Effects of partially replacing sand with laterite on compressive strength of hybrid OPC -activated metakaolin concrete

Main Article Content

Feyidamilola Faluyi
Chinwuba Arum
Catherine M. Ikumapayi
Stephen A. Alabi

Abstract

This study focused on the effects of replacing sand with laterite on the compressive strength of concrete produced by hybridizing ordinary portland cement (OPC) and activated metakaolin (AMk) as binder. The AMk binder was produced by activating metakaolin with a combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate alkaline solution, which was then used to substitute OPC at 10%, 20% and 30% levels. Laterite was also used to replace sand at 10%, 20% and 30%. Control specimens with 0% laterite and 100% OPC were also cast which served as control. A mix ratio of 1:2:4 binder to fine aggregate to coarse aggregate by weight was used. The resulting concrete specimens were cured for 7, 28, 56 and 91 days in water and the compressive strength determined at the maturity ages. A maximum compressive strength of 23.6 N/mm2 obtained was for the control specimen at 91 days. Laterized concrete (without AMk) at 30% replacement level of sand attained a maximum compressive strength of 22.5 N/mm2, which is 95.3% of the control at the same curing age of 91 days. The maximum strength obtained for OPC-AMk hybrid concrete was 19.8 N/mm2 at 10% AMk and 30% laterite replacement of OPC and sand respectively, representing 84% of the compressive strength of the reference concrete. From the outcome, the optimal laterite content was 30% with 10% AMk. It was also revealed that partial replacement of sand with laterite gives better compressive strength results for hybrid OPC - AMk concrete than with just OPC concrete.

Article Details

How to Cite
Faluyi, F., Arum, C., Ikumapayi, C. M., & Alabi, S. A. (2023). Effects of partially replacing sand with laterite on compressive strength of hybrid OPC -activated metakaolin concrete. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 28(06), APST–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2023.90
Section
Research Articles

References

McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, Riessen A, Corder GD. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. J Cleaner Prod. 2011;19:1080-1090.

Marczyk J, Ziejewska C, Gadek S, Korniejenko K, Łach M, Góra M, et al. Hybrid materials based on fly ash, metakaolin, and cement for 3d printing. Mater. 2021;14:6874.

Rivera J, Mejia J, Mejia R, Gordillo M. Hybrid cement based on the alkali activation of by-products of coal. Rev Constr. 2014;13(2):31-39.

Askarian M, Tao Z, Samali B. Mechanical properties of ambient cured one-part hybrid opc-geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018;186:330-337.

Kumar DP, Jeevetha T, NirmaKumar K, Nandhini N, Vijayashanthy S. Mechanical properties of OPC - geocement. Concr Int J Recent Tech Eng. 2019;8(4):3733-3736.

Hasan M, Saidi T, Husaini H. Properties and microstructure of composite cement paste with diatomaceous earth powder (DEP) from Aceh Besar district – Indonesia. Asia Pac J Sci Tech. 2021;27(01):1-11.

Dhir RK, Ghataora GS, Lynn CJ. Concrete-related applications. In: Dhir RK, editor. Sustainable Construction Materials. 1st ed. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 111-158.

Gonzalez-Fonteboa B, Lopez-Gayarre F, Vera-Agulla J, Casado M, Medina C. Real-scale applications of waste in cement-based materials in building. In: Brito JD, Thomas C, Agrera F, editors. Waste and Byproducts in Cement-Based Materials. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2021. p. 681-713.

Alexander SJ, Godwin A, Alexander S. Study on partial replacement of fine aggregate with red soil in concrete. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Tech. 2016;4(V):138-145.

Singh N, Mithulraj M, Arya S. Influence of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates replacement on various properties of concretes: A review. Res Con Rec. 2018;138:257-271.

Siddique R, Kunal AM. Utilization of industrial by-products and natural ashes in mortar and concrete development of sustainable construction materials. In: Harries KA, Sharma B, editors. Non-conventional and Vernacular Construction Materials. 2nd ed. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead publishing; 2020. p. 247-303.

Joy JS, Mathew M. Experimental study on geopolymer concrete with partial replacement of fine aggregate with foundry sand. Int J Adv Tech Eng Sci. 2015;3(1):559-568.

