A structure equation model of total quality management and innovation capability affecting organisational performance

Main Article Content

Sarinya Sirisan
Nalin Pianthong
Monika K. Olejnik

Abstract

The relationship between total quality management (TQM) and innovation capability affecting organisational performance was examined. Empirical data were obtained from a survey of 437 automobile and auto parts industries and 462 electrical and electronic industries. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is used to analyse structural relationships between measured variables and latent construct variables. Findings suggested that TQM and innovation capability had a positive influence on organisational performance. Analysis of the structural equation model for TQM, innovation capability and organisational performance gave consistent results with empirical information. Results from our research showed that TQM had a positive effect on innovation capability and organisational performance. Findings indicated that criteria related with people management and supplier quality management had a stronger correlation with performance. Accordingly, organisations should provide the necessary quality-related training with rewards for superior quality improvement. Leaders should maintain close communication with suppliers concerning quality considerations and design changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Goetsch DL, Davis SB. Quality management for organizational excellence: quality management. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson; 2014.
[2] Dean J, Bowen D. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Acad Manage Rev. 1994;19(3):392-418.
[3] Prajogo DI, Sohal AS. The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: an empirical examination. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2003;20(8):90-918.
[4] Customs T. [Internet]. Thailand: Thailand's top ten to export 2017, [cited 28 April 2017]. Available from: http://www2.ops3.moc.go.th/.
[5] The Office of Industrial Economics. Thai Industrial 4.0 Development Strategy for 20 years (2017-2036). [Internet]. Bangkok: Ministry of Industry;2016 [cited 2017 May 22]. Available from: http://www.oie.go.th/assets/portals/1/fileups/2/files/Industrial%20Master%20Plan/thailandindustrialdevelopmentstrategy4.0.pdf.
[6] Becheikh N, Landry R, Armara N. Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation. 2006;26(5/6):644-664.
[7] The Office of Industrial Economics. National industrial development master plan. [Internet]. Bangkok: Ministry of Industry;2011 [cited 2016 Jun 28]. Available from: http://reg3.diw.go.th/policy/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/National_Industrial_Development_Master_Plan.pdf.
[8] Golhar DY, Waller MMA. Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci. 1996;27(1):23-56.
[9] Juneja D, Ahmad S, Kumar S. Adaptability of total quality management to service sector. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Appl Manag Stud. 2011;11(2):93-98.
[10] Karani SR, Bichanga WO. Effects of total quality management implementation on business performance in service institutions: a case of Kenya wildlife services. Int J Res Stud Manag. 2012;1(1):59-76.
[11] Zehir C, Sadikoglu E. Relationships among total quality management practices: an empirical study in Turkish industry. Int J Performability Eng. 2012;8(6):667-668.
[12] Sadikoglu E, Zehir C. Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance:an empirical study of Turkish firms. Int J Prod Econ. 2010;127(1):13-26.
[13] Prajogo DI, Hong SW. The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: a perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation. 2008;28(12):855-863.
[14] Kaynak H. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J Oper Manag. 2003;21(4):405-435.
[15] Brah S, Tee S, Madhu RB. Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2002;19(4):356-379.
[16] Prajogo DI, Sohal AS. The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega. 2006;34(3):296-312.
[17] Agus A. The structural linkages between TQM, product quality performance, and business performance: Preliminary empirical study in electronics companies. Singap Manag Rev. 2005;27(1):87-106.
[18] Prajogo DI, Sohal AS. The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and organization performance-the mediating role of TQM. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;168(1):35-50.
[19] Sirisan S, Pianthong N. The relationship between TQM and innovation capability affecting organizational performance: a conceptual framework for Thailand automobile and electronic industry. Proceeding of the 7th international graduate research conference (IGRC7);2017 Oct 19-20; Ubon Ratchathani province: 2017;7(1):255-276.
[20] Prajogo DI, Ahmed PK. Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R D Manag. 2006;36(5):499-515.
[21] Schroeder R, Scudder G, Elm D. Innovation in manufacturing. J Oper Manag. 1989;8(1):1-15.
[22] Nohria N, Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad Manage J. 1996;39(1):1245-1264.
[23] Samson D, Terziovski M. The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J Oper Manag. 1999;17(4):393-409.
[24] Yusr MM. Innovation capability and its role in enhancing the relationship between TQM practices and innovation performance. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2016;2(1):6.
[25] Perdomo-Ortiz J, González-Benito J, Galende J. Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability. Technovation. 2006;20(10):1170-1185.
[26] Das A, Paul H, Swierczek FW. Developing and validating total quality management (TQM) constructs in the context of Thailand's manufacturing industry. Benchmark Int J. 2008;15(1):52-72.
[27] Feng J, Prajogo DI, Tan KC, Sohal AS. The impact of TQM practices on performance: a comparative study between Australian and Singaporean organizations. Eur J Innov Manag. 2006;9(3):269-278.
[28] Rajapathirana RJ, Hui Y. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. J Innov Knowl. 2018;3(1):44-55.
[29] Karabulut AT. Effects of innovation types on performance of manufacturing firms in Turkey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;195:1355-1364.
[30] Muhamad MR, Ebrahim Z, Hami N. The influence of innovation performance towards manufacturing sustainability performance. Proceeding of 2014 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management; 2014 Jan 7-9;Bali, Indonesia. 2014;4(1):2539-2547.
[31] Alam SS, Arumugam V, Nor NGM, Kaliappan P, Fang LS. Relationships between innovation capabilities, business performance, marketing performance and financial performance: a literature review. Bus Manag Horiz. 2013;1(1):59-73.
[32] Jiménez JD, Sanz VR. Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. J Bus Res. 2011;64(4):408-417.
[33] Gunday G, Ulusoy G, Kilic K, Alpkan L. Effects of innovation types on firm performance. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;133(2):662-676.
[34] Camisón C, Villar LA. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J Bus Res. 2014;67(1):2891-2902.
[35] Ul HM, Mukhtar A, Qureshi SU, Sharif S. Impact of TQM practices on firm's performance of Pakistan's manufacturing organizations. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2012;2(10):232.
[36] Hult GTM, Hurley RF, Knight GA. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Ind Mark Manag. 2004;33(5):429-438.
[37] Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manag. 2002;31(6):515-524.
[38] Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW. Administrative science quarterly: assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36(3):421-458.
[39] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39-50.
[40] Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York:McGraw Hill;1978.
[41] O'Leary KSW, Vokurka RJ. The empirical assessment of construct validity. J Oper Manag. 1998;16(4):387-405.
[42] Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling: A Multidiscipl J. 1999;6(1):1-55.
[43] Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge;2010.
[44] Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated (Introducing statistical methods series) 1st ed. London:SAGE;2013.
[45] Leavengood SA. Identifying best quality management practices for achieving quality and innovation performance in the forest products industry. 2010;19:312-319.
[46] Kim DY, Kumar V, Kumar U. Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. J Oper Manag. 2012;30(4):295-315.
[47] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Oslo manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris:2005.
[48] Martínez CM, Martínez LAR, Choi TY. Simultaneous consideration of TQM and ISO 9000 on performance and motivation: an empirical study of Spanish companies. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;1(113): 23-39.