Different fit factors for the N95 respirator during endotracheal intubation: Comparing video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy

Main Article Content

Khontorn Jankusol
Naesinee Chaiear
Thapanawong Mitsungnern

Abstract

Endotracheal tube (ET) intubation is a high-risk procedure for healthcare workers (HCWs) because of exposure to aerosolized disease particles. The effectiveness of (N95) respirators may be decreased by movements due to leakage, especially during ET intubation by direct laryngoscopy (DL). A randomized crossover study was conducted to compare the fit factor of a duckbill-shaped N95 between video laryngoscopy (VL), DL, and ET intubation. Physicians (n34) were enrolled and randomized to each study arm. A quantitative fit test machine measured the fit factor during ET intubation (primary outcome) using VL vs. DL. The lowest fit factor with VL was higher than with DL (168 vs. 88, p0.048). An acceptable fit for an N95 during ET intubation (secondary outcome) with VL was 88.2% compared to 67.6% with DL, albeit the difference was not statistically significant (p0.065). In addition, the angle of head-up and hip bending with VL were lower than with DL (0° vs. 10°, p<0.001, 0° vs. 32°, p <0.001). In conclusion, VL can achieve a superior N95 fit during ET intubation over against DL because the need for physician movement is decreased. HCWs should consider performing ET intubation with VL instead of DL for a more stable N95 fit.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jankusol, K. ., Chaiear, N., & Mitsungnern, T. . (2023). Different fit factors for the N95 respirator during endotracheal intubation: Comparing video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 28(02), APST–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2023.28
Section
Research Articles

References

Ather B, Mirza TM, Edemekong PF. Airborne precautions. 1st ed. Florida: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797.

World Health Organization. WHO director-general's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020, https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 [accessed 18 November 2021].

World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infections when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-332299 [accessed 18 November 2021].

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hospital respiratory protection program toolkit: resources for respirator program administrators, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2015-117/default.html [accessed 18 November 2021].

Grinshpun SA, Haruta H, Eninger RM, Reponen T, McKay RT, Lee S-A. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particulate respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009;6(10):593-603.

Lim T, Lee S, Oh J, Kang H, Ahn C, Song Y, et al. Endotracheal intubation using a direct laryngoscope and the protective performances of respirators: a randomized trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7565706.

Kim H, Baek JE, Seo HK, Lee JE, Myong JP, Lee SJ, et al. Assessing real-time performances of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors. Ind Health. 2015;53(6):553-561.

Lei Z, Ji X, Li N, Yang J, Zhuang Z, Rottach D. Simulated effects of head movement on contact pressures between headforms and N95 filtering facepiece respirators-part 1: headform model and validation. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014;58(9):1175-1185.

Lei Z, Ji X, Li N, Yang J, Zhuang Z, Rottach D. Simulated effects of head movement on contact pressures between headforms and N95 filtering facepiece respirators part 2: simulation. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014;58(9):1186-1199.

Zeidan A, Bamadhaj M, Al-Faraidy M, Ali M. Videolaryngoscopy Intubation in patients with COVID-19: how to minimize risk of aerosolization? Anesthesiology. 2020;133(2):481-483.

Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(5):568-576.

Brown CA, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, Carlson JN, April MD, Kilgo RW, et al. Video laryngoscopy compared to augmented direct laryngoscopy in adult emergency department tracheal intubations: a national emergency airway registry (NEAR) study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(2):100-108.

Crutchfield CD, Fairbank EO, Greenstein SL. Effect of test exercises and mask donning on measured respirator fit. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999;14(12):827-837.

Oestenstad RK, Bartolucci AA. Factors affecting the location and shape of face seal leak sites on half-mask respirators. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010;7(6):332-341.

Coffey CC, Lawrence RB, Campbell DL, Zhuang Z, Calvert CA, Jensen PA. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004;1(4):262-271.

Kang H, Lee Y, Lee S, Song Y, Lim TH, Oh J, et al. Protection afforded by respirators when performing endotracheal intubation using a direct laryngoscope, GlideScope®, and i-gel® device: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195745.

Buchner A. G*power: statistical power analyses for mac and windows, https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arb

eitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower [accessed 18 November 2021].

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NIOSH - approved particulate filtering facepiece respirators, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics /respirators/disp_part/default.html [accessed 18 November 2021].

Lawrence RB, Duling MG, Calvert CA, Coffey CC. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006;3(6):465-474.

Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Occupational safety and health administration: 1910.134 - fit testing procedures (mandatory), https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.13

AppA [accessed 11 January 2021].

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NIOSH-approved N95 particulate filtering facepiece respirators, https://www/cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/N95list1.html [accessed 5 November 2021].

Zhuang Z, Bradtmiller B, Shaffer RE. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007;4(9):647-659.

Niezgoda G, Kim JH, Roberge RJ, Benson SM. Flat fold and cup-shaped N95 filtering facepiece respirator face seal area and pressure determinations: a stereophotogrammetry study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):419-424.

Association of online tool resource, https://www.kinovea.org/ [accessed 18 November 2021].

Kim JH, Wu T, Powell JB, Roberge RJ. Physiologic and fit factor profiles of N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators for use in hot, humid environments. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(2):194-198.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Proper N95 respirator use for respiratory protection preparedness, https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2020/03/16/n95-preparedness/ [accessed 18 November 2021].

Piantadosi S. Crossover designs. In: Shewhart WA, Wilks SS, editors. Clinical trials: a methodologic perspective. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 2005, p. 515-528.

Shaffer RE, Janssen LL. Selecting models for a respiratory protection program: what can we learn from the scientific literature? Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(2):127-132.

Roberge RJ, Monaghan WD, Palmiero AJ, Shaffer R, Bergman MS. Infrared imaging for leak detection of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a pilot study. Am J Ind Med. 2011;54(8):628-636.

Monette DL, Brown CA, Benoit JL, McMullan JT, Carleton SC, Steuerwald MT, et al. The impact of video laryngoscopy on the clinical learning environment of emergency medicine residents: a report of 14,313 intubations. AEM Educ Train. 2019;3(2):156-162.

Kim H, Lee J, Lee S, Oh J, Kang B, Lim TH, et al. Comparison of fit factors among healthcare providers working in the Emergency Department Center before and after training with three types of N95 and higher filter respirators. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(6):e14250.

Hannum D, Cycan K, Jones L, Stewart M, Morris S, Markowitz SM, et al. The effect of respirator training on the ability of healthcare workers to pass a qualitative fit test. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17(10):636-640.

Lee MC, Takaya S, Long R, Joffe AM. Respirator-fit testing: does it ensure the protection of healthcare workers against respirable particles carrying pathogens? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(12):1149-1156.