Lu J, Poon C. Recycling of waste glass in construction materials. In: Brito J, Agrela F, editors. New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 153-167.

Harrison E, Berenjian A, Seifan M. Recycling of waste glass as aggregate in cement-based materials. Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2020;4:100064.

Udoeyo FF, Udeme HI, Odim O. Strength performance of laterized concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2006;20(10):1057-1062.

Saichand G, Harshitha MR. Study of concrete by replacement of lateritic soil as a partial replacement in the fine aggregate. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Tech. 2019;7(IV):153.

Manu V, Srivathsa HU. Study on concrete properties by partially replacing cement by metakaolin and fine aggregate by lateraite soil. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2017;6(2):1463-1469.

Ashwin S, Aishwarya BR, Praveen HR, Shwetha N, Adarsh U. An experimental study on concrete with partial replacement of fine aggregates by laterite sand. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. (2017;6(5):8732-8737.

Muthusamy K, Kamaruzaman NW. Assessment of Malaysian Laterite Aggregate in Concrete. Int J Civ Environ Eng. 2012;12(04):83-86.

Karra RC, Raghunandan ME, Manjunath B. Partial replacement of fine aggregates with laterite in GGBS blended-Concrete. Adv concr constr. 2016;4(3):221-230.

Ewa DE, Ukpata JO, Egbe EA,Akeke GA. Physical properties of sandcrete-laterite blocks. Int J Mech Civ Eng. 2022;5(1):1-9.

Siddharth K, Lakshmi PT, Vishnu RA. Experimental studies of geopolymer mortar with fine aggregate partially replaced by crushed laterite. Int Res J Eng Techno. 2016;103(12):98.

British Standards Institution. BS EN 197-1:2000. Cement, composition, specification and conformity criteria for common cement [internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: http://bqw.csstgc.com.cn /userfiles/f5ab408a6cfa42859983154ab85f56c0/files/teckSolution/2020/05/BS%20EN%20197-1-2000.pdf.

ASTM International. ASTM C618-12a (2014). Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcinated natural pozzolan for use in concrete [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.ast m.org/Standards/C618-12a.htm.

British Standards Institution. BS EN 12620:2002. Specification for aggregates from natural sources for concrete [internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: www.bsi-global.com/BS EN 12620:2002.

ASTM International. ASTM C136/C136M-19 (2019). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Coarse and Fine Aggregates [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standard s/C136M-19.htm.

Adeola AJ, Oyebola AM. Mineralogy and geochemistry of the weathering profiles above the basement rocks in Idi- Ayunre and Akure Districts, Southwestern Nigeria. J Geogr Geol. 2016;8(2):15-29.

British Standards Institution. BS EN 1008:2002. Mixing Water for Concrete - Specification for Sampling, Testing and Assessing the Suitability of Water, Including Water Recovered from Processes in the Concrete Industry as Mixing Water for Concrete [internet]. 2008 [cited 2022 May 24]. Available from: www.bsi-global.com/BS EN 1008:2002.

British Standards Institution. BS5328-2:1997. Methods for specifying concrete mixes [internet]. 2002 [cited 2022 August 3]. Available from: www.bsi-global.com/BS5328-2:1997.

Sharma A, Ahmad J. Factors affecting compressive strength of geopolymer concrete-a review. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2017;4(01):1536.

Hardjito D, Rangan BV. Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology; 2005.

Aldin Z, Nedeljkovic M, Lukovic M, Liu J, Blom K, Ye G, editors. Optimization of a geopolymer mixture for a reinforced cantilever concrete bench. 9th international symposium on cement and concrete. 31 Oct-3 Nov 2017; Wuhan, China. Wuhan: ISCC; 2017.

Hammat S, Menad B, Kenai S, Thomas C, Kirgiz MS, Sousa Galdino AG. The effect of content and fineness of natural pozzolana on the rheological, mechanical, and durability properties of self-compacting mortar. J Build Eng. 2021;44:103276.

Gorhan G, Aslaner R, Sinik O. The effect of curing on the properties of metakaolin and fly ash-based geopolymer paste. J Compositesb. 2016; 97:329-335.

Belaidi SE, Azzouz L, Kadri EH, Kenai S. Effect of natural pozzolana and marble powder on the properties of self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2012;31:251-257.