Effect of organic loading rate on reactor performance during anaerobic digestion of starch production wastewater

Main Article Content

Chayanon Sawatdeenarunat

Abstract

The long-term monitoring on an anaerobic digestion of cassava starch wastewater (CSW) using completely stirred tank reactor was performed for more than 260 days. The optimum operating organic loading rate (OLR) was 2.58 kg COD/m3/d with pH, total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, and VFA/alkalinity of 6.95±0.10, 618.30±37.30 mg/L as acetic acid, and 0.28±0.09, respectively. However, the reactors showed the signs of failure when operated at the final OLR of 2.96 kg COD/m3/d. The pH significantly dropped resulting from accumulating VFA in the system. At the operating OLR of 2.58 kg COD/m3/d, oxidation reduction potentials of the systems were in the effective range of methanogenesis stage. Total chemical oxygen demand and volatile solid removal were high as 80.85±1.37%, and 79.32±2.93%, respectively. Methane yield was reported to be 0.48±0.04 NL/gVSadded. Finally, the failure reactors were recovered, and the results could confirm the optimum operating OLR of 2.58 kg COD/m3/d. Anaerobic co-digestion between starch wastewater and high-nutrient substrate could enhance the efficiency of the system. In addition, the biorefinery technology to produced high value bioproducts such as bioplastics and to use in biological nutrient removal process might be appropriate challenges to enhance the economic viability of the AD of CSW.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sawatdeenarunat, C. (2022). Effect of organic loading rate on reactor performance during anaerobic digestion of starch production wastewater. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 27(06), APST–27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2022.92
Section
Research Articles

References

Energy Policy and Plannig Office. Alternative energy development plan : AEDP2015 [Internet]. Bangkok; Ministry of Energy; 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 1]. Available from: http://www.eppo.go.th/images/POLICY/ENG/

AEDP2015ENG.pdf.

Jingura RM, Kamusoko R. Methods for determination of biomethane potential of feedstocks: a review. Biofuel Res J. 2017;4(2):573-586.

Kumar P, Samuchiwal S, Malik A. Anaerobic digestion of textile industries wastes for biogas production. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2020;10(5):715-724.

Cheah YK, Antich VC, Dosta J, Álvarez MJ. Volatile fatty acid production from mesophilic acidogenic fermentation of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under acidic and alkaline pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(35):35509-35522.

Papong S, Rotwiroon P, Chatchupong T, Malakul P. Life cycle energy and environmental assessment of bio-CNG utilization from cassava starch wastewater treatment plants in Thailand. Renew Energy. 2014;65:64-69.

Tonrangklang P, Therdyothin A, Preechawuttipong I. Overview of biogas production potential from industry sector to produce compressed bio-methane gas in Thailand. Energy Procedia. 2017;138:919-924.

Rajbhandari BK, Annachhatre AP. Anaerobic ponds treatment of starch wastewater: case study in Thailand. Bioresour Technol. 2004;95(2):135-143.

Hansupalak N, Piromkraipak P, Tamthirat P, Manitsorasak A, Siroth K, Tran T. Biogas reduces the carbon footprint of cassava starch: a comparative assessment with fuel oil. J Clean Prod. 2016;134 (part B):539-546.

Jiraprasertwong A, Maitriwong K, Chavadej S. Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Renew Energy. 2019;130:191-205.

Sárvári Horváth I, Tabatabaei M, Karimi K, Kumar R. Recent updates on biogas production - a review. Biofuel Res J. 2016;3(2):394-402.

Baird RB, Eaton AD, Rice EW. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington; 2017.

Anderson GK, Yang G. Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration. Water Environ Res. 1992;64(1):53-59.

Khanal SK. Anaerobic biotechnology for bioenergy production: principles and applications. 1st ed. New Jersey; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008.

Araujo IR., Gomes SD, Tonello TU, Lucas SM, Mari AG, Vargas AJ. Methane production from cassava starch wastewater in packed-bed reactor and continuous flow. J Brazillian Assoc Agric Eng. 2018;38(2):270-276

Leaño EP, Babel S. Effects of pretreatment methods on cassava wastewater for biohydrogen production optimization. Renew Energy. 2012;39(1):339-346.

Sun L, Wan S, Yu Z, Wang Y, Wang S. Anaerobic biological treatment of high strength cassava starch wastewater in a new type up-flow multistage anaerobic reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:280-288.

Kaewkannetra P, Chiwes W, Chiu TY. Treatment of cassava mill wastewater and production of electricity through microbial fuel cell technology. Fuel. 2011;90(8):2746-2750.

Lu X, Zhen G, Estrada AL, Chen M, Ni J, Hojo T, et al. Operation performance and granule characterization of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating wastewater with starch as the sole carbon source. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:264-273.

Vongvichiankul C, Deebao J, Khongnakorn W. Relationship between pH, oxidation reduction potential (orp) and biogas production in mesophilic screw anaerobic digester. Energy Procedia. 2017;138:877-882.

Gerardi MH. The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. New Jersey; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003.

Nguyen D, Wu Z, Shrestha S, Lee PH, Raskin L, Khanal SL. Intermittent micro-aeration: new strategy to control volatile fatty acid accumulation in high organic loading anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2019;166:115080.

Racho P, Pongampornnara A. Enhanced biogas production from modified tapioca starch wastewater. Energy Reports. 2019;6 Suppl 6:744-750.

Elaiyaraju P, Partha N (2012) Biogas production from sago (Tapioca) wastewater using anaerobic batch reactor. Energy Environ. 2012;23(4):631-645.

Braz GHR, Gonzalez FN, Lema JM, Carballa M. Organic overloading affects the microbial interactions during anaerobic digestion in sewage sludge reactors. Chemosphere. 2019;222:323-332.

Cremonez PA, Sampaio SC, Teleken JG, Meier TW, Frigo EW, Rossi E, et al. Effect of substrate concentrations on methane and hydrogen biogas production by anaerobic digestion of a cassava starch-based polymer. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;151:112471.

Antwi P, Li J, Boadi PO, Meng J, Quashie FK, Wang X, et al. Efficiency of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating potato starch processing wastewater and related process kinetics, functional microbial community and sludge morphology. Bioresour Technol. 2017;239:105-116.

Surendra KC, Sawatdeenarunat C, Shrestha S, Sung S, Khanal SK. Anaerobic digestion-based biorefinery for bioenergy and biobased products. Ind Biotechnol. 2015;11(2):103-112.

Sawatdeenarunat C, Nguyen D, Surendra KC, Shrestha S, Rajendran K, Oechsner H, et al. Anaerobic biorefinery: current status, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:304-313

Johansen JE, Bakke R. Enhancing hydrolysis with microaeration. Water Sci Technol 2006;53(8):43-50.

Elefsiniotis P, Wareham DG. Utilization patterns of volatile fatty acids in the denitrification reaction. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;41(1-2):92-97.

Venkateshkumar R, Shanmugam S, Veerappan AR. Experimental investigation on the effect of anaerobic co-digestion of cotton seed hull with cow dung. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2021;11:1255-1262.

Beniche I, Hungría J, Bari HE, Siles JA, Chica AF, Martin FA. Effects of C/N ratio on anaerobic co-digestion of cabbage, cauliflower, and restaurant food waste. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2021;11:2133-2145.