Comparative modelling of membrane filtration performance using response surface methodology, artificial neural network, and random forest regression: Implications for food and bioprocessing applications
Main Article Content
Abstract
Membrane filtration plays a critical role in the food and bioprocessing industries. Despite its widespread application, accurately predicting membrane performance remains challenging due to the non-linear and inter-dependent influence of multiple operational parameters, including transmembrane pressure (TMP), crossflow velocity (CFV), temperature, pH, and solute concentration. This study evaluates the predictive performance of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF) regression for permeate flux prediction. The models were trained and validated using 46 experimental data points compiled from a published study on water and wastewater filtration. Although derived from a different domain, the underlying flux dynamics and fouling mechanisms are conceptually analogous to those in food and bioprocessing systems, making this dataset a valid proxy for benchmarking model architecture and predictive capability. The RSM model identified TMP and CFV as the most statistically significant predictors and achieved an excellent goodness-of-fit (R2 = 0.9993). The machine learning models also demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with the ANN achieving an R2of 0.995 under cross-validation and the RF model reaching an R2 of 0.933. The ANN effectively captured complex non-linear relationships in the data, whereas the RF model exhibited good generalization capability and interpretability. Collectively, these findings offer a conceptual framework for future membrane modelling applications in food and bioprocessing applications, with predictive accuracy expected to improve as larger, domain-specific datasets become available.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Baker RW. Membrane technology and applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
Judd S. The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier; 2010.
Shahabadi SMS, Reyhani A. Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via the full factorial design methodology. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;132:50-61.
Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2009;170:530-551.
Bowen WR, Welfoot JS. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration—critical assessment and model development. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57:1121-1137.
Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA, Gupta BB. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J Memb Sci. 1995;100:259-272.
Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
Haykin S. Neural networks and learning machines, 3/E. Pearson Education India; 2009.
Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions. Environ Model Softw. 2010;25:891-909.
Molnar C. Interpretable machine learning. Lulu. com; 2020.
Salahi A, Noshadi I, Badrnezhad R, Kanjilal B, Mohammadi T. Nano-porous membrane process for oily wastewater treatment: Optimization using response surface methodology. J Environ Chem Eng. 2013;1:218-225.
Kovacs DJ, Li Z, Baetz BW, Hong Y, Donnaz S, Zhao X, et al. Membrane fouling prediction and uncertainty analysis using machine learning: A wastewater treatment plant case study. J Memb Sci. 2022;660:120817.
Garakani SS, Chew JW. Development of physics-informed machine-learning models to enhance understanding and prediction of membrane fouling. J Memb Sci. 2025:124133.
Jang H, Lee CS, Kim JH, Kim J. Optimization of photocatalytic ceramic membrane filtration by response surface methodology: Effects of hydrodynamic conditions on organic fouling and removal efficiency. Chemosphere 2024;356:141885.
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32.
Owusu Sekyere A, Baidoo MF, Ohemeng-Boahen G, Essandoh HMK. Design optimization of ceramic membrane filters based on a response surface method. Compos Adv Mater. 2024;33:1-19.
Lu Q, Zhang H, Fan R, Wan Y, Luo J. Machine learning-based Bayesian optimization facilitates ultrafiltration process design for efficient protein purification. Sep Purif Technol. 2025;363:132122.
Hengl T, Nussbaum M, Wright MN, Heuvelink GBM, Gräler B. Random forest as a generic framework for predictive modeling of spatial and spatio-temporal variables. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5518.
Wang L, Li Z, Fan J, Lu G, Liu D, Han Z. Prediction of membrane purification by membrane fouling based on mathematic and machine learning models combined with image processing technology. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11:111154.
Eteba A, Bassyouni M, Elzahar MH, El-shekhiby MZ. Development and optimization of biodegradable chitosan-based nanofiltration membranes for effective textile wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 2025;367:132852.
Deng B, Deng Y, Liu M, Chen Y, Wu Q, Guo H. Integrated models for prediction and global factors sensitivity analysis of ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling: statistics and machine learning approach. Sep Purif Technol. 2023;313:123326.
Al-Amoudi AS. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: A review. Desalination. 2010;259:1-10.
Alzahrani S, Mohammad AW. Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review. J Water Proc.engineering. 2014;4:107-133.
Lim SJ, Kim YM, Park H, Ki S, Jeong K, Seo J, et al. Enhancing accuracy of membrane fouling prediction using hybrid machine learning models. Desalination Water Treat. 2019;146:22-28.
Afif M, Aladin N, Kamin Z, Chel-Ken C, Hardyianto Vai Bahrun M, Bono A, et al. Applications of Machine Learning in Modelling and Optimization of Breakthrough Curve Analysis: A Focus on Artificial Neural Network and their Comparison. J Adv Res Comput Appl. 2026;42:69-76.