Biogas production from hydrolysate napier grass by co-digestion with slaughterhouse wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures
Article Sidebar
Keywords:
methane production hydrolysate napier grass slaughterhouse wastewater
Main Article Content
Abstract
Biogas production from co-digestion of hydrolyzed napier grass and slaughterhouse wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures was conducted. Factors influencing methane production was investigated, i.e., initial pH (6, 7, 8) and carbon-nitrogen (C/N) ratio. Optimum conditions were initial pH of 7 and C/N ratio of 3.42. Under these conditions, a methane production (MP), methane production rate (MPR) and methane yield (MY) of 299.69 ml CH4/L, 0.52 ml CH4/L h, and 39.76 ml CH4/g-COD were obtained. Using the optimal conditions, MP, MPR and MY from co-digestion of hydrolyzed napier grass and slaughterhouse wastewater (299.69 ml CH4/L, 0.52 ml CH4/L h and 39.76 ml CH4/g-COD) were 1.82, 1.79 and 2.11 times greater than that of controls (without inoculum addition or self fermentation) (164.63 mL-CH4/L, 0.29 mL-CH4/L h and 18.76 ml CH4/g-COD). The energy production from co-digestion of hydrolyzed napier grass and slaughterhouse wastewater was 11.99 kJ/L.
Article Details
How to Cite
Sittijunda, S. (2015). Biogas production from hydrolysate napier grass by co-digestion with slaughterhouse wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 20(3), 323–336. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/APST/article/view/42637
Section
Research Articles
References
[1] Banks C, Humphreys P. The anaerobic treatment of a lignocel-lulosic substrate offering little natural pH buffering capacity. Water Sci Technol. 1998; 38: 29– 35.
[2] Wang X, Lu X, Li F, Yang G. Effects of temperature and carbon-nitrogen (C/N) tatio on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, chicken manure and rice straw: focusing on ammonia inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e97265.
[3] Sanchez E, Borja R, Weiland P, Travieso L. Effect of temperature and pH on the kinetics of methane production organic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the batch anaerobic digestion process of cattle manure. Bioprocess Engine.2000; 22: 247–52.
[4] Zarkaya IA, Abustan I, Ismail N, Yusoff MS. Production of methane gas from organic fraction municipal solid waste (OFMSW] via anaerobic process: application methodology for Malaysian condition. Int J Environment & Waste Manag. 2013; 12: 121–9.
[5] Zhang T, Liu L, Song Z, Ren G, Feng Y, et al. Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e66845.
[6] Prochazka J, Dolejs P, Maca J, Dohanyos M. Stability and inhibition of anaerobic processes caused by insufficiency or excess of ammonia nitrogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 93: 439–47.
[7] Sirirote P, Promma F, Thanaboripat D. Biogas production from 3 strains of Napier grass.Biofuels biochemicals & bioener. 2014; 31: 97.
[8] Sawasdee V, Pisutpaisal N. Feasibility of biogas production from napier grass. Energy Procedia. 2014; 1229–33.
[9] Wen B, Yuan X, Li QX, Liu J, Ren J, et al. Comparison and evaluation of concurrent saccharification and anaerobic digestion of Napier grass after pretreatment by three microbial consortia. Bioresource Technol. 2015; 175 : 102–11.(10) Vargas JA, Castro RS, Gonzalez RIC, Mondragon FA, Mendez-Acosta HO. Methane production from acid hydrolysates of agave tequilana bagasse: valuation of hydrolysis conditions and methane yield. Bioresour Technol. 2015; 181: 191–9.
[11] Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 120: 78–83.
[12] Wu X, Yao W, Zhu J, Miller C.Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source.Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101: 4042–7.(
[13] Hills DJ. Effects of carbon: nitrogen ratio on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Agr Wastes. 1979; 1: 267–78.(14) Parkin GF, Owen WF. Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges. J Environ Eng. 1986; 112: 867–920.
[15] Angelidaki I, Ahring BK. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: The effect of ammonia. App Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993; 38: 560–4.
[16] Angelidaki I, Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 3(2): 117
[17] Yen H, Burne DE. Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98: 130-134.
[18] Hill DT. A comprehensive dynamic model for animal waste methanogenesis. Trans ASAE. 1982; 25:1374–80.(19) Hansen G. End product inhibition in methane fermentation. Proc Biochem. 1982; 17: 45–9.
[20] Varel VH, Hashimoto AG, Chen YR. Effect of temperature and retention time on methane production from beef cattle waste. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980; 48: 217–22.
