Physiological, Yield, and Fruit Quality Responses of Tomato to Irradiated Carrageenan under Drought Stress
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates the effects of Irradiated Carrageenan Biostimulant (ICB) on fruit yield, quality attributes, biomass allocation, and nutrient assimilation in the commercial tomato hybrid Diamante Max F1 under varying levels of water stress. The experiment, conducted under greenhouse conditions in Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, included five treatments: T1 – moderate (partial) drought with ICB foliar spray (PD + S), T2 – moderate (partial) drought without ICB (PD + US), T3 – severe drought with ICB (SD + S), T4 – severe drought without ICB (SD + US), and T5 – a fully irrigated, unsprayed control (WW + US). Results revealed significant main and interaction effects of water deficit and ICB on multiple plant indicators. Among the treatments, T2 (PD + S) resulted in the highest total dry biomass. Nutrient uptake, specifically nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), showed marked improvement under T1. Drought stress led to an increased root-to-shoot ratio, indicating adaptive allocation toward root development. Yield traits including fruit count, weight, length, and diameter peaked in the PD + S treatment. Furthermore, ICB application enhanced fruit quality parameters such as total soluble solids and titratable acidity particularly under partial drought. These findings suggest that foliar application of ICB under moderate water stress can improve tomato productivity, nutrient uptake, and fruit quality, indicating its potential as a viable biostimulant for drought-resilient tomato cultivation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Cramer GR, Oosterhuis DM, McMichael BL. Effect of water stress on fruit quality. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158(1):1–10.
Thussagunpanit J, Tewathammanaj W, Thongyen P, Manochai B, Chulaka P. Identification of water stress in tomato based on spectral indices and physiological parameters. Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2025;59(4):590415.
Eskin NAM. Tomato fruit ripening and quality. CRC Press; 2000.
Abdel-Aal EI, Haroon AM, Mofeed J. Irradiated carrageenan: preparation and biological applications in agriculture. Radiat Phys Chem. 2015;108:1–7.5.
Nath A, Choudhury A, Maiti PK. Effect of biostimulants on tomato fruit yield and quality. Int J Plant Sci. 2011;12(4):319–325.
Tigist G, Bekele W, Abdi Z. Determination of titratable acidity and its relationship with tomato quality. Food Sci Technol Int. 2013;19(4):324–329.
Imakumbili MLE, Semu E, Semoka JMR, Abass A, Mkamilo G. Managing cassava growth on nutrient-poor soils under different water stress conditions. Heliyon. 2021;7(6):e07331.
Lambeth HW, Lyon MS, Anderson GR. Variation in percent citric acid in tomato accessions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1966;87(5):532–535.
FAO. Fertilizer use by crop in the Philippines. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2005.
AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Washington DC: AOAC; 2005.
Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. 6th ed. Sinauer Associates; 2015.
Jones AP. Tomato pH and its effect on flavor and quality. Int J Food Sci Technol. 1994;29(5):515–520.
Mzibra H, Ben Rejeb K, Fawal M. Influence of seaweed-based biostimulants on the growth, yield, and quality of tomato fruits. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1234.
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185–212.
Rinaldi M, Pizzuto L. Effects of irrigation and soil management on tomato quality and yield. Agric Water Manag. 2009;96(8):1247–1253.
Navarro JM, Flores P, Garrido C. Effects of water stress on growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under greenhouse conditions. Agric Water Manag. 2006;86(1–2):129–134.
Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Photosynthesis under drought stress. Photosynthetica. 2013;51(4):1–14.
Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–681.
Menzel CM, Kriedemann PE. The effect of water stress on tomato quality and shelf life. HortScience. 1995;30(5):1029–1034.
Jackson MB, Davies WJ. The influence of water deficits on the quality of fruits and vegetables. HortScience. 1982;17(5):720–724.
Lang A. Postharvest technology for fruit and vegetables. Int J Postharvest Technol. 2007;2(2):1–15.
Poorter H, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in plant adaptation. Funct Plant Biol. 2000;27(6):595–607.
Wheeler TR, Kay M. Effects of climate change on crop yield and quality in tomato. Field Crops Res. 2013;153:210–220.
Reeve W, Cross S. Effects of various soil treatments on tomato yield and fruit quality. Aust J Agric Res. 1988;39(3):317–322.
Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. 6th ed. Sinauer Associates; 2015.
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185–212.
Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, et al. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28(4):386–399.
Craigie JS. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J Appl Phycol. 2011;23(3):371–393.
Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 2014;383(1–2):3–41.
du Jardin P. Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:3–14.
Rouphael Y, Colla G. Biostimulants in agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:40.
Sharma HS, Fleming C, Selby C, Rao JR, Martin T. Plant biostimulants: a review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts. J Appl Phycol. 2014;26(1):465–490.
Zhang X, Schmidt RE. Hormone-containing products’ impact on antioxidant status of tall fescue. Crop Sci. 2000;40(5):1344–1349.
Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2017;7:2049.
Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 2019;9(6):306.