Effect of solvent types in chitosan-based nanocomposite coating on internal quality and eggshell morphology

Main Article Content

Hanieh H. Sharbatdar
Dariush Khademi Shurmasti

Abstract

In recent years, the use of bio-friendly nanocomposite coating as egg packaging has vigorously developed considering environmental consequences arising from using synthetic polymers. This study aimed at investigating the effect of solvent types and montmorillonite incorporated in a chitosan-based coating on internal quality and eggshell morphology. Chitosan-based coatings were prepared with different types of solvent (1% acetic acid; CAc, and 1% lactic acid; CLa) and without or with 2% nanoclay (NC). The coatings were applied by immersion of eggs, followed by air-drying, and stored at 25°C for 5 wk. Internal quality parameters including weight loss (WL), Haugh unit (HU), and yolk index (YI) were weekly determined during storage. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometer were also used to describe the outer surface morphology of eggshells. On day 35, HU and YI values (66.20 and 0.34 respectively) in acetic acid-soluble nano-montmorillonite-coated (CAcNC) eggs were significantly (p<0.05) superior to other treatments. At the same time, the WL was progressively increased in all the groups, but the least WL value (5.35%) was observed in CAcNC-coated eggs. The images by SEM and spectra of FTIR showed that nanocomposite coatings could seal the surface of eggshells to prevent interior chemical changes. In general, the bio-packaging of eggs with acetic acid-soluble chitosan coatings, especially along with nano-montmorillonite, can play a significant role in maintaining the integrity properties of the eggshell, improving the internal quality, and consequently extending the egg's shelf life.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sharbatdar, H. H., & Khademi Shurmasti, D. (2023). Effect of solvent types in chitosan-based nanocomposite coating on internal quality and eggshell morphology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 28(04), APST–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2023.65
Section
Research Articles

References

Yuceer M, Caner C. The impact of coatings and novel processing techniques on the functionality of table eggs during extended storage period at ambient temperature. J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45(3):e15261.

Hincke MT, Nys Y, Gautron J, Mann K, Navarro RAB. The eggshell: structure, composition and mineralization. Front Biosci. 2012;17:1266-1280.

Wong YC, Herald TJ, Hachmeister KA. Evaluation of mechanical and barrier properties of protein coating on eggshell. Poult Sci. 1996;75:417-422.

Oliveira GS, Santos VM, Rodrigues JC, Santana AP. Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating. Poult Sci. 2020;99:7207-7213.

Xu D, Wang J, Ren D, Wu X. Effects of chitosan coating structure and changes during storage on their egg preservation performance. Coat. 2018;8:317.

Ndife J, Alozie EN, Awogbenja MD, Ama UI. Effect of oil pre-treatments on the storage quality of chicken fresh shell eggs. Niger Agric J. 2020;51(2):504-512.

Ehsan M, Khademi Shurmasti D. Effect of washing and active nanocomposite coating of carboxymethyl cellulose-nanoclay containing marjoram extract (Origanum vulgare L) on egg quality during storage at ambient temperature. IFSTRJ. 2021;18(118):107-118.

Hasan M, Kumar A, Maheshwari C, Mangraj S. Biodegradable and edible film: a counter to plastic pollution. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(1):2242-2245.

Kopacic S, Bauer W, Walzl A, Leitner E, Zankel A. Alginate and chitosan as a functional barrier for paper-based packaging materials. Coat. 2018;8:235.

Kabanov VL, Novinyuk LV. Chitosan application in food technology: a review of recent advances. Food Syst. 2020;3(1):10-15.

Bhale S, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W, Farr AJ, Nadarajah K, Meyers SP. Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. J Food Sci. 2003;68(7):2378-2383.

Kim SH, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W. Effect of molecular weight, type of chitosan, and chitosan solution pH on the shelf-life and quality of coated eggs. J Food Sci. 2007;72(1):S044-S048.

Kim SH, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W. Plasticizer types and coating methods affect quality and shelf life of eggs coated with chitosan. J Food Sci. 2008;73:S111-S117.

Kim SH, No HK, Kim SD, Prinyawiwatkul W. Effect of plasticizer concentration and solvent types on shelf-life of eggs coated with chitosan. J Food Sci. 2006;71(4):S349-S353.

Kumar S, Ye F, Dobretsov S, Dutta J. Chitosan nanocomposite coatings for food, paints, and water treatment applications. Appl Sci. 2019;9:2409.

Mujtaba M, Morsi RE, Kerch G, Elsabee MZ, Kaya M, Labidi J, et al. Current advancements in chitosan-based film production for food technology; a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;121:889-904.

Kerch G, Korkhov V. Effect of storage time and temperature on structure, mechanical and barrier properties of chitosan-based films. Eur Food Res Technol. 2010;232(1):17-22.

Derelioglu E, Turgay O. Effect of chitosan coatings on quality and shelf-life of chicken and quail eggs. Afr J Food Sci Res. 2022;16(3):63-70.

Yi SZ, Liu Q, Xu D, Li D. Preservation effects of chitosan/nano-montmorillonite coating on clean eggs. Packag Eng. 2017;7:12.

Kim JT, Lee DY, Oh TS, Lee DH. Characteristics of nitrile-butadiene rubber layered silicate nanocomposites with silane coupling agent. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;89(10):2633-2640.

Soares RDA, Borges SV, Dias MV, Piccoli RH, Fassani EJ, Silva CEM. Impact of whey protein isolate/sodium montmorillonite/sodium metabisulfite coating on the shelflife of fresh eggs during storage. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2021;139:110611.

Xu Y, Ren, X, Milford A. Chitosan/clay nanocomposite film preparation and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;99:1684-1691.

Xu L, Zhang H, Lv X, Chi Y, Wu Y, Shao H. Internal quality of coated eggs with soy protein isolate and montmorillonite: Effects of storage conditions. Int J Food Prop. 2017;20(8):1921-1934.

Ryu KN, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W. Internal quality and shelf life of eggs coated with oils from different sources. J Food Sci. 2011;76:S325-S329.

Haugh RR. A new method for determining the quality of an egg. US Egg Poultry. 1937;39:27-49.

Casariego A, Souza BWS, Cerqueira MA, Teixeira JA, Cruz L, Diaz R, et al. Chitosan/clay films’ properties as affected by biopolymer and clay micro/nanoparticles’ concentrations. Food Hydrocoll. 2009;23:1895-1902.

Suresh PV, Raj KR, Nidheesh T, Pal GK, Sakhare PZ. Application of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of table eggs under tropical room conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(10):6345-6354.

Sheng L, Huang MJ, Wang J, Xu Q, Hammad HHM, Ma MH. A study of storage impact on ovalbumin structure of chicken egg. J Food Eng. 2018;219:1-7.

Omana DA, Liang Y, Kav NN, Wu J. Proteomic analysis of egg white proteins during storage. Proteomics. 2011;11:144-153.

Lee JE, Kim KM. Characteristics of soy protein isolate-montmorillonite composite films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2010;118(4):2257-2263.

Gasca DN, Munoz A, Navarro RAB. Quality assessment of chicken eggshell cuticle by infrared spectroscopy and staining techniques: A comparative study. Br Poult Sci. 2017;58:517-522.

Caner C, Yuceer M. Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poul Sci. 2015;94:1665-1677.