[21] Kayhoniam M. Performance of a high-solids anaerobic digestion process under various ammonia concentration. J Chem Tech Biotechnol. 1994; 9: 349–52.
[22] Khamtib S, Plangklang P, Reungsang A. Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production from hydrolysate of microwave assisted sulfuric acid pretreated oil palm trunk by hot spring enriched culture. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2011; 36:14204–16.
[23] Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy JJB, Young LY, McCarty PL. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979; 13:485–93.
[24] Saraphirom P, Reungsang A. Optimization of biohydrogen production from sweet sorghum syrup using statistical methods. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35: 13435–44.
[25] Zheng XJ, Yu HQ. Inhibitory effects of butyrate on biological hydrogen production with mixed anaerobic cultures.J Environ Manage. 2005; 74: 66–70.
[26] Fangkum A, Reungsang A. Biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by elephant dung: Effects of initial pH and substrate concentration. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36: 8687–96.
[27] Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata J, Sluiter DT, et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass [Internet]. 2001 [updated 2011 July; cited 2014 Apr 20] Available from https://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html
[28] Nantapipat J, Luengnaruemitchai A, Wongkasemjit S. A comparison of dilute sulfuric and phosphoric acid pretreatments in biofuel production from corncobs. World Academy of Science Eng & Technol. 2013; 7: xx.
[29] Singh R, Tiwari S, Srivastava M, Shukla A. Performance study of combined microwave and acid pretreatment method for enhancing enzymatic digestibility of rice straw for bioethanol production. Plant Knowledge J. 2013; 2: 157–62.
[30] Mohammad JT, Keikhosro K. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2008; 9: 1621-51.
[31] Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S. Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review Bioresour Technol. 2003; 87: 155–9.
[32] Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hangerdal BH, Linden G, et al. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol & Biotenol. 2007; 82: 340–9.
[33] Vedrenne F, Beline F, Dabert P, Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99: 146–55.
[34] Heo NH, Park SC, Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. Environmental Science Health. 2004; 39: 1739–56.
[35] Kim J, Kang CM. Increased anaerobic production of methane by co-digestion of sludge with microalgal biomass and food waste leachate. Bioresour Technol. In press; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.028
[36] Abouelenien F, Namba Y, Kosseva MR, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2014. 159: 80-7.
[37] Panponga K, Srisuwana G, O- Thong S, Kongjan P. Anaerobic co-digestion of canned seafood wastewater with glycerol waste for enhanced biogas production. Energy Procedia. 2014; 52: 328–36.
[38] Ince BK, Ince O, Anderson GK, Arayici S. Assessment of biogas use as an energy source from anaerobic digestion of brewery wastewater. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 2001; 126: 23.
[39] Van den Berg L, Kennedy KJ. Dairy waste treatment with anaerobic stationary fixed film reactors. Water Science & Technology. 1983; 15: 359–68.
[40] Ince O. Potential energy production from anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater. J Environ Sci Health Part A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 1998; 33: 1219–28.
[2] Wang X, Lu X, Li F, Yang G. Effects of temperature and carbon-nitrogen (C/N) tatio on the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, chicken manure and rice straw: focusing on ammonia inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e97265.
[3] Sanchez E, Borja R, Weiland P, Travieso L. Effect of temperature and pH on the kinetics of methane production organic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the batch anaerobic digestion process of cattle manure. Bioprocess Engine.2000; 22: 247–52.
[4] Zarkaya IA, Abustan I, Ismail N, Yusoff MS. Production of methane gas from organic fraction municipal solid waste (OFMSW] via anaerobic process: application methodology for Malaysian condition. Int J Environment & Waste Manag. 2013; 12: 121–9.
[5] Zhang T, Liu L, Song Z, Ren G, Feng Y, et al. Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e66845.
[6] Prochazka J, Dolejs P, Maca J, Dohanyos M. Stability and inhibition of anaerobic processes caused by insufficiency or excess of ammonia nitrogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 93: 439–47.
[7] Sirirote P, Promma F, Thanaboripat D. Biogas production from 3 strains of Napier grass.Biofuels biochemicals & bioener. 2014; 31: 97.
[8] Sawasdee V, Pisutpaisal N. Feasibility of biogas production from napier grass. Energy Procedia. 2014; 1229–33.
