Technology and Pedagogy Types in Foreign and Second Language Learning Focusing on Listening Comprehension: A Review of Literature
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This review categorizes technology and pedagogy types used in foreign and second language
learning for enhancing listening comprehension. The objective of this study is to review existing literature
to examine what technology and pedagogy types were used in teaching, listening comprehension and
how learners and instructors interacted with technology, in foreign and second language learning.
Main findings from documentary research include nine unique technology types, six pedagogy types
used, learner-technology interaction and suggestions for learner-instructor interaction when using
technology to enhance listening comprehension in foreign and second language learning.
บทความนี้นำเสนอประเภทของเทคโนโลยีและศาสตร์การสอนที่ใช้ในการเรียนการสอนภาษาต่างประเทศ
และการเรียนการสอนภาษาที่สองเพื่อเพิ่มพูนความสามารถในการฟังเพื่อความเข้าใจ มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อทบทวน
งานวิจัยที่เกี่ยวข้อง โดยศึกษาประเภทของเทคโนโลยีและศาสตร์การสอนที่ใช้ในการเรียนการสอน การฟังและศึกษา
ปฏิสัมพันธ์ระหว่างผู้เรียน ผู้สอน และเทคโนโลยีที่ใช้ในการเรียนการสอน ผลการวิจัยเอกสารพบว่า เทคโนโลยี
ใช้ในการเรียนการสอนภาษาต่างประเทศและการเรียนการสอนภาษาที่สองเพื่อเพิ่มพูนความสามารถในการฟัง
เพื่อความเขา้ ใจ จำนวน 9 ประเภท ศาสตรก์ ารสอน จำนวน 6 ชนิด ปฏิสัมพันธร์ ะหวา่ งผูเ้รียนและเทคโนโลยี ตลอดจน
ข้อเสนอแนะสำหรับการมีปฏิสัมพันธ์ระหว่างผู้เรียนและผู้สอนในการใช้เทคโนโลยีเพื่อเพิ่มพูนความสามารถใน
การฟังเพื่อความเข้าใจในการเรียนการสอนภาษาต่างประเทศและการเรียนการสอนภาษาที่สอง
Article Details
1. Any views and comments in the FEU Academic Review Journal are the authors’ views. The editorial staff have not to agree with those views and it is not considered as the editorial’s responsibility.
2. The responsibility of content and draft check of each article belongs to each author. In case, there is any lawsuit about copyright infringement. It is considered as the authors’ sole responsibility.
3. The article copyright belonging to the authors and the Far Eastern University are copyrighted legally. Republication must be received direct permission from the authors and the Far Eastern University in written form.
References
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., & Gruba, P. A. (2012). Listeners' interactions with help options in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 228-245. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.724425
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., & Gruba, P. A. (2013). Decoding the “CoDe”: a framework for conceptualizing and designing help options in computer-based second language listening. ReCALL, 25(02), 250-271. doi: 10.1017/s0958344013000049
Dahl, T. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2014). How I See What You're Saying: The Role of Gestures in Native and Foreign Language Listening Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 813-833. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12124.x
de la Fuente, M. J. (2012). Learners' attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: the role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261-276. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.733710
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flanagan, S., & Shoffner, M. (2013). Teaching With(Out) Technolgy: Secondary English Teachers and Classroom Technology Use. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 242 - 261.
Gobel, P., & Kano, M. (2013). Implementing a year-long reading while listening program for Japanese University EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 279-293. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.864314
Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55 - 75.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2012). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Hanson-Smith, E. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners' Perceptions of Listening Comprehension Problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153. doi: 10.1080/07908310008666595
Helgesen, M., & Brown, S. (2007). Practical English Language Teaching : Listening. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hong, Z.-W., Chen, Y.-L., & Lan, C.-H. (2012). A courseware to script animated pedagogical agents in instructional material for elementary students in English education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 379-394. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.733712
Koning, P. (2012a). Learning Through Online Networking. The Language Educator, 7(5), 44 – 48.
Koning, P. (2012b). Online Videos Connect Students to Language and Culture. The Language Educator, 7(6), 40-44.
Leveridge, A. N., & Yang, J. C. (2013a). Learner perceptions of reliance on captions in EFL multimedia listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 545-559. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.776968
Leveridge, A. N., & Yang, J. C. (2013b). Testing learner reliance on caption supports in second language listening comprehension multimedia environments. ReCALL, 25(02), 199-214. doi: 10.1017/s0958344013000074
Levy, M., & Hubbard, P. (2005). Why call CALL “CALL”? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 143-149. doi: 10.1080/09588220500208884
Lynch, T. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, J., & O’Toole, J. M. (2013). Investigating an innovative computer application to improve L2 word recognition from speech. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-19. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.864315
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2013). Is less more? Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of keyword and full captioned video for L2 listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26(01), 21-43. doi: 10.1017/s0958344013000256
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1997, 3-5 Oct. 1997). Approaches to Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom. Paper presented at the Korea TESOL Conference, Kyoung-ju, South Korea.
O’malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1988). Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. ELT, 10(4), 418-437.
Rost, M. (1991). Listening in action: activities for developing listening in language teaching. New York: Prenice Hall.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow Pearson Education.
Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: an emic approach. ReCALL, 25(01), 48-62. doi: 10.1017/s095834401200033x
Stockwell, G. (2012). Computer-assisted language learning : diversity in research and practice.
Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Zeeland, H. (2014). Lexical Inferencing in First and Second Language Listening. The Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 1006-1021. doi: 10.1111/modl.12152
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(03), 191. doi: 10.1017/s0261444807004338
Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology Enhanced Language Learning: connecting theory and practice. Oxford Oxford University Press.
Wang, J., & Liu, W. (2013). English Listening Teaching Method Based on Multimedia. 208, 337-342. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4796-1_43
Wilson, J. J. (2009). How to teach listening. Essex: Pearson Longman.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2013). Factors Influencing the Use of Captions by Foreign Language Learners: An Eye‐Tracking Study. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 254 - 275. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01432.x
Yang, J. C., & Chang, P. (2013). Captions and reduced forms instruction: The impact on EFL students’ listening comprehension. ReCALL, 26(01), 44-61. doi: 10.1017/s0958344013000219