of Innovative Research in Management Sciences, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.62270/jirms.v5i1.57
World Bank (2021). World Development Report 2021: Data for better lives. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2021