[9] Wen B, Yuan X, Li QX, Liu J, Ren J, et al. Comparison and evaluation of concurrent saccharification and anaerobic digestion of Napier grass after pretreatment by three microbial consortia. Bioresource Technol. 2015; 175 : 102–11.(10) Vargas JA, Castro RS, Gonzalez RIC, Mondragon FA, Mendez-Acosta HO. Methane production from acid hydrolysates of agave tequilana bagasse: valuation of hydrolysis conditions and methane yield. Bioresour Technol. 2015; 181: 191–9.
[11] Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 120: 78–83.
[12] Wu X, Yao W, Zhu J, Miller C.Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source.Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101: 4042–7.(
[13] Hills DJ. Effects of carbon: nitrogen ratio on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Agr Wastes. 1979; 1: 267–78.(14) Parkin GF, Owen WF. Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges. J Environ Eng. 1986; 112: 867–920.
[15] Angelidaki I, Ahring BK. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: The effect of ammonia. App Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993; 38: 560–4.
[16] Angelidaki I, Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 3(2): 117
[17] Yen H, Burne DE. Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98: 130-134.
[18] Hill DT. A comprehensive dynamic model for animal waste methanogenesis. Trans ASAE. 1982; 25:1374–80.(19) Hansen G. End product inhibition in methane fermentation. Proc Biochem. 1982; 17: 45–9.
[20] Varel VH, Hashimoto AG, Chen YR. Effect of temperature and retention time on methane production from beef cattle waste. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980; 48: 217–22.
[21] Kayhoniam M. Performance of a high-solids anaerobic digestion process under various ammonia concentration. J Chem Tech Biotechnol. 1994; 9: 349–52.
[22] Khamtib S, Plangklang P, Reungsang A. Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production from hydrolysate of microwave assisted sulfuric acid pretreated oil palm trunk by hot spring enriched culture. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2011; 36:14204–16.
[23] Owen WF, Stuckey DC, Healy JJB, Young LY, McCarty PL. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979; 13:485–93.
[24] Saraphirom P, Reungsang A. Optimization of biohydrogen production from sweet sorghum syrup using statistical methods. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35: 13435–44.
[25] Zheng XJ, Yu HQ. Inhibitory effects of butyrate on biological hydrogen production with mixed anaerobic cultures.J Environ Manage. 2005; 74: 66–70.
[26] Fangkum A, Reungsang A. Biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by elephant dung: Effects of initial pH and substrate concentration. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36: 8687–96.
[27] Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata J, Sluiter DT, et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass [Internet]. 2001 [updated 2011 July; cited 2014 Apr 20] Available from https://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html
[28] Nantapipat J, Luengnaruemitchai A, Wongkasemjit S. A comparison of dilute sulfuric and phosphoric acid pretreatments in biofuel production from corncobs. World Academy of Science Eng & Technol. 2013; 7: xx.
[29] Singh R, Tiwari S, Srivastava M, Shukla A. Performance study of combined microwave and acid pretreatment method for enhancing enzymatic digestibility of rice straw for bioethanol production. Plant Knowledge J. 2013; 2: 157–62.
[30] Mohammad JT, Keikhosro K. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2008; 9: 1621-51.
[31] Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S. Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review Bioresour Technol. 2003; 87: 155–9.
[32] Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hangerdal BH, Linden G, et al. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol & Biotenol. 2007; 82: 340–9.
[33] Vedrenne F, Beline F, Dabert P, Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99: 146–55.
[34] Heo NH, Park SC, Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. Environmental Science Health. 2004; 39: 1739–56.
[35] Kim J, Kang CM. Increased anaerobic production of methane by co-digestion of sludge with microalgal biomass and food waste leachate. Bioresour Technol. In press; doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.028
[36] Abouelenien F, Namba Y, Kosseva MR, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y. Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2014. 159: 80-7.
[37] Panponga K, Srisuwana G, O- Thong S, Kongjan P. Anaerobic co-digestion of canned seafood wastewater with glycerol waste for enhanced biogas production. Energy Procedia. 2014; 52: 328–36.
[38] Ince BK, Ince O, Anderson GK, Arayici S. Assessment of biogas use as an energy source from anaerobic digestion of brewery wastewater. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 2001; 126: 23.
[39] Van den Berg L, Kennedy KJ. Dairy waste treatment with anaerobic stationary fixed film reactors. Water Science & Technology. 1983; 15: 359–68.
[40] Ince O. Potential energy production from anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater. J Environ Sci Health Part A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 1998; 33: 1219–28.