The implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the processing industry Tofu: A case study of Konawe Selatan district, Indonesia

Main Article Content

Dhian Herdhiansyah
Septiana A. Sari
Sakir Sakir
Asriani Asriani

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact on the environment caused by the production of tofu using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method in the tofu processing industry in the South Konawe Regency, Indonesia. The research location was determined purposively. The research subjects were the parties involved in the research, namely processing industry voters, while the object in this study was tofu processing using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. Data collection was carried out by interview and documentation methods. The results showed that the total greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from the life cycle of 1 kg of tofu products were 1.4343 kg CO2-eq. The emission value is due to the input inventory at the transportation stage, the extraction of soybean raw materials, which is the main cause for tofu products producing high emissions compared to other inventory results. The scenario for improvement at the transportation stage is to substitute fuel oil (BBM) with gas fuel (BBG) for truck, pick-up, and motorbike transportation. Improvement scenarios at the tofu processing stage, including the utilization of tofu liquid waste biogas, replacing the furnace with a boiler, and reducing electricity consumption for washing soybeans. Through the application of these alternatives will have the potential to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG).

Article Details

How to Cite
Herdhiansyah, D., Sari, S. A., Sakir, S., & Asriani, A. (2022). The implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the processing industry Tofu: A case study of Konawe Selatan district, Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 27(04), APST–27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2022.57
Section
Research Articles

References

Irwan AW. Cultivation of soybean plant (Glycine max (L.) Merill) [dissertation]. Bandung: Padjadjaran University; 2006.

Pratama I. The Influence of capital structure and profitability on firm value with managerial ownership as moderating. E-Journal of Accounting. 2016;15(3):1796-1825.

Vidergar P, Perc M, Lukman RK. A survey of the life cycle assessment of food supply chains. J Clean Prod. 2021;286:125506.

Kartikawati R, Susilawati HL, Ariani M, Setyanto P. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation technology from rice fields. Agroinnovation. 2011;3423:7-12.

The Verification Research. Law concerning enviornmental management Law. No. 23 of 1997 [Internet]. London: Charity Commission for England and Wales; 1986. [cited 2020 Mar 15]. Avaialable from: http://www.vertic.org/media/National%20Legislation/Indonesia/ID_Law_Environmntal_Management.pdf.

Saputra F, Sutaryo S, Purnomoadi A. Utilization of solid waste in tofu industry as co-substrate for biogas utilization of tofu cake production as co-substrate in biogas production. J Appl Technol Food. 2018;7(3):117-121.

Saenab S, Muhdar MH, Rohman F, Arifin AN. Utilization of tofu industry liquid waste as liquid organic fertilizer (POC) to support Makassar City Taman (loose) program. J Islam Sci. 2018;4(1):31-38.

Effendi R. Production in Islam. 7th ed. Yogyakarta: Magistra Insani Press; 2003.

MetCalf E. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Companies; 2003.

Rosyidah M. Analysis of Musi river water pollution due to industrial activities. Redox J. 2018;3(1):21-32.

Wahyudi J. Application of life cycle assessment to measure greenhouse gas emissions from tofu production activities. In: Rahayu HS, Setiyo M, Rusdjijati R, Purwandari S, Pambuko ZB, Raja CBE, et al, editors. The 6th University Research Colloquium; 2017 Sep 9; Magelang, Indonesia. Magelang: Unimma Press; 2017. p. 475-480.

Mattson B, Sonesson U. Environmentally-friendly food processing. 1st ed. Cambridge: Woohead Publishing Limited; 2003.

Bare JC. Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2010;12(4):341-351.

Bare JC, Gloria TP. Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(4):1104-1113.

Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Rydberg T, et al. Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environ Int. 2004;30(5):721-739.

Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, et al. Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int. 2004;30(5):701-720.

Suh S, Lenzen M, Treloar GJ, Hondo H, Horvath A, Huppes G, et al. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ Sci Technolo. 2004;38(3):657-664.

Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2008;13(4):290-300.

Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-part 2 impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2008;13(5):374-388.

Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinee J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag. 2009;91(1):1-21.

Earles JM, Halog A. Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2011;16(5):445-453.

Garrigues E, Corson MS, Angers DA, Werf HMG, Walter C. Soil quality in life cycle assessment: towards development of an indicator. Ecol Indic. 2012;18:434-442.

Johnsen FM, Løkke S. Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18:840-849.

Kounina A, Margni M, Bayart JB, Boulay AM, Berger M, Bulle C, et al. Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18(3):707-721.

Hellweg S, Canals LM. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Sci. 2014;344(6188):1109-1113.

Klinglmair M, Sala S, Brandão M. Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19(3):580-592.

Bolin CA, Smith ST. Life cycle assessment of pentachlorophenol-treated wooden utility poles with comparisons to steel and concrete utility poles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(5):2475-2486.

Cho YS, Kim JH, Hong SU, Kim Y. LCA application in the optimum design of high rise steel structures. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(5):3146-3153.

Lee K, Tae S, Shin S. Development of a life cycle assessment program for building (SUSB-LCA) in South Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(8):1994-2002.

Sharma A, Saxena A, Sethi M, Shree V, Varun. Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(1):871-875.

Buyle M, Braet J, Audenaert A. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:379-388.

Zhang X, Shen L, Zhang L. Life cycle assessment of the air emissions during building construction process: a case study in Hong Kong. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;17:160-169.

Cabeza LF, Rincón L, Vilariño V, Pérez G, Castell A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;29:394-416.

Islam H, Jollands M, Setunge S. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:129-140.

Chauhan MK, Varun, Chaudhary S, Kumar S, Samar. Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(7):3445-3453.

