Photosynthetic efficiency of PSII and growth of young rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) planted with mucuna (Mucuna bracteata) cover crop

Main Article Content

Anoma Dongsansuk
Supat Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya
Naruemol Kaewjumpa
Anan Polthanee

Abstract

Mucuna bracteata is a legume crop recommended for use as a cover crop to plant between rows of young rubber trees in an intercropping system. It has many advantages as a cover crop including its rapid growth rate, deep root system, drought tolerance and high nitrogen fixation rate. However, there is little information regarding the physiological roles, particularly in regards to enhancement of photosynthetic efficiency and growth performance, in which M. bracteata plants provide for the young rubber trees. Photosynthesis parameters including Photosystem II efficiency, chlorophyll content, the greenness or relative chlorophyll content of leaves (SPAD values) and growth of two-year-old rubber trees planted with or without M. bracteata were evaluated. The rubber plantation was situated at Khon Kaen University (NE Thailand) and the measurements were performed during the dry (March) and rainy (July) seasons in 2015. The results showed that the soil temperature in the experimental plot with cover crop was significantly lower than that in the plot without the cover crop. In contrast, soil moisture content in the plot with the cover crop was significantly higher than that without the cover crop. In the dry season, the effective quantum yield of PSII, ΔF/Fm', and the maximal fluorescence in the light-adapted state (Fm') of young rubber trees growing in the plot with the cover crop were found significantly higher than those without the cover crop. However, in the rainy season, ΔF/Fm', and Fm' of the rubber trees planted with the cover crop were significantly lower than those without the cover crop, whereas other fluorescence parameters were not different. In both seasons, the contents of Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and total Chlorophyll, SPAD values, leaf area and girth of rubber trees planted with the cover crop were significantly higher than those without the cover crop. This suggested that the use of M. bracteata as cover crop for the rubber plantation was beneficial for growth of young rubber plants. M. bracteata provided a favorable environment for the plantation leading to higher chlorophyll content, increased photosynthetic performances and hence better growth of the young rubber trees

Article Details

How to Cite
Dongsansuk, A., Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya, S., Kaewjumpa, N., & Polthanee, A. (2016). Photosynthetic efficiency of PSII and growth of young rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) planted with mucuna (Mucuna bracteata) cover crop. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 21(3), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2016.2
Section
Research Articles

References

(1) Laosuwan P, Yeedum I, Sripana P., Sirisongkram, P. A study on intercropping of young rubber I. Yield potential of different intercrops. Thai J Agric Sci. 1988;21: 179-188. Thai.

(2) Rice research center (RRC). Study on farming system in Kao Samnak. Rubber farm model of Pikulthing King project. 1991 Annual Group Meeting. Thai.

(3) Polthanee A, Promsena T. Effect of cropping system in intercropping with rubber on rubber growth and economic return. J Sci Technol MSU. 2010;29(3): 282-289. Thai.

(4) Wahab, M. RRIM short course on rubber planting and nursery technique. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumper, Malaysia; 1997.

(5) Hartley, C.W.S. The oil palm. West African Institute for oil Palm Research. Longman, New York; 1977.

(6) Chariachangel, M. The introduction and establishment of a new leguminous cover crop, Mucuna bracteata under oil palm in Malaysia. The Planter. 1998; 74(868): 363-368.

(7) Malézieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C, Laurans M, Makowski D, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Rapidel B, de Tourdonnet S, Valantin-Morison M. Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009; 29 (1): 43-62.

(8) Chariachangel, M. Leguminous cover plant-Mucuna Bracteata. The Planter. 1998; 74(806): 359-368.

(9) Sungthongwisate K. Mucuna Bracteata: new cover legume in rubber tree plantation. J Agric Syst. 2014; 3(1): 19-26. Thai.

(10) Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence – a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000. 51(345): 659-668.

(11) Larcher W. Physiological Plant Ecology (4th edition), SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; 2003

(12) Schreiber U. Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation (PAM) Fluorometry and Saturation Pulse Method: An Overview. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (eds.) Chlorophyll a fluorescence: A signature in Photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht; 2004. p. 279‒319.

(13) Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenyloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949; 24: 1–15.

(14) Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989; 990: 87-92.

(15) Genty B, Harbinson J, Baker NR. Relative quantum efficiencies of the two photosystems of leaves in photo respiratory and non-photo respiratory conditions. Plant Physiol Bioch. 1990; 28: 1-10.

(16) Taize, L. and Zeiger, E. Plant physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, USA; 2006.

(17) Gitelson AA, Buschmann C, Lichtenthaler HK. The Chlorophyll Fluorescence Ratio F735/F700 as an Accurate Measure of the Chlorophyll Content in Plants. Remote Sens Environ. 1999; 69 (3): 296–302.

(18) Saarinen T. Chlorophyll fluorescence, and nitrogen and pigment content of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) needles in polluted urban habitats. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1993;30(1): 1-7.

(19) Yahan C, Wenxuan H, Luying T, Zhiyao T, Jingyun F. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of woody plants differ in responses to climate, soil and plant growth form. Ecography. 2011; 36(2): 178-184.

(20) Pushparajah, E. Nutrition and fertilizer use in Havea and associated cover in Peninsular Malaysia-A review. J Rubber Res Inst Sri Lanka. 1977; 54: 270-283.

(21) Kothandaraman RJ, Mathews AK, Krishnakumar K, Joseph K, Jayarathnam K, Sethuraj MR Comparative efficiency of Mucuna bracteata D.C. and Pueraria phaseoloides Benth on soil nutrient enrichment, microbial population and growth of Havea. Indian Journal Natural Rubber Research. 1989; 2: 147-150.

(22) Chariachangel, M. The introduction and establishment of a new leguminous cover crop, Mucuna bracteata under oil palm in Malaysia. Planter 1998; 74:363-368

(23) Kaewjumpa N, Choosai C, Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya S, Gonkhamdee S, Sungthongwises K, Wongcharoen A. Effect of different types of intercrops with rubber tree on some soil nutrients and soil fertility. Khon Kaen Agr J. 2014; 42(3): 443-449.

(24) Broughton WJ. Effects of various covers on soil fertility under Heavea brasiliensis and on growth of the tree. Agro-Ecosystems. 1977; 3: 147-170.

(25) Clermont-Dauphin C, Suvannang ., Pongwichian P, Cheylan V, Hammecker C, Harmand JM. 2016. Dinitrogen fixation by the legume cover crop Pueraria phaseoloides and transfer of fixed N to Hevea brasiliensis-Impact on tree growth and vulnerabirity to drought. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 217: 79-88.

(26) Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980; 149: 78-90.

(27) Berry J, Farquhar G. The CO2 concentrating function of C4 photosynthesis. A biochemical model. In: Proceeding of the 4th International Congress on Photosynthesis. Reading, England, 1977. Hall D, Coombs J, Goodwin T. (eds) The Biochemical Society. London. 1978; 119-131.