GOOD GOVERNANCE AND MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION IN NORTHEASTERN THAILAND

Khemika Thongrueang

doi:10.14456/apsr.2026.12

Authors

Khemika THONGRUEANG Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Nakhon Phanom University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/apsr.2026.12

Keywords:

Municipal Administration, Good Governance, Local Government Organization, Participatory Governance, Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Abstract

This study comprehensively investigates municipal administration within the context of good governance in Thailand’s upper northeastern provinces—Nakhon Phanom, Mukdahan, and Bueng Kan. Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, the research evaluates administrative effectiveness, examines the precise impact of specific governance principles, and proposes actionable developmental guidelines. The study systematically collected quantitative data from 398 stakeholders, including citizens and municipal staff, and qualitative insights from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 15 seasoned municipal administrators. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that good governance principles collectively account for 75% of the variance in municipal administration (Adjusted R² = .75, p < .001). Notably, accountability, participation, cost-effectiveness, and morality exhibited robust, statistically significant positive effects on administrative performance. In contrast, the rule of law and transparency functioned as baseline institutional prerequisites rather than independent performance drivers. The qualitative findings fundamentally reinforce that cultivating active accountability mechanisms, structured participatory governance, and stringent internal auditing are vital for advancing sustainable municipal administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abas, A., Arifin, K., Ali, M., & Khairil, M. (2023). A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development, 46, 100853.

Abdi, A., Hashi, M., & Latif, K. (2024). Ethical leadership and public sector performance: mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organizational politics and moderator of social capital. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2386722.

Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & Bolívar, M. (2015). Determining factors of transparency and accountability in local governments: A meta-analytic study. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(2), 129-160.

Benito, B., Guillamón, M., & Ríos, A. (2021). Transparency and efficient management in local governments. Cities, 115, 103234.

Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, 1997.

da Cruz, N., & Marques, R. (2014). Scorecards for sustainable local governments. Cities, 39, 165-170.

da Cruz, N., Tavares, A., Marques, R., Jorge, S., & de Sousa, L. (2016). Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review, 18(6), 866-893.

de Araújo, J., & Tejedo-Romero, F. (2016). Local government transparency index: Determinants of municipalities’ rankings. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(4), 327-347.

Determining Plans and Process of Decentralization to Local Government Organization Act, 1999.

Haque, M. (2010). Decentralizing Local Governance in Thailand: Contemporary Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12-13), 673-688.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.

Menzel, D. (2012). Ethics management for public administrators: Building organizations of integrity (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Migchelbrink, K., & van de Walle, S. (2022). A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 1-22.

Nanta, Y. (2023). Administration Based on Good Governance Practice of Local Administrative Organizations at Mueang Phetchabun District, Phetchabun Province. Journal of Academic Research and Innovation in Social Science Review, 3(1), 15-31.

Narbón-Perpiñá, I., & de Witte, K. (2018a). Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review - Part I. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 431-468.

Narbón-Perpiñá, I., & de Witte, K. (2018b). Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review - Part II. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(4), 1107-1136.

Narbón-Perpiñá, I., Arribas, I., Balaguer-Coll, M., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2020). Explaining local governments’ cost efficiency: Controllable and uncontrollable factors. Cities, 100, 102665.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms in Thailand: A Diagnostic Scan. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/01/thailand-regulatory-management-and-oversight-reforms_747639d7/2dbaa2e5-en.pdf.

Piotrowski, S., & van Ryzin, G. (2007). Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306-323.

Rainey, H., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-470.

Regulation of the Office of the Prime Minister on the Establishment of a System of Good Governance, 1999.

Rondinelli, D., Nellis, J., & Cheema, G. (1983). Decentralization in developing countries: A review of recent experience (World Bank Staff Working Papers No. 581). USA.: The World Bank.

Royal Decree on Principle and Procedure for Good Public Governance, 2003.

Shah, A. (ed.). (2006). Local governance in developing countries. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Sucharitkul, J. (2020). Implementing the Principles of the Good Governance to Thai Local Administrations. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 25(3), 288-303.

Tavares, A., & da Cruz, N. (2020). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101249.

van Wart, M. (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration Review, 91(3), 521-543.

Wu, W., & Jung, K. (2016). A missing link between citizen participation, satisfaction, and public performance: Evidences from the city and county of San Francisco. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(4), 392-410.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Yilmaz, S., Beris, Y., & Serrano-Berthet, R. (2008). Local government discretion and accountability: A diagnostic framework for local governance (Social Development Working Papers No.113). USA.: The World Bank.