Evaluation of the PV design based on minimum percentage of energy saving

Main Article Content

Settakorn Kamuang
Supalak Sathiracheewin
Srisakdi Jangjitb
Jamorn Doungkunsa

Abstract

In Thailand, the use of photovoltaic (PV) energy technology is growing in popularity in the industrial sector to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the grid. Before the system is installed, the owner must make investment decisions by evaluating the production potential of the PV system. PV sizing is designed using a simplified method under energy-saving circumstances. With the aid of this technique, the engineer can easily design the PV capacity installation and specify PV sizing in the design program. As a case study, power flow assessment was applied to a wastewater treatment system in Sakon Nakhon, Thailand. The results showed that it consumed an average of 3,643 kWh of energy per day and the plant needed to save 10% of this amount of energy annually. Consequently, the optimal capacity for the system was 101 kWp, while the approximate PV sizing was 103.8 kW, depending on factory conditions. The combined energy output of the grid and the PV system was injected into the 950.86 MWh/year electric load. The entire annual energy output from the PV system was 108.24 MWh, with the energy flow from the grid being 842.62 MWh. Based on current (2023) PV market prices, the typical installation cost was THB 27.44/W, with a payback period of 5.3 years. The developed PV system should assist the wastewater treatment plant with predicted yearly energy savings of 11.4%.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamuang, S. ., Sathiracheewin, S., Jangjitb, S., & Doungkunsa, J. . (2024). Evaluation of the PV design based on minimum percentage of energy saving. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 29(04), APST–29. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2024.54
Section
Research Articles

References

Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Thailand. Thailand 20-year energy efficiency development plan (2011 - 2030) [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 7]. Available from https://www.eppo.go.th/index.php/en/policy-and-plan/en-tieb/tieb-eep.

Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Thailand. Alternative energy development plan 2018-2037 (AEDP 2018) [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 8]. Available from https://www.eppo.go.th/index.php/th/conservation/aedp.

Srivastava R, Tiwari AN, Giri VK. An overview on performance of PV plants commissioned at different places in the world. Energy Sustain Dev. 2020;54:51-59.

Muñoz Y, Vargas O, Pinilla G, Vásquez J. Sizing and study of the energy production of a grid-tied photovoltaic system using PVsyst software. Tecciencia. 2017;12(22):27-32.

Jagadale PR, Choudhari AB, Jadhav SS. Design and simulation of grid connected solar Si-poly photovoltaic plant using PVsyst for Pune, India location. Renew Energ Res Appl. 2022;3(1):41-49.

Ahsan S, Javed K, Rana AS, Zeeshan M. Design and cost analysis of 1 kW photovoltaic system based on actual performance in Indian scenario. Perspect Sci. 2016;8:642-644.

Dey D, Subudhi B. Design, simulation and economic evaluation of 90 kW grid connected photovoltaic system. Energ Rep. 2020;6:1778-1787.

Huld T, Müller R, Gambardella A. A new solar radiation database for estimating PV performance in Europe and Africa. Solar Energy. 2012;86(6):1803-1815.

Mermoud A, Wittmer B. PVSYST user’s manual. 1st ed. Geneva: Switzerland; 2014.

Jatoi AR, Samo SR, Jakhrani AQ. Performance evaluation of various photovoltaic module technologies at Nawabshah Pakistan. Int J Renew Energy Dev. 2021;10(1):97-103.

Sathiracheewin S, Prommaneewat K. Short term analysis of PV system performance in different areas of Thailand. The 16th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON); 2019 Jul 10-13; Chonburi, Thailand. New Jersey: IEEE Xplore; 2019. p. 270-273.

Sathiracheewin S, Sripadungtham P, Kamuang S. Performance analysis of grid-connected PV Rooftop, at Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. 2020;5(4):816-823.

Mochi P. Primary review on MPPT method and size of grid connected solar photovoltaic inverter. The 8th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE); 2018 Dec 13-15; Jaipur: India. New Jersey: IEEE Xplore; 2018. p. 1-6.

Ajgaonkar Y, Bhirud M, Rao P. Design of standalone solar PV system using MPPT controller and self-cleaning dual axis tracker. The 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Systems (ICACCS); 2019 Mar 15-16; Coimbatore, India. New Jersey: IEEE Xplore; 2019. p. 27-32.

Barua S, Prasath RA, Boruah D. Rooftop solar photovoltaic system design and assessment for the academic campus using PVsyst software. Int J Electron Electr Eng. 2017;5(1):76-83.

Gurupira T, Rix AJ. Pv simulation software comparisons: Pvsyst, NREL SAM and PVlib. The 25th Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC); 2017 Jan 29 - Feb 1; Cape Town, South Africa. KwaZulu-Natal: Durban Univeristy of Technology; 2017. p. 1-6.