García GS, Luo L, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Huppes G. Life cycle assessment of flax shives derived second generation ethanol fueled automobiles in Spain. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(8):1922-1933.

Faria R, Marques P, Moura P, Freire F, Delgado J, Almeida AT. Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;24:271-287.

Luo L, Voet E, Huppes G. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(6-7):1613-1619.

Hou J, Zhang P, Yuan X, Zheng Y. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean, jatropha and microalgae in China conditions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(9):5081-5091.

Rehl T, Lansche J, Müller J. Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas-attributional vs. consequential approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(6):3766-3775.

Wiloso EI, Heijungs R, Snoo GR. LCA of second generation bioethanol: a review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(7):5295-5308.

Lopes Silva DA, Delai I, Delgado Montes ML, Roberto Ometto A. Life cycle assessment of the sugarcane bagasse electricity generation in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;32:532-547.

Rocha MH, Capaz RS, Lora EES, Nogueira LAH, Leme MMV, Renó MLG, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: a meta-analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;37:435-459.

Morales M, Quintero J, Conejeros R, Aroca G. Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: environmental impacts and energy balance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:1349-1361.

Tabata T, Torikai H, Tsurumaki M, Genchi Y, Ukegawa K. Life cycle assessment for co-firing semi-carbonized fuel manufactured using woody biomass with coal: a case study in the central area of Wakayama, Japan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(6):2772-2778.

Sherwani AF, Usmani JA, Varun. Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(1):540-544.

Sumper A, García RM, Robles VR, Jané BJ, Peiró AJ. Life-cycle assessment of a photovoltaic system in Catalonia (Spain). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011;15(8):3888-3896.

Peng J, Lu L, Yang H. Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;19:255-274.

Parisi ML, Maranghi S, Basosi R. The evolution of the dye sensitized solar cells from Grätzel prototype to up-scaled solar applications: a life cycle assessment approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;39:124-138.

Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Lo Brano V. Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;12(1):200-217.

Tremeac B, Meunier F. Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(8):2104-2110.

Arvesen A, Hertwich EG. Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: a review of present knowledge and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(8):5994-6006.

Rashedi A, Sridhar I, Tseng KJ. Life cycle assessment of 50 MW wind firms and strategies for impact reduction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;21:89-101.

Bayer P, Rybach L, Blum P, Brauchler R. Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:446-463.

Varun Bhat IK, Prakash R. LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(5):1067-1073.

Turconi R, Boldrin A, Astrup T. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;28:555-565.

Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, Alessandro F, Scrucca F. Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: review and results harmonization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:1113-1122.

Irawati DY, Andrian D. Analysis of environmental impact on utilization of drinking water treatment plants (IPAM) the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. J Tek Ind. 2018;19(2):166-174 .

Tunggadewo R. LCA (life cycle assessment) paper production from sugar cane drugs [dissertation]. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute; 2013.

Wiyandani SNW. Efficiency analysis of production process layout case studies at PT. Madukismo Kasihan Bantul new honey sugar factory Yogyakarta [dissertation]. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University; 2008.

Environmental Protection Agnecy. Life cycle assessment: inventory guidelines and principles. 1st ed. Ohio: Battelle, and Franklin Associates, ltd.; 1993.

The European Committee for Standardization. Environmental management-life cycle assessment- principles and framework. 1st ed. London: The British Standards Institution; 1997.

The European Committee for Standardization. Environmental management-life cycle impact assessment-goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. 1st ed. London: The British Standards Institution; 1998.

The European Committee for Standardization. Environmental management-life cycle impact assessment-life cycle impact assessment. 1st ed. London: The British Standards Institution; 2000.

The European Committee for Standardization. Environmental management-life cycle impact assessment-principles and framework. 1st ed. London: The British Standards Institution; 2006.

Perou N, editor. Environmental management–life cycle impact assessment–requirements and guidelines. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO); 2006.

Bare JC. Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2010;12(4):341-351.

Pryshlakivsky J, Searcy C. Fifteen years of ISO 14040: a review. J Clean Prod. 2013;57:115-123.

Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan RBH, Christiansen K, Klüppel HJ. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2006;11:80-85.

Harjanto TR, Fahrurrozi M, Bendiyasa IM. Assessment of the cement life cycle of PT holcim Indonesia Tbk. factory cilacap plant: comparison between coal and biomass fuels. J Rek Pros. 2012;6(2):51-58.

Brader M. Greenhouse gases, CO2, CO2e, and carbon: what do all these terms mean? Ecometrica. 2012:1-3.

Kurniawati SD, Supartono W, Suyantohadi A. Life cycle assessment on a small scale tofu industry in Baturetno village-Bantu District-Yogyakarta. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;365:012066.

Mejia A, Harwatt H, Siegl KJ, Sranacharoenpong K, Soret S, Sabaté J. Greenhouse gas emissions generated by tofu production: a case study. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2018;13(1):131-142.

Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT) [Internet]. Jakarta: The Agency; c1978 [cited 2020 Mar 3]. Tofu-tempe waste treatment technology using anaerobic and aerobic biofilter processes. Available at: http://www.enviro.bppt.go.id.

Pertiwiningrum, A. Biogas installation [dissertation]. Yogyakarta; Gadjah Mada University; 2015.

Rahayu ES, Maharani DF, Pujiana DI, editors Tofu production process technology. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Kanisius; 2012.

Hartanto A, Susanti V, Subekti RA, Saputra HM, Rijanto E, Hapid A. Conversion program from BBM to CNG for vehicles. 1st ed. Bandung: LIPI; 2010.

Ifdolhy M. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of tempe products (case study: Rumah tempe Indonesia, Bogor, West Java) [thesis]. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural Institute; 2018.