Life cycle assessment of nano-silica coating for solar photovoltaic panel

Main Article Content

Pakon Laopreecha
Viganda Varabuntoonvit
Pisist Kumnorkaew
Tanyakorn Muangnapoh
Tippawan Sodsai

Abstract

Accumulation of dust, sand, water, or any pollution plume affects the efficiency of photovoltaic panels (PVs) by obstructing light transmittance to each PV module. This study prepared nano-silica with superhydrophobic and self-cleaning properties for coating on PVs. The Stöber process was used as a selective method to synthesize the nano-silica particles. Life cycle assessment was used to evaluate and compare the total environmental impact of coated and uncoated PV. The nano-silica coating was applied on PVs using a spraying technique and tested for efficiency in Pathum Thani and Chiang Rai provinces, Thailand. Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden (CML) method, a common method for chemical products, was selected as the life cycle impact assessment method, which is commonly used for chemical products. The functional unit was defined as 1 kWh of electricity produced, with the lifetime of a PV being 25 years. The results showed that the efficiency improvement from the coating material could reduce the environmental impact by 2.08% compared to the uncoated PV. However, in the assessment, the impact on photochemical oxidation slightly increased from the additional chemical consumption for the nano-silica coating preparation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Laopreecha, P., Varabuntoonvit, V., Kumnorkaew, P., Muangnapoh, T., & Sodsai, T. (2022). Life cycle assessment of nano-silica coating for solar photovoltaic panel. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 27(02), APST–27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2022.38
Section
Research Articles

References

Arias LA, Rivas E, Santamaria F, Hernandez V. A review and analysis of trends related to demand response. Energies. 2018;11:1617.

Malamis S, Katsou E, Inglezakis VJ, Kershaw S, Venetis D, Folini S. Urban Environment. In: Poulopoulos SG, Inglezakis VJ, editors. Environment and Development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 287-362.

El Morabet R. Effects of outdoor air pollution on human health. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences: Elsevier; 2018.

Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N, Gorini R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019;24:38-50.

Goal 7 | Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all, https://sdgs.un.org/ goals/goal7. [Accessed 22 December 2020].

Bhatia SC. Energy resources and their utilisation. In: Bhatia SC, editor. Advanced renewable energy systems, New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing India; 2014, p. 1-31.

Mejia F, Kleissl J, Bosch JL. The effect of dust on solar photovoltaic systems. Energy Procedia. 2014;49: 2370-2376.

Chen Y, Liu Y, Tian Z, Dong Y, Zhou Y, Wang X, et al. Experimental study on the effect of dust deposition on photovoltaic panels. Energy Procedia. 2019;158:483-489.

Paudyal BR, Shakya SR. Dust accumulation effects on efficiency of solar PV modules for off grid purpose: a case study of Kathmandu. Sol Energy. 2016;135:103-110.

He G, Zhou C, Li Z. Review of self-cleaning method for solar cell array. Procedia Eng. 2011;16: 640-645.

Ebnesajjad S, Morgan RA. 7 - fluorinated additives for plastics. In: Ebnesajjad S, Morgan RA, editors. Fluoropolymer Additives. Oxford: William Andrew Publishing; 2012. p. 107-148.

Feist WC, Abdullahi AA. Wood: finishes and coatings. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering: Elsevier; 2016.

Vazirinasab E, Jafari R, Momen G. Application of superhydrophobic coatings as a corrosion barrier: a review. Surf Coat Technol. 2018;341:40-56.

Tomasino C. effect of wet processing and chemical finishing on fabric hand. In: Behery HM, editor. Effect of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand, Hertfordshire: Woodhead Publishing; 2005, p. 289-341.

Hsieh CT, Wu FL, Chen WY. Super water- and oil-repellencies from silica-based nanocoatings. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;203(22):3377-3384.

Joshi M, Adak B. Advances in nanotechnology based functional, smart and intelligent textiles: a review. In: Andrews DL, Lipson RH, Nann T, editors. Comprehensive Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (Second Edition), Oxford: Academic Press; 2019, p. 253-290.

Wayne Hicks. Scientists studying solar try solving a dusty problem, https://www.nrel.gov/news/features/ 2021/scientists-studying-solar-try-solving-a-dusty-problem.html; 2021 [Accessed 30 November 2021]

Sánchez-Cruces E, Barrera E, Lavanderos K, González F. Life cycle analysis (LCA) of solar selective thin films by electrodeposition and by sol-gel techniques. Energy Procedia. 2014;57:2812-2818.

Whittaker MH, Heine L. Toxicological and environmental issues associated with waterproofing and water repellent formulations. In: Williams J, editor. Waterproof and water repellent textiles and clothing. Washington DC: Woodhead Publishing; 2018, p. 89-120.

Barrera EG, Livotto PR, Santos JHZd. Hybrid silica bearing different organosilanes produced by the modified Stöber method. Powder Technol. 2016;301:486-492.

Bazuła PA, Arnal PM, Galeano C, Zibrowius B, Schmidt W, Schüth F. Highly microporous monodisperse silica spheres synthesized by the Stöber process. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014;200:317-325.

Fernandes RS, Raimundo IM, Pimentel MF. Revising the synthesis of Stöber silica nanoparticles: a multivariate assessment study on the effects of reaction parameters on the particle size. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2019;577:1-7.

Cao C. Sustainability and life assessment of high strength natural fibre composites in construction. Advanced high strength natural fibre composites in construction, Hertfordshire: Woodhead Publishing; 2017, p. 529-544.

Sendy A. How long do solar panels actually last? Solar reviews, https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/ how-long-do-solar-panels-last/files/6/how-long-do-solar-panels-last.html; 2020 [Accessed 30 November 2020].

Mansor MR, Mastura MT, Sapuan SM, Zainudin AZ. The environmental impact of natural fiber composites through life cycle assessment analysis. In: Jawaid M, Thariq M, Saba N, editors. Durability and life prediction in biocomposites, fibre-reinforced vomposites and hybrid composites, Hertfordshire: Woodhead Publishing; 2019, p. 257-285.

Laurin L, Dhaliwal H. Life cycle environmental impact assessment. In: Abraham MA, editor. Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. Oxford: Elsevier; 2017, p. 225-232.

Ozbilen A, Dincer I, Hosseini M. Comparative life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas and conventional vehicles. In: Dincer I, Colpan CO, Kizilkan O, editors. Exergetic, energetic and environmental dimensions, Cambridge: Academic Press; 2018, p. 913-934.

Rasul MG, Arutla LKR. Environmental impact assessment of green roofs using life cycle assessment. Energy Rep. 2020;6:503-508.

Marx J, Schreiber A, Zapp P, Haines M, Hake JF, Gale J. Environmental evaluation of CCS using life cycle assessment-a synthesis report. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:2448-2456.

Torabi F, Ahmadi P. Battery technologies. In: Torabi F, Ahmadi P, editors. Simulation of battery systems, Cambridge: Academic Press; 2020, p. 1-54.

Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rubel F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger cimate classification updated. Meteorol Z. 2006;15:259-263.

Vidyanandan KV. An overview of factors affecting the performance of solar PV systems. Energy Scan. 2017;27:2-8.

Branker K, Pathak M, Pearce J. A review of solar PV levelized cost of electricity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011(15):259-263.

Jordan DC, Kurtz SR. Photovoltaic degradation rates-an analytical review: photovoltaic degradation rates. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl. 2013;21(1):12-29.