Rotation invariant binary gradient contour for geographic object-based image analysis

Main Article Content

Sarun Apichontrakul
Rasamee Suwanweerakamtorn

Abstract

This study proposed a modified rotation invariant texture descriptor based on Binary Gradient Contour (BGC1) for land cover classification under Geographic Object-based Image Analysis (GEOBIA). The modified texture descriptor’s performance was tested with 6 machine learning algorithms and a high-resolution Theos satellite image of the area of the city of Khon Kaen. The satellite image was segmented into 9,929 homogeneous land cover objects, of which, 5,417 objects were labeled as one of the ten land cover classes and validated using the 5-Fold cross validation method. The overall accuracy, the individual class F1-Scores, and the computational efficiency of the classification models, which used rotation invariant BGC1Rot, were compared with models, which had used GLCM, LBP variations, and the original BGC1. The results showed that among the 6 classifiers, Random Forest (RF) had produced the best overall accuracy. The model with RF and BGC1Rot had produced the best overall accuracy at 84.863%, which was significantly higher than the original BGC1, and was the highest F1-score for 6 out of 10 investigated land cover classes. During the feature extraction step, the more computationally efficient BGC1Rot was also found to process 4.48 times faster than GLCM. When compared to the widely accepted Uniform LBPUni, BGC1Rot provided an overall accuracy and an average F1-Score that were slightly better with a similar computation time. Thus, the proposed BGC1Rot has been proven to be an effective texture descriptor for GEOBIA based on overall and individual class accuracy, as well as on computational efficiency.

Article Details

How to Cite
Apichontrakul, S., & Suwanweerakamtorn, R. (2022). Rotation invariant binary gradient contour for geographic object-based image analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 27(04), APST–27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2022.64
Section
Research Articles

References

Ma L, Li M, Ma X, Cheng L, Du P, Liu Y. A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2017;130:277-293.

Hay GJ, Castilla G. Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): a new name for a new discipline. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ, editors. Object-based image analysis. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2008. p.75-89.

Momeni R, Aplin P, Boyd DS. Mapping complex urban land cover from spaceborne imagery: the influence of spatial resolution, spectral band set and classification approach. Remote Sens. 2016;8(2):88.

Bhaskaran S, Paramananda S, Ramnarayan M. Per-pixel and object-oriented classification methods for mapping urban features using Ikonos satellite data. Appl Geogr. 2010;30(4):650-65.

Azofeifa SGA, Sinkwich JD, Kang KK. Object-based and pixel-based classification comparison of high-resolution quickbird data in forested alberta [Internet]. Alberta: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; 2014 [cited 2021 June 1]. Availale from: http://www.abmi.ca/dam/jcr:f61e944d-9be3-48da-bf2a-25bf982

dcc19/20056_ABMI_2004_Quickbird_Report.pdf.

Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Kelly M, Lang S, Hofmann P, Addink E, et al. Geographic object-based image analysis-towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2014;87(100):180-191.

Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. Media Commum. 1973;3(6):610-621.

Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Harwood D. Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions. The 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition; 1994; Oct 9-13, Jerusalem, Israel. California: IEEE; 1994. p. 582-585.

Fernández A, Álvarez MX, Bianconi F. Image classification with binary gradient contours. Opt Lasers Eng. 2011;49(9-10):1177-1184.

Fernández A, Álvarez MX, Bianconi F. Texture description through histograms of equivalent patterns. J Math Imaging Vis. 2013;45(1):76-102.

Song C, Yang F, Li P. Rotation invariant texture measured by local binary pattern for remote sensing image classification. 2010 Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science; 2010 Mar 6-7; Wuhan, China. California: IEEE; 2010. p.3-6.

Aguilar MA, Fernández A, Aguilar FJ, Bianconi F, Lorca AG. Classification of urban areas from geoeye-1 imagery through texture features based on histograms of equivalent patterns. Eur J Remote Sens. 2016;49(1):93-120.

Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Mäenpää T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE PAMI. 2002;24(7):971-987.

Wang L, He DC. Texture classification using texture spectrum. Pattern Recognit. 1990;23(8):905-910.

Villa P. Imperviousness indexes performance evaluation for mapping urban areas using remote sensing data. 2007 Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event; 2007 Apr 11-13; Paris, France. California: IEEE; 2007. p. 1-5.

Rouse JW, Haas R, Schell J, Deering D. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. 1974;1:1-9.

McFeeters SK. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens. 1996;17(7):1425-1432.

Chen Y, Su W, Li J, Sun Z. Hierarchical object oriented classification using very high resolution imagery and LIDAR data over urban areas. Adv Space Res. 2009;43(7):1101-1110.

Huete AR. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ. 1988;25(3):295-309.

Mhangara P, Odindi J, Kleyn L, Remas H. Road extraction using object oriented classification [Internet]. California: WorldPress; 2005 [cited 2021 Jun 15].

Available from: http://www.ee.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Legacy/posit11/PositionIT_nov-dec11-Vis_45-50.pdf.

Kumar M, Singh R, Raju P, Krishnamurthy Y. Road network extraction from high resolution multispectral satellite imagery based on object oriented techniques. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2014;2(8):107-110.

Johnson B, Bragais M, Endo I, Macandog MD, Macandog P. Image segmentation parameter optimization considering within- and between-segment heterogeneity at multiple scale levels: test case for mapping residential areas using landsat imagery. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 2015;4(4):2292.

Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Clarke GS, Weng Q. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115(5):1145-1161.

Trimble Germany GmbH [Internet]. Munich: The Incorporation; 1978 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. eCognition 9.0

Available from: http://www.gisat.cz/images/upload/9c230_releasenotes.pdf.

Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J. CORINE land cover technical guide: Addendum 2000. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency; 2000 May. Technical report No 40.

Too JW. Machine Learning Toolbox [Internet]. California: GitHub, Inc.;2022. [cited 2020 Jun 16]. Available from https://github.com/JingweiToo/Machine-Learning-Toolbox.

Lopez FH, Ek AR, Bauer ME. Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method. Remote Sens Environ. 2001;77(3):251-274.

Fisher RA. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen. 1936;7(2):179-188.

Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I. A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2009;11(5):352-359.

Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32.

Stone M. Cross‐validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1974;36(2):111-133.

Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H. Cross-validation. In: Liu L, ÖZsu MT, editors. Encyclopedia of database systems. 1st ed. Massachusetts: Springer US; 2009. p. 532-538.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2009.

Chinchor N. MUC-4 evaluation metrics. The 4th Conference on Message understanding (MUC-4); 1992 Jun 16-18; Virginia, United States. California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1992. p. 22-29.

Sasaki Y. The truth of the F-measure [Internet]. [accessed 2021 May 26]

Available from: https://www.cs.odu.edu/~mukka/cs795sum09dm/Lecturenotes/Day3/F-measure-YS-26Oct07.pdf.