Increased methane yield from dairy cow manure by co-substrate with Salvinia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this recent study were to examine the partial substitution of dairy cow manure (DCM) with aquatic weed Salvinia molesta (SM). The treatment consisted of replacing DCM with SM at four different levels of SM proportion in the combined substrate: 0%, 9.87%, 18.08%, and 25.02% in terms of volatile solid (VS), respectively. In addition, methane production of different parts of SM and biogas production of digested slurries were also evaluated. The result showed that methane production was increased significantly (p<0.05) by 21.89% and 22.73% in terms of substrate weight and active bio-digester volume with the highest proportion of SM (25.02%) in the combined substrate, with values of 11.86 L/kg and 0.54 L/L, respectively. The ultimate methane yield of the whole plant, shoot system (i.e., the above ground part), and roots of SM were 118.49, 141.14, and 108.76 L/kg VS, respectively. The shoot system of SM had the highest methane yield and crude protein and the lowest ash and lignin concentrations, when compared to the whole plant and root system. As the proportion of SM in the combined substrate increased, so did the biogas production of the digested slurry. Therefore, when SM is used as co-substrate with DCM, the application of post digestion will be beneficial to capture the remaining biogas production of the digested slurry.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Vermiremediation of an invasive and pernicious weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecol Eng. 2016;91:432-440.
Ali MM, Bilal B, Dia N, Youm I, Ndongo M. Modeling the kinetics of methane production from slaughter house waste and Salvinia molesta: batch digester operating at ambient temperature. Energy Power. 2018;8(3):61-70.
Syaichurrozi I. Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics. Renew Energy. 2018;15:76-86.
Li Y, Zhao J, Krooneman J, Euverink GJ. Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755: 142940.
Sutaryo, Ward AJ, Møller HB. Ammonia inhibition in thermophilic anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle manure. J Indones Trop Anim Agric. 2014;39(2):83-90.
Sutaryo S, Ward AJ, Møller HB. The effect of mixed-enzyme addition in anaerobic digestion on methane yield of dairy cattle manure. Environ Technol. 2014;35(19):2476-2482.
Gaballaha ES, Abomohra AE, Xu C, Elsayeda M, Abdelkadera TK, Lin J, et al. Enhancement of biogas production from rape straw using different co-pretreatment techniques and anaerobic co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour Technol. 2020;309:123311.
Sutaryo S, Adiwinarti R, Sudrajad MA, Sari TYK, Khayati LN, Ward AJ, et al. Enhancing methane production of dairy cow manure by co-digestion with modified cassava flour waste water. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2021;33(60):3377.
Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK. Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2003;82:1-33.
Møller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring BK. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fraction of manure. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;26:485-495.
Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;4:540-555.
Saputra F, Sutaryo S, Purnomoadi A. Utilization of tofu cake as co-substrate to produce biogas. J Apl Teknol Pangan. 2018;7(3):117-121.
Møller HB, Moset V, Brask M, Weisbjerg MR, Lund P. Feces composition and manure derived methane yield from dairy cows: influence of diet with focus on fat supplement and roughage type. Atmos Environ. 2014;94:36-43.
Gelegenis L, Georgakakis D, Angelidaki I, Mavris V, Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure. Renew Energ. 2007;32:2147-2160.
Sutaryo S, Sempana AN, Lestari CMS, Ward AJ. Performance comparison of single-and two-phase biogas digesters treating dairy cattle manure at tropical ambient temperature. Trop J Anim Sci. 2020;43(4):354-359.
American Public Health Association. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water. 19th ed. Washington DC: APHA; 1996.
Haug RT. The practical handbook of composting engineering. 1st ed. Florida: Lewis Publisher:1993.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583-359.
Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistic procedure for agriculture experiment. 2nd ed. New Jersey: JOHN WILEY & SONS; 1984.
Bhui I, Mathew AK, Chaudhury S, Balachandran S. Influence of volatile fatty acids in different inoculum to substrate ratio and enhancement of biogas production using water hyacinth and salvinia. Bioresour Technol. 2018;270:409-415.
Mathew AK, Bhui I, Banerjee SN, Goswami R, Chakraborty AK, Shome A, et al. Biogas production from locally available aquatic weeds of santiniketan through anaerobic digestion. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2015;17:1681-1688.
Rijal M. Study morphology of Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta. J Biol Educ. 2014;3(2):94-105.
Mauseth JD. Plant anatomy. 1st ed. Menlo Park: Benjamin-Cummings Publ. Co.;1988.
Dong l, Cao G, Guo X, Liu, T, Wu J, Ren N. Efficient biogas production from cattle manure in a plug flow reactor: a large scale long term study. Biorsour Technol. 2019;278:450-455.
Møller HB, Nielsen AM, Nakakubo R, Olsen HJ. Process performance of biogas digesters incorporating pre-separated manure. Livest Sci. 2007;112:217-223.
Schievano A, Pognani M, D’Imporzano G, Adani F. Predicting anaerobic biogasifigasication potential of ingestates and digestates of a full-scale biogas plant using chemical and biological parameters. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8112-8117.
Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2003;109:95-105.
Bruni E, Jensen AP, Angelidaki I. Steam treatment of digested biofibers for increasing biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:7668-7671.
Yenigün O, Demirel B. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem. 2013;48: 901-911.