The Potential of Auditors and the Audit Process Affecting the Effectiveness of Audit Reporting in Cooperatives under Thailand

Authors

  • Daranee Uachanachit สาขาวิชาการบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม
  • อัมมราภรณ์ เพชรวารี สาขาวิชาการบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม

Keywords:

auditors’ competencies, audit process, audit reporting effectiveness, cooperatives, Thailand

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between auditors’ competencies and the effectiveness of audit reporting in cooperatives, as well as the relationship between audit processes and audit reporting effectiveness in cooperatives in Thailand. The population of this quantitative research comprises 7,387 auditors, from which a stratified random sampling method was employed, yielding a final sample of 380 respondents. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed through multiple regression analysis to validate the hypothesized relationships.

        The empirical findings reveal that auditors’ competencies exert a significant positive influence on the effectiveness of audit reporting in cooperatives. Similarly, audit processes also have a positive impact on audit reporting effectiveness. Audit reporting effectiveness was operationalized into four dimensions: clarity, accuracy, timeliness, and the provision of useful information. Furthermore, all variables were found to be significantly correlated at the 0.01 level. The findings provide theoretical and practical implications, suggesting that auditors’ competencies and well-structured audit processes serve as critical determinants for enhancing the quality and effectiveness of cooperative audit reporting.

References

กรมตรวจบัญชีสหกรณ์. (2567). รายงานผลการดำเนินงานประจำปี พ.ศ. 2567. กรุงเทพฯ: กรมตรวจบัญชีสหกรณ์ กระทรวงเกษตรและสหกรณ์.

กฤษฎา ฉิมพลีวัฒน. (2565). สหกรณ์สีขาวด้วยธรรมาภิบาลเพื่อสร้างความเชื่อมั่นในระบบสหกรณ์ในยุคความปกติถัดไป. วิทยาลัยชุมชนระนอง.

กฤษฎา ฉิมพลีวัฒน.(2565). สหกรณ์สีขาวด้วยธรรมาภิบาลเพื่อสร้างความเชื่อมั่นในระบบสหกรณ์ในยุคความปกติถัดไป. วิทยาลัยชุมชนระนอง.

บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2545). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น. กรุงเทพฯ: สุวีริยาสาส์น.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.

Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443–1478.

Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of AI in auditing: How artificial intelligence is transforming the profession. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122.

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.

OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Uachanachit, D. ., & เพชรวารี อ. . (2025). The Potential of Auditors and the Audit Process Affecting the Effectiveness of Audit Reporting in Cooperatives under Thailand. The Journal of Development Administration Research, 15(3-4), 3960–3971. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDAR/article/view/283111

Issue

Section

Research